Jringe01, I was quite upfront at the beginning of the document that my intention was not to support one teaching over the other, but rather to highlight Watchtower tactics. There are difficult questions for each point of view - that is why there is ongoing debate on the subject. Maybe you could answer the question on how the Apostles could regard Jesus as G(g)od and not be breaking the law to have no other god other than Jehovah.
If you are uncomfortable with the Trinity doctrine that is your right and I respect that. But either way, I won't be promoting an organisation that uses underhanded methods to deceive its followers.
How do we honestly know that the early Chrtistians viewed Jesus as God? How do we know that it wasn't the early Church (post apostles) that didn't make the mistake of thinking Jesus was God. Truth be told since we can't ask them we really don't know for certain exactly what their views were. All that we have to go on are writings that are so old and so copied that I don't believe we can reasonably expect a definitive statement from them.
I'm not suggesting anyone promote an organization that would use underhanded tactics to decieve people but the fact is, all arguing about wording aside, I did raise some very important issues that anyone (JW or not, religious or not) considering the Trinity would do well to consider. In fact I think that in the debate over the Trinity people get caught up in the wording of various scripturtes to the point where it becomes a big complicated debate and forget there are bigger questions to be answered, questions that are more relevant to the topic that whether or not a certain word should be here, there or anywhere.
Debates over wording are useless, been there, done that and it solves nothing.
