by default power without love and consideration is ruthless
Prove that. Power could be motivated by pity but not love, by hate of one thing but not love of another thing. You are asserting a mutual exclusiveness that you haven't proven. All your work is ahead of you.
take away the' so called" limitation of God's love what is left ? .. ruthless love
It's not so-called, it is. And rutheless is not what's left since you haven't proven it's not motivated by hate of something else and not simply a lack of love.
How can limiting love be anything but a negative and ruthless love ?
Well, you just used your premise as your conclusion, so I am not sure what you are asking. Perhaps if we put this in math terms? Just because X doesn't = Y doesn't mean it equals the opposite of Y, it could mean nothing or an entire range of things that are not Y, like red or seashell or decay rate of uranium. Similarly, power NOT limited by love could equal any number of things besides rutheless, such as hate, comfort, desire, time of day, how a person in Australia slept last night, etc.
You are simply asserting it MUST be ruthless because you haven't explored or conceived or any other options.
You know what a quote is right ?
You know what by default means right ?
Of course. That's why I used both accurately, silly bear!