SimonSays, now you're employing the strawman fallacy. I didn't say you were attacking anyone's character (even though what you said could be related to an attack of character).
I specifically took issue with this:
To represent people's thoughts like you people have with the WTS publishing without really reading it through but take snippets to distort what the literature actually is intending? I can understand the anger, bitterness, and hate ex-witnesses have toward an organization that kicked them out for whatever biblical infraction they did.
And I refuted it. You did not answer/address my refutation.
I’m... simply stating the obvious
What you're stating is not in any way obvious. I give you another chance to address what I said. We don't take snippets and distort them; the org does. I can give examples of the org's doing such (I've already mentioned the Creator book and the Trinity brochure). Can you give examples of our doing such?
Also, we're not, as you seem to indicate, just a bunch of people who want to be JWs, but who were kicked out and are now retaliating. There are a number of people on this site who are serving as elders.
Since you have the influence to ban people from this forum...
I have no such influence.
I will simply say, I disagree with your assessment.
Now, you're generalizing again; you simply say "I disagree with your assessment". People like you speak in generalities and can't back up their arguments. Do you realize what would happen if you went into a courtroom and made general accusations against an opponent? Do you know what would be the first thing the judge would ask for? Specifics.
You came on this thread and made general accusations. I think you now realize you can't back them up. If so, please just go ahead and admit it. If you do, I will commend you for it.