40% of Americans Believe in Strict Creationism

by leavingwt 19 Replies latest jw friends

  • leavingwt
    leavingwt

    Four in 10 Americans Believe in Strict Creationism

    Four in 10 Americans, slightly fewer today than in years past, believe God created humans in their present form about 10,000 years ago. Thirty-eight percent believe God guided a process by which humans developed over millions of years from less advanced life forms, while 16%, up slightly from years past, believe humans developed over millions of years, without God's involvement.

    A small minority of Americans hold the "secular evolution" view that humans evolved with no influence from God -- but the number has risen from 9% in 1982 to 16% today. At the same time, the 40% of Americans who hold the "creationist" view that God created humans as is 10,000 years ago is the lowest in Gallup's history of asking this question, and down from a high point of 47% in 1993 and 1999. There has been little change over the years in the percentage holding the "theistic evolution" view that humans evolved under God's guidance.

    Americans' views on human origins vary significantly by level of education and religiosity. Those who are less educated are more likely to hold a creationist view. Those with college degrees and postgraduate education are more likely to hold one of the two viewpoints involving evolution.

    Americans who attend church frequently are most likely to accept explanations for the origin of humans that involve God, not a surprising finding. Still, the creationist viewpoint, held by 60% of weekly churchgoers, is not universal even among the most highly religious group. Also, about a fourth of those who seldom or never attend church choose the creationist view

    The significantly higher percentage of Republicans who choose a creationist view of human origins reflects in part the strong relationship between religion and politics in contemporary America. Republicans are significantly more likely to attend church weekly than are others, and, as noted, Americans who attend church weekly are most likely to select the creationist alternative for the origin of humans.

    Most Americans believe in God, and about 85% have a religious identity. It is not surprising as a result to find that about 8 in 10 Americans hold a view of human origins that involves actions by God -- that he either created humans as depicted in the book of Genesis, or guided a process of evolution. What no doubt continues to surprise many scientists is that 4 out of 10 Americans believe in the first of these explanations.

    These views have been generally stable over the last 28 years. Acceptance of the creationist viewpoint has decreased slightly over time, with a concomitant rise in acceptance of a secular evolution perspective. But these shifts have not been large, and the basic structure of beliefs about human beings' origins is generally the same as it was in the early 1980s.

    Americans' attitudes about almost anything can and often do have political consequences. Views on the origins of humans are no exception. Debates and clashes over which explanations for human origins should be included in school textbooks have persisted for decades. With 40% of Americans continuing to hold to an anti-evolutionary belief about the origin of humans, it is highly likely that these types of debates will continue.

    . . .

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/145286/Four-Americans-Believe-Strict-Creationism.aspx

  • whereami
    whereami

    I quess these guys don't know what they're talking about.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYU6ZT0wbRc&feature=grec_index

  • leavingwt
    leavingwt

    Here is what 80% believe, from the article above:

    "It is not surprising as a result to find that about 8 in 10 Americans hold a view of human origins that involves actions by God -- that he either created humans as depicted in the book of Genesis, or guided a process of evolution."

  • cantleave
    cantleave

    God it's frightening that these people can vote.

  • designs
    designs

    This explains the Rush Limbaugh show

  • unshackled
    unshackled

    This explains the Rush Limbaugh show

    ...and almost explains Glenn Beck.

  • designs
    designs

    DOH! wish I'd thought of that

  • whereami
    whereami

    http://www.john-zhu.com/blog/2009/02/10/religion-and-evolution/

    Charles Darwin would be 200 years old this week. There are a couple articles today (, LiveScience.com) suggesting that it may be time to drop “Darwinian” from in front of the word “evolution”, because, as advocates of the move argue, it implies that the theory of evolution has remained stagnant since Darwin presented it to the world in Origin of Species in 1859, and that the terms “Darwinian evolution” and “Darwinism” leave the door open for the intelligent design camp to argue that there are other types of evolution or other “-isms”.

    What really caught my eye, though, was the graphic accompanying the LiveScience.com article. It breaks down by religion the results of a survey on Americans’ views of evolution as the best explanation for the origin of human life.

    The results show that whether one believes in evolution isn’t necessarily tied to whether one is religious, as those surveyed who belong to several non-Christian religions overwhelmingly believe evolution to be the best explanation for human origins. No Christian religion, however, topped 58 percent, and Muslims came in at 45 percent.

    As for the debate over whether it’s time to lay the term “Darwinian” to rest, I think it misses the point. America’s lack of understanding about evolution won’t be cured by a change in wording. It’s about increased efforts at education and a much better showing by the scientific community in the field of public relations, where the ID camp has traditionally fared much better. I work with scientists, and I can tell you that most of them aren’t exactly great at PR or communicating scientific ideas to lay people in an easy-to-understand manner. For more on this thought, check out “Flock of Dodos”, a terrific documentary by Randy Olson about the evolution-vs.-ID debate.

  • dgp
    dgp

    I find it curious, though easily explainable, that Catholics should still believe evolution did not happen. The Pope said a few years ago that it is impossible to believe that the fossils are there just to play a bad joke on us. Of course, this is a new light of its own, so it takes time for people to grasp that.

    Now, I wonder how it can be that Jehovah's witnesses can believe in evolution. Anybody can guess how that can be?

  • dgp
    dgp

    America being such a powerful country, can you imagine the potential effect on science and free speech?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit