by enigma1863 55 Replies latest jw friends
Let us take the case to court. Evidence presented
to the judge and jury. The defendant (pro flood).
The prosecutor case (lying to the public). Prosecutor
evidence, a large pile of data with facts and figures.
Scientific methods of proving his case and common sense.
The defendant, sitting on his bench the Bible.
So if the jury perform their duty and consider the evidence,
how do you think they will rule?
God created a hypercube within the Ark that allowed for more space than that which is normally allowable.
God didn't leave any evidence of a Global Flood, he wiped that out so that you could rely soley on faith about this account.
There are no arguments against the Global Flood. They do not withstand God's mighty power.
Again, I ask WHY WOULD THE WHOLE EARTH NEED TO BE FLOODED?? Especially if humans were only living in a certain part of the earth. And if there were people living on OTHER CONTINENTS back then - HOW was Noah expected to PREACH to them without the benefit of modern day multi-continental travel?
BM: Because there were sinful animals living in that part
of the world, that's why it was global.
I googled clean animals in the bible and went to the first link. www.ucg.org
Not sure how accurate the list is. I also took out all the clean fish. There is also a list of unclean animals.
