THE REAL REASON WHY THE WATCHTOWER NEVER WRITES ABOUT ISLAM OR MUSLIMS IS FEAR!

by ÁrbolesdeArabia 31 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • ÁrbolesdeArabia
    ÁrbolesdeArabia

    For a religion that claims to be "Fearless and Bold" the Watchtower has avoided writing about Islam and Muslim practices and how they are part of Babylon the Great. The attacks on Christendom are not a bold move because the "Tower" and "GB" know the Christian Church is not going to send a suicide bomber into a Kingdom or District Convention.

    It's not fair to Christendom to receive all the hate speech from the "Leaning Tower of Brooklyn", why don't they write the Truth about Islam? Is it fear or fear?

  • yadda yadda 2
    yadda yadda 2

    They've written about Islam. What on earth are you blathering about?

  • ÁrbolesdeArabia
    ÁrbolesdeArabia

    Please post the article they wrote about Islam being part of the Harlot riding the Wild Beast! Make the article in the last ten years please, with all the terrorism I want to see this!

    Ray Franz wrote in his book "In Search Of Christian Freedom" there is a reason the Watchtower has behaved cowardly around this subject when one compares their hateful words to Christendom. He provides examples of Jehovah Witnesses riding the coat-tails of Christendoms Missionaries who paved the way in many African Countries and why the Watchtower fails miserably in a Country where Christendom never stuck their foot in.

    Missionaries from Christendom over the ages have preached without fear in Islamic Countries, Jehovah's Witnesses are there to preach to Christians who learned about Christ from the courageous missionaires Christendom and all those evil Bible Societies sent out Pre-WTS. Franz notes how little progress the Witnesses make in lands of Islam, is that why the Apostles of the Watchtower like to use the term "Community Guilt"? This excuses them from preaching in countries they are afraid to? What about "the bold Witness that goes forth througout the Earth", it stops in all countries Christendom failed to prepare for the Witnesses to preach in. Where would the WTS be without the aid of Christendom and all those "non Christian preachers', the new magazine fails to mention in July 15th, 2013 magazine.

    The Magazine states once the apostles died, the field of Christians went into suspended animation until the pure truths of Rutherford and his gang showed up on earth. The Earth was meant to give birth to Rutherford (The Modern Jesus Using WT Reasoning). Russell is "John The Baptist" and by default that makes "Rutherford" the modern day "Jesus".

  • steve2
    steve2

    I Think you are correct. To be fair, though, even fundamentalist churches are tepidly cautious in their pronouncements against Islam. But yes, Christendom,the Catholic church in particular is a very easy target. It's not so much sitting ducks as sitting Popes. Those who are familiar with the writings, I mean, the ramblings of Rutherford would go so far as to say the current 'attacks' in the publications on Christendom are terribly limp-wristed compared with earlier times. I guess any organization can only keep up the rhetoric for so long before even the loyal followers begin to yawn and shuffle their little feet out of boredom. Besides, we live in an age of increasing religious tolerance that even theJWS benefit from. It just doesn't look so good to be constantly publishing articles harping on about the pitfalls and perils of other religions.

  • yadda yadda 2
    yadda yadda 2

    They wrote a whole brochure for Muslims. entitled The Time for True Submission to God, published 1982. And in Mankind's Search for God, there's a section on Islam.

  • mP
    mP

    yadda: the original point is the WTS was very careful in their wording in the pamphlets taking care not to offend muslims in anyway which is quite different from their other colourful language.

  • prologos
    prologos

    being discreet is the better part of valor.

    having been able to watch the twin towers burn and collaps from their windows at columbia heights and the stream of panicky refugees coming across the brooklyn bridge toward them, taught them the clear lesson, that no,

    Babylon the great HAS NOT FALLEN, never did, but

    the leaning tower of bragging brooklyn might break, crack and fall too, if they are not carefull. (both Nazi and Commie orgs collapsed with a little help from the outside)

    It might turn out that BtG spells more like BaGhdad then Rome at least geographicly and in fervor for sure. (major possibilty.)

    Consider too the similarity between WT BtS policies and Muselman doctrine (as applied by the local Iman/Elders:

    converting to another faith carries the death/ disfellowshipping sentence. prosetylizing among muslem,jws carries the death/ disfellowshipping/expulsion/banning sentence.

    publishing critizising, carricaturizing material carries the death sentence/shunning sentence (any wt rushties here?) so:

    Brooklyn does not want to swallow its' own medicine.

  • zeb
    zeb

    Salam!

  • Bungi Bill
    Bungi Bill

    Very good point!

    A number of years ago, I knew some JWs who hailed from Malaysia.

    In their country, it was (and still is ) illegal to "witness" to anybody of the Moslim faith. As a consequence, the much-vaunted JW worldwide door to door preaching campaign (supposedly, conclusive proof that they - and they alone - are true Christians) in that country is limited to persons who already profess Christianity as their religion.Furthermore, these same JWs were of no doubt that the moment somebody tried to witness to a Moslem, the brown stuff would hit the fanblades.

    In this, as in so many other matters, Ray Franz was right on the money!

    Bill.

  • Aussie Oz
    Aussie Oz

    possibly also because they are 'in bed' with Islam... i refer to the OSCE and the co-hosting of discusssions regarding persecution.

    I agree that the catholic and protestant churches are easy targets for the WT. While they try to convert Muslims, they use the lie side of the mouth, the propaganda side, in the literature.

    They only talk about them in a soft way, appealing to muslims love for allah etc etc they are shit scared to go all rutherford on them

    oz

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit