Godrulz, I don't interpret your views as being monotheim. You continue to speak of "false gods" as if their existence has any power at all. You imagine an entire pantheon of gods that must be resisted, rebuffed, and challenged.
I have a long history of engaging in intelligent discussions. But that demands two partners. I've frequently asked you to respond based on the quality of my questions and comments. This can be done intelligently, but it requires original thinking. You respond with epistles.
The sense I get is that you are bookish, having studied the isms and satisifed yourself that you have found the true truth. Confronted with an ism, you have a prepared response. I won't fit an ism, because I went down a more rigorous path of truth-seeking. Using the rules of logic, observation, and reason, I continuously challenge my base assumptions. If I find a weakness, I admit to it and modify my worldview. I test the new world view to see if it better stands up to scrutiny.
My faith has survived this testing, but not as "truth". Faith by it's nature operates without evidence.