Trademark office rejects Watchtower's application for "JW.Org" logo

by AndDontCallMeShirley 28 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • AndDontCallMeShirley
    AndDontCallMeShirley

    http://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=85896124&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch

    Even though Watchtower's application has been rejected, they will be allowed to use the logo because it is for religious usage and will not be confused with commercial products.

    The Trademark Office did note this:

    Indeed, numerous other marks are registered reflecting the letters J and W:

    Ø JW Secure (Reg. No. 3922550) – design mark for computer consultation in the field of computer security Ø JW (Reg. No. 3944163) – design mark for on-line retail and wholesale store services

    Ø JANITOR'S WORLD JANITORIAL SUPPLIES & EQUIPMENT JW (Reg. No. 3701631) – design mark for on-line retail and wholesale store services Ø

    JELD-WEN MILLWORK UNIVERSITY JW TRAINING MILLWORK PROFESSIONALS (Reg. No. 3599569) – design mark for education services

    Ø JELD-WEN MILLWORK UNIVERSITY JW TRAINING MILLWORK PROFESSIONALS (Reg. No. 3632347) – design mark for education services .

    ---

    How appropriate !!! LOL.

  • Balaamsass2
    Balaamsass2

    JW = Janitor's World. LOL!!!!!!

    I love the email address.

  • Apognophos
    Apognophos

    Oh. My. God. This is going to catch on as an expansion of "JW", isn't it?

  • disposable hero of hypocrisy
    disposable hero of hypocrisy

    HahaHa absolutely!

  • Juan Viejo2
    Juan Viejo2

    Betcha I can TradeMark "JWBORG.org"...

    JV

  • Dis-Member
    Dis-Member

    The org tried to avoid that negative decision. They changed their attorney in the middle of their application: Jan. 29, 2014

    From:

    RICHARD D. MOAKE
    100 WATCHTOWER DR
    PATTERSON New York (NY) 12563-2232
    US

    to one that specialises in 'Reversal of Patent Appeals' I suspect because they sensed a rejection coming up.

    Steven B. Simonis,
    Steward Johnston & Reens LLC,
    986 Bedford Street,Stamford, Connecticut,
    United States

    https://www.ssjr.com/

    http://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn85896124&docId=RAA20140203090411#docIndex=3&page=1

    But they failed.

    The reason I gather they were refused is that they have no product.. they are not selling anything. They have no commercial product. They need no trademark as they have nothing to 'trade'.

    SPECIMEN MUST SHOW USE OF MARK WITH CLASS 16 GOODS

    Registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce. 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a). Specifically, applicant has applied to register the mark for use with printed materials. The submitted screenshots do not show applicant’s mark in use on printed Class 16 goods. Rather, they show the mark on a website where downloadable magazines are available. However, these electronic publications are not Class 16 goods. Rather, applicant must show the applied-for mark in use on printed materials, or in the ordering of the printed materials, as discussed in greater detail below.

    Applicant may respond to this refusal by satisfying one of the following:

    (1) Submit a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) that (a) was in actual use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of an amendment to allege use and (b) shows the mark in actual use in commerce for the goods identified in the application or amendment to allege use.

    (2) Amend the filing basis to intent to use under Section 1(b), for which no specimen is required. This option will later necessitate additional fee(s) and filing requirements such as providing a specimen at a subsequent date.

    For an overview of both response options referenced above and instructions on how to satisfy either option online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, please go to http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/law/specimen.jsp.

  • AlphaMan
    AlphaMan

    Question for any believing JW lurkers out there. Why would Jehovah's "holy spirit" lead the Organization to develop the awe-inspiring JW.Org logo for trademark approval and not even have the foresight to see the TM Office would disprove it? LOL

    Answer: Because there is no Jehovah's holy spirit guiding this man-made, man-lead, group of ever-changing bat-shit crazy beliefs believing, family destroying cultists.

  • Listener
    Listener

    From this information it would seem possible for someone else to change the logo slightly and establish a use for it commercially for it to be approved.

  • cultBgone
    cultBgone

    I may have misread the application, but it appears that they applied for a mark where the "JW." appears above the "ORG" -- yet the mark I keep seeing is the "JW" above the ".ORG" so is everyone using it incorrectly on the bOrg jewelry and such?

  • AndDontCallMeShirley
    AndDontCallMeShirley

    Plan B: change the logo to what is really desired: "GB.Org".

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit