Atlas Shrugged Part 1

by littlerockguy 126 Replies latest social entertainment

  • littlerockguy
    littlerockguy

    Went and saw Atlas Shrugged Part 1 at the Rave theater here in Little Rock Friday night. I was surprised it showed here since it had such a limited showing.

    Anyway I was really surprised at how well it was done on such a limited budget and a very tight and short schedule to have the whole picture done and it really followed the book very well. I went to the 7:15 showing and the theater was packed but but not sold out. I say it did well considering no TV or print advertizing. The audience cheered and applauded at the end.

    Did anybody else here see it yet?

    LRG

  • Terry
    Terry

    I intend to see it as soon as I can.

    I've seen excerpts of scenes and they all looked consummately preformed.

    The interviews with the director convinces me he had a very sane and artistic conception of how best to bring this off.

    The critics will have their claws sharpened and minds made up before hand, of course.

    What impressed you about the film at the viewing?

  • sabastious
    sabastious

    It's being ripped to shreds by the critics.

    -Sab

  • Terry
    Terry

    Thumbnail 10:59

    John Stossel Fox Business 01-07-10 Atlas Shrugged 1 of 6

    John Stossel on Fox Business Channel. Thurs, Jan 7, 2010. Atlas Shrugged Special.

    by PenguinProseMedia | 1 year ago | 53,410 views

    Thumbnail 5:36
    On the Set of Atlas Shrugged: 53 Years in the Making
    Atlas Shrugged (PG-13) Ebert:Users:You: Rate this movie right now

    Atlas Shrugged

    BY ROGER EBERT / April 14, 2011
    Cast & Credits Dagny Taylor Schilling
    Hugh Michael O'Keefe
    Hank Grant Bowler
    James Matthew Marsden
    Ellis Wyatt Graham Beckel
    Wesley Mouch Michael Lerner

    Rocky Mountain Pictures presents a film directed by Paul Johansson. Written by John Aglialoro and Brian Patrick O'Toole, based on the novel by Ayn Rand. Running time: 102 minutes. Rated PG-13 (for some sexuality).

    Printer-friendly »
    E-mail this to a friend »

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

    I feel like my arm is all warmed up and I don’t have a game to pitch. I was primed to review "Atlas Shrugged." I figured it might provide a parable of Ayn Rand’s philosophy that I could discuss. For me, that philosophy reduces itself to: "I’m on board; pull up the lifeline." There are however people who take Ayn Rand even more seriously than comic-book fans take "Watchmen." I expect to receive learned and sarcastic lectures on the pathetic failings of my review.

    And now I am faced with this movie, the most anticlimactic non-event since Geraldo Rivera broke into Al Capone’s vault. I suspect only someone very familiar with Rand’s 1957 novel could understand the film at all, and I doubt they will be happy with it. For the rest of us, it involves a series of business meetings in luxurious retro leather-and-brass board rooms and offices, and restaurants and bedrooms that look borrowed from a hotel no doubt known as the Robber Baron Arms.

    During these meetings, everybody drinks. More wine is poured and sipped in this film than at a convention of oenophiliacs. There are conversations in English after which I sometimes found myself asking, "What did they just say?" The dialogue seems to have been ripped throbbing with passion from the pages of Investors’ Business Daily. Much of the excitement centers on the tensile strength of steel.

    The story involves Dagny Taggart (Taylor Schilling), a young woman who controls a railroad company named Taggart Transcontinental (its motto: "Ocean to Ocean"). She is a fearless and visionary entrepreneur, who is determined to use a revolutionary new steel to repair her train tracks. Vast forces seem to conspire against her.

    It’s a few years in the future. America has become a state in which mediocrity is the goal, and high-achieving individuals the enemy. Laws have been passed prohibiting companies from owning other companies. Dagny’s new steel, which is produced by her sometime lover, Hank Rearden (Grant Bowler), has been legislated against because it’s better than other steels. The Union of Railroad Engineers has decided it will not operate Dagny’s trains. Just to show you how bad things have become, a government minister announces "a tax will be applied to the state of Colorado, in order to equalize our national economy." So you see how governments and unions are the enemy of visionary entrepreneurs.

    But you’re thinking, railroads? Yes, although airplanes exist in this future, trains are where it’s at. When I was 6, my Aunt Martha brought me to Chicago to attend the great Railroad Fair of 1948, at which the nation’s rail companies celebrated the wonders that were on the way. They didn’t quite foresee mass air transportation. "Atlas Shrugged" seems to buy into the fair’s glowing vision of the future of trains. Rarely, perhaps never, has television news covered the laying of new railroad track with the breathless urgency of the news channels shown in this movie.

    So OK. Let’s say you know the novel, you agree with Ayn Rand, you’re an objectivist or a libertarian, and you’ve been waiting eagerly for this movie. Man, are you going to get a letdown. It’s not enough that a movie agree with you, in however an incoherent and murky fashion. It would help if it were like, you know, entertaining?

    The movie is constructed of a few kinds of scenes: (1) People sipping their drinks in clubby surroundings and exchanging dialogue that sounds like corporate lingo; (2) railroads, and lots of ’em; (3) limousines driving through cities in ruin and arriving at ornate buildings; (4) city skylines; (5) the beauties of Colorado. There is also a love scene, which is shown not merely from the waist up but from the ears up. The man keeps his shirt on. This may be disappointing for libertarians, who I believe enjoy rumpy-pumpy as much as anyone.

    Oh, and there is Wisconsin. Dagny and Hank ride blissfully in Taggart’s new high-speed train, and then Hank suggests they take a trip to Wisconsin, where the state’s policies caused the suppression of an engine that runs on the ozone in the air, or something (the film’s detailed explanation won’t clear this up). They decide to drive there. That’s when you’ll enjoy the beautiful landscape photography of the deserts of Wisconsin. My advice to the filmmakers: If you want to use a desert, why not just refer to Wisconsin as "New Mexico"?

    "Atlas Shrugged" closes with a title card saying, "End of Part 1." Frequently throughout the film, characters repeat the phrase, "Who is John Galt?" Well they might ask. A man in black, always shot in shadow, is apparently John Galt. If you want to get a good look at him and find out why everybody is asking, I hope you can find out in Part 2. I don’t think you can hold out for Part 3.

  • littlerockguy
    littlerockguy

    The beginning of the film takes place in 2016 and oil prices are astronomical which apparently led to using railroads again which sets well with the story about a railroad industry and Rearden steele. I liked the scenery when the train takes it's first ride on the track made with Rearden metal. It had all the political elements and their media blended in well with the story to make it all look like what we are living in today, lol.

    LRG

  • Terry
    Terry

    It is a movie that is really about ideas. This is what delayed the making of it for half a century. Who can make an interesting movie about ideas?

    So...

    the fans of the book will love it and everybody else will scratch their head and say WTF.

  • littlerockguy
  • Terry
    Terry

    Dunno...looks okay to me. I'll have to see the film for myself (if it even plays locally.)

    I hate letting critics make up my mind for me.

  • james_woods
    james_woods

    I remember that when Das Boot first came out (in German with subtitles) it was only played at "art house" theatres and was denounced as "Nazi sympathy material".

    It turned out OK once people got a chance to actually see it.

    Of course, I would admit that it may have been more exciting (submarine warfare) than Ayn Rand.

  • NomadSoul
    NomadSoul

    After I watched the movie, I went home to read the book. And the book is NOTHING like the movie! Damn books!

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit