Disgusting Words From A WT Apologist Regarding Candace.

by Bangalore 34 Replies latest jw friends

  • Dagney
    Dagney

    Someone should make sure Simons sees this...don't think it could be used in court, but it is quite revealing to the attitude that is fostered by WBTS.

    BTW, is that really Timothy Kline? Wa on his board yeeeaaaars ago.

  • Open mind
    Open mind

    Marking.

    om

  • AnnOMaly
    AnnOMaly

    No, wait. What are you beating up on Timothy Kline for, sf? He isn't T-wit! T-wit was always gunning for TK/morloc - relentlessly - causing no end of trouble for him.

    T-wit's topix posts are disgraceful, in very bad taste. They should be reported.

  • Dagney
    Dagney

    (waves to Ann )

  • Band on the Run
    Band on the Run

    His comments certainly trigger feelings of shock and anger. Most of the comments I read disparage Conti's reputation. They are very revealing. The fact that a pedophile abused her is is almost certain. Kendrick did not bother to show up. The issue is not whether she was molested. They ignored the real issue: whether the WT had a legal duty to notify the congregation of Kendrick's crimes. Another issue is whether the court decided correctly that Kendrick received counseling rather than a standard confession and penance provision. They live in a fantasy land where biological sex drives and almost lack of impulse control are present. The Witnesses remind me of Nazis who will go to any length to believe what they are told. They don't respect the WT as their chosen authority. No, they worship the WT, rather than YHWH or Christ. It also reminds me of Manson's followers. It is very scary. The WT was not liable because a pedophile abuse Conti. Bad things happen in this world. They were liable because a court ruled Kendrick's disclosure was not a confession since there was no expectation of privacy. The two witness rule created a situation where despite the credibility of Kendrick's disclosure, nothing was done to warn the congregation. We all know the two witness rule is a distortion of scripture. Certainly, is not essential or mere Christianity.

  • sf
    sf

    Ann,

    I know who is who in his games.

    He is extremely trans-parent. No mistaking here.

    My posting limits keep me from continuing to add to this thread. Therefore, I'll keep editing it to add his other twit accounts...again, no mistake here Ann:

    THIS IS THE FACE THAT IS MORE APPROPRIATE IN DISCUSSING WT CHILD/ SEX ABUSE ON THE NET:

    http://twitter.com/#!/Envisionocity

    http://twitter.com/#!/capricauprising

    http://twitter.com/#!/ewatchman posted as a FOLLOWER/FOLLOWING

  • Billy the Ex-Bethelite
    Billy the Ex-Bethelite

    The quote in the OP sounds like a pedophile going into self-defense mode. Instead of correcting what is really wrong in WT and their KHs, attack the victim.

  • AnnOMaly
    AnnOMaly

    sf, I'm sorry, I cannot connect the dots. T-wit is the very antithesis of TK. It doesn't make sense to me. I wouldn't put it past T-wit to make a whole bunch of fake/impersonation accounts. I remember TK from Pathways days, from when he was helping with techie stuff on King's site - even after T-wit hit cyberspace with his fulminations against King and TK.

    You're saying that the person who was critical of WTS policies on child abuse is the same person who vehemently defends those policies and asserts there's nothing wrong.

    Yes, many of us remember the Trevor/Linda saga on here, so I'm not totally naïve ...

    Just, I don't see how you have come to your conclusions.

    See e.g. http://thetruthaboutthetruthaboutthetruth.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=Kline

    @ Dagney *clink*

  • Dagney
    Dagney

    Ugh. Just clicked on e-watchman...he is soooooooo creepy!!!! Does anybody buy his crap anymore? I need to go wash my eyes.

  • AnnOMaly
    AnnOMaly

    Ugh, yes. I always found him creepy.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit