http://www.thehorizonproject.com/earthquakes.cfm
The link came with this message:
Think we are close to the end? NO DOUBT!
__._,_.___
by yesidid 16 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
http://www.thehorizonproject.com/earthquakes.cfm
The link came with this message:
Think we are close to the end? NO DOUBT!
__._,_.___
That's it, I'm headed back to the nearest Kingdom Hall.
thanks yesidid
I see now how easy it is to manipulate so called facts and figures and make them support apocalyptic interpretation.
Will dubs consider that these are selected earthquakes according to historical interest.
Also the figs seem to be according to how much destruction they caused. In the course of history increases in population and built up areas are of course going to influence the numbers of "deadly and destructive" earthquakes that are incorporated in the graph.
It woild be interesting to to see how population figs interact witht he graph. I don't have time this morning as I have a class.
Of course one would need information as accurate as todays going back centuries to do a real comparison,but should not a huge spike of increased Quake activity have occured around 1914 according to Dubs? Pretty flat around then according to their own graph,and anyway doesn't Jesus say wars e'quakes etc "But the End is not yet" ?
Love
Wobble
I guess they missed the new light in the WT that says earthquakes are not on the increase, and that they don't need to be for the prophecy to be fulfilled.
lol wobble
Of course one would need information as accurate as todays going back centuries to do a real comparison,but should not a huge spike of increased Quake activity have occured around 1914 according to Dubs? Pretty flat around then according to their own graph,and anyway doesn't Jesus say wars e'quakes etc "But the End is not yet" ?
well according to my theory, you have to consider that, in fullfillment of Russell's prophecy, thousands died in WW1, flu epidemics, pestilence etc. So dubs could argue the earthquakes did happen but because they weren't "deadly and and destructive" they weren't counted in. bye for now
The graph has been taken from a list of “s elected earthquakes of general historic interest" and naturally lists more quakes in the last few years and is certainly not designed to represent a comprehensive list.
The author of the email must realise this - very misleading. The WTS has admitted that there hasn’t been any noticeable increase in seismic activity in the last century.
the reason why it may look like there is an increase is because humans have become increasingly more adept at creating instruments that can measure quakes all over the world, be it in the sea, deserts, populated areas.
That graph is so deceptive it infuriates me. It is graphed as if it is a complete number of all earthquakes, whereas it is just a sampling. The website that the information is taken from actually says: