Biblical Injunction To 'Spare the Rod' And Spoil the Child' or 10 Reasons Not To Hit Your Child

by frankiespeakin 20 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltoYJvsLwGg

    http://www.naturalchild.org/jan_hunt/tenreasons.html

    In 37 countries 1 around the world, it is illegal for a parent, teacher, or anyone else to spank a child, and 113 countries prohibit corporal punishment in schools. Yet in all of North America, physical punishment by a parent, as long as it is not severe, is still seen by many as necessary discipline, and condoned, or sadly, even encouraged.

    For the past several years, many psychiatrists, sociological researchers, and parents have recommended that we seriously consider banning the physical punishment of children. The most important reason, according to Dr. Peter Newell, coordinator of the organization End Punishment of Children (EPOCH) 2 , is that "all people have the right to protection of their physical integrity, and children are people too." 3

    1. Hitting children teaches them to become hitters themselves. Extensive research data is now available to support a direct correlation between corporal punishment in childhood and aggressive or violent behavior in the teenage and adult years. Virtually all of the most dangerous criminals were regularly threatened and punished in childhood. It is nature's plan that children learn attitudes and behaviors through observation and imitation of their parents' actions, for good or ill. Thus it is the responsibility of parents to set an example of empathy and wisdom.

    2. In many cases of so-called "bad behavior", the child is simply responding in the only way he can, given his age and experience, to neglect of basic needs. Among these needs are: proper sleep and nutrition, treatment of hidden allergy, fresh air, exercise, and sufficient freedom to explore the world around him. But his greatest need is for his parents' undivided attention. In these busy times, few children receive sufficient time and attention from their parents, who are often too distracted by their own problems and worries to treat their children with patience and empathy. It is surely wrong and unfair to punish a child for responding in a natural way to having important needs neglected. For this reason, punishment is not only ineffective in the long run, it is also clearly unjust.

    3. Punishment distracts the child from learning how to resolve conflict in an effective and humane way. As the educator John Holt wrote, "When we make a child afraid, we stop learning dead in its tracks." A punished child becomes preoccupied with feelings of anger and fantasies of revenge, and is thus deprived of the opportunity to learn more effective methods of solving the problem at hand. Thus, a punished child learns little about how to handle or prevent similar situations in the future.

    4. Punishment interferes with the bond between parent and child, as it is not human nature to feel loving toward someone who hurts us. The true spirit of cooperation which every parent desires can arise only through a strong bond based on mutual feelings of love and respect. Punishment, even when it appears to work, can produce only superficially good behavior based on fear, which can only take place until the child is old enough to resist. In contrast, cooperation based on respect will last permanently, bringing many years of mutual happiness as the child and parent grow older.

    5. Many parents never learned in their own childhood that there are positive ways of relating to children. When punishment does not accomplish the desired goals, and if the parent is unaware of alternative methods, punishment can escalate to more frequent and dangerous actions against the child.

    6. Anger and frustration which cannot be safely expressed by a child become stored inside; angry teenagers do not fall from the sky. Anger that has been accumulating for many years can come as a shock to parents whose child now feels strong enough to express this rage. Punishment may appear to produce "good behavior" in the early years, but always at a high price, paid by parents and by society as a whole, as the child enters adolescence and early adulthood.

    7. Spanking on the buttocks, an erogenous zone in childhood, can create in the child's mind an association between pain and sexual pleasure, and lead to difficulties in adulthood. "Spanking wanted" ads in alternative newspapers attest to the sad consequences of this confusion of pain and pleasure. If a child receives little parental attention except when being punished, this will further merge the concepts of pain and pleasure in the child's mind. A child in this situation will have little self-esteem, believing he deserves nothing better. For more on this topic, see "The Sexual Dangers of Spanking Children" (also in French).

    8. Even relatively moderate spanking can be physically dangerous. Blows to the lower end of the spinal column send shock waves along the length of the spine, and may injure the child. The prevalence of lower back pain among adults in our society may well have its origins in childhood punishment. Some children have become paralyzed through nerve damage from spanking, and some have died after mild paddlings, due to undiagnosed medical complications.

    9. Physical punishment gives the dangerous and unfair message that "might makes right", that it is permissible to hurt someone else, provided they are smaller and less powerful than you are. The child then concludes that it is permissible to mistreat younger or smaller children. When he becomes an adult, he can feel little compassion for those less fortunate than he is, and fears those who are more powerful. This will hinder the establishment of meaningful relationships so essential to an emotionally fulfilling life.

    10. Because children learn through parental modeling, physical punishment gives the message that hitting is an appropriate way to express feelings and to solve problems. If a child does not observe a parent solving problems in a creative and humane way, it can be difficult for him to learn to do this himself. For this reason, unskilled parenting often continues into the next generation.

    Gentle instruction, supported by a strong foundation of love and respect, is the only truly effective way to bring about commendable behavior based on strong inner values, instead of superficially "good" behavior based only on fear.

  • Finkelstein
    Finkelstein

    It can be said without compromise or doubt that humanity has learned much more about are selves and are own psychological and sociological

    make up from what was understood and known 3000 years ago in the middle east from the ancient Hebrew/Judean nation.

  • hoser
    hoser

    I became very angry reading this.

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    Finkle,

    True. Relying on an old book to guide modern man seems ludicrous. We know so much more now that civilization has been around around 11,000 years, to go back to a time of more ignorance and let it guide us doesn't make sense. Progressiveness is much better than stagnant biased towards the old ways.

  • Bungi Bill
    Bungi Bill

    Some excellent points made there, particularly the one about how nearly all dangerous criminals were beaten as children.

    In recent times, some have tried to rationalise the bible's statements about the "rod" and discipline by claiming that it is really referring to a shepherd's "staff" -which is an implement used for guiding sheep, rather than striking them with. However, other verses in the bible book of Proverbs are explicit about "striking" or "beating" with this same "rod", thus making it abundantly clear that corporal punishment is indeed being prescribed there!

    Yet other bible verses also indicate that the "rod" and the "staff" are two separate things - a point that has been picked up by a different bible commentators.

    Where I come from, a shepherd's staff is known as a "mustering stick", and would normally consist of a length of manuka 5ft-6ft (1.5-1.8m) long. Besides being used as an extension to the shepherd's arm when guiding a group of sheep into a pen or through a gateway, the staff has a variety of other uses, too:

    - e.g. as a extension handle for hanging the billy from over an open fire when making a brew of tea at "smoko" time. Or when driven securely into the ground, it can be used for tethering the sheepdogs to overnight in the mustering camp. Also,when climbing up a steep slope, the staff makes a handy trek pole. Likewise, when fording a swift-flowing river, the mustering stick helps keep ones balance.

    The shepherd's staff (aka mustering stick) is truly a versatile implement! One thing, however, it has very limited use for is in striking something with -it is a little too long and a lttle too unwieldy for that.

    Not so the "rod". It is a shorter device, which these days is most likely to consist of a length of black polythene water pipe, 2ft -3ft (600mm - 900mm) long and used specifically for administering blows to cattle while "persuading" these to advance along a race, or up a ramp into a stock crate.

    No amount of rationalisation is going to alter the fact that the bible is indeed recommending the use of corporal punishment in the discipline of children. We are now living in the 21st Century (or at least, we are supposed to be!). It is therefore surely time to pension off guidebooks that were written by primitive civilisations one step removed from desert nomads - and that still reflect the harshness of that environment.

    Bill.

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    It will make the world a much safer place if our children don't have to suffer violence from their parents. Hilter was beaten by his dad and landed in a comma for 3 days and we see what effect that had for the whole world.

    http://biography.yourdictionary.com/articles/adolf-hitlers-childhood.html

    Interestingly, Adolf Hilter was born on Easter Sunday. However, he would not come to represent the beautiful ideals that Easter stands for. The date was April 20, 1889, and he arrived at 6:30 in the evening.

    He was born to Alois and Klara Hitler. Adolf had five siblings, but only one lived past childhood:

    • Gustav died at the age of two in 1887
    • Ida died at the age of two in 1888
    • Otto died within a year of birth in 1887
    • Edmund died at the age of six in 1900
    • His sister, Paul, was born in 1896 and lived until 1960

    Alois was an Austrian customs official and he was able to provide his family with a comfortable lifestyle; however, he and his son did not get along. Alois had a terrible temper and had a general bad attitude. He was obnoxious and conceited, and he often took his problems out on his children.

    His wife was the complete opposite from him, but she had virtually no power in the household. Coupled with the fact that women did not have much power to begin with, she was dealing with an aggressive and dominating husband.

    How do you make a murderous Dictator, perhaps being abused as a child has some lasting consquences reaching over into adulthood as a programed responce which is useing violence and might to solve issues as apposed to other options?

  • Apognophos
    Apognophos

    A couple of those points are redundant and a couple are much more assertive than is warranted from evidence. Many adults today were spanked as children and do not have anger problems. The statements about spanking causing sexual fetishes and lower back pain sound like something from the 1800s.

    However, the rest of the points are well made. Children should not be taught that it's okay to hit someone in order to resolve a problem. This can also provide a model for the view in adulthood that it's only right for God to smite us when we misbehave. The idea that God has the right to treat humans as so much cattle is really just extending the rightfulness of parental spanking to the cosmic level and applying it to God.

    I never heard before that Adolf was beaten so hard that he was in a coma. I'd kind of like to see a source for that. It is true that apparently his father was abusive, and I wouldn't be surprised at all if this helped make Adolf what he became. From what I've read about him, he had a seeming lack of feeling towards all adults. This is just a personal theory, but his anger towards the Jews was likely just an outlet for his anger towards people in general. Notably, even as the man who approved the Final Solution, he showed kindness to children and animals, and for a mate he preferred the child-like Eva Braun.

  • frankiespeakin
  • Finkelstein
    Finkelstein

    There are scriptures that state that children who dishonor their parents to a certain extent, that these children should be killed by stoning.

    Now hows that for respect for the young ?

  • Apognophos
    Apognophos

    Just a little correction, I meant to say "This is just a personal theory, but his anger towards the Jews was likely just an outlet for his anger towards adults in general". I was trying to draw a contrast between how he related to adults and to those he probably perceived as "innocent" or "guileless".

    frankiespeakin: Ah, I see it mentions this severe beating on page 18 of the Academia document, which goes back to Langer's biography as a source.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit