Appellate court denies request to intervene in molestation case

by Tatiana 13 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • Tatiana
    Tatiana

    Don't know if this was already posted. If so...apologies.

    http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_D_webtestify.23d1b64.html

    Appellate court denies request to intervene in molestation case

    02:45 PM PDT on Monday, April 7, 2008

    An appellate court today denied a request to intervene in the case of a Jehovah's Witness facing child molestation charges.

    The Fourth Appellate District Division Two declined a defense petition requesting they stop Gilbert Simental's trial to address a superior court judge's ruling that orders elders from a Jehovah's Witness congregation to testify.

    The Murrieta man's lawyers Thursday asked the court to overturn Riverside County Superior Court Judge F. Paul Dickerson's decision ordering the congregation leaders to testify about admissions Simental reportedly made during an inquiry into reports of child molestation.

    "We are disappointed that they did not grant the stay and decide the issue," defense attorney Miles Clark said this morning.

    Prosecutor Burke Strunsky declined comment.

    Clark said he will ask another court to hear the defense petition and hopes to file paperwork with the appropriate court later this week.

    Simental, 49, is charged with molesting two of his daughter's friends during sleepovers at his home from July 2005 to July 2006, court records indicate. The girls were ages 9 and 10 at the time and are sisters, court records show.

    As a practice, The Press-Enterprise does not publish the names of those who are believed to have been victims of sexual abuse.

    Simental's lawyers contend the state is depriving elders and its members of the right to keep these statements confidential while giving it to others who engage in one-on-one confessions or counseling with clergy, according to court papers filed with the appellate court.

    In the Simental case, three elders formed a judicial committee to look into a report that two girls were molested.

    Simental and Elders Andrew Sinay and John Vaughn all believed their conversations were confidential. They were made during judicial committee formed in response to allegations of child sex abuse, Clark has said.

    In his ruling, Judge Dickerson said having three elders involved made this judicial committee a fact-finding body not concerned with maintaining confidentiality.

    When someone is removed from the Jehovah's Witnesses, notes from a judicial committee meeting including admissions are passed on to another committee tasked with handling the appeal. The elders must send paperwork explaining evidence presented to the Jehovah's Witnesses headquarters in New York after the person is dismissed.

    Opening statements are expected later today in Simental's trial at the Southwest Justice Center in French Valley.

  • avishai
    avishai

    Sweet.

  • restrangled
    restrangled

    How well we know this scenerio....

    In his ruling, Judge Dickerson said having three elders involved made this judicial committee a fact-finding body not concerned with maintaining confidentiality.

    Good for Judge Dickerson!

    r

  • uwishufish
    uwishufish

    Hopfully these elders incur legal expenses. This will test their faith through their wallet.

  • oneairhead
    oneairhead

    This battle is won, but the war is far from over. Hopefully this will get some traction in mainstream media.

    One

  • flipper
    flipper

    TATIANA- I hope this certainly sets a precedent for all the other Watchtower child abuse lawsuits that will be creeping out of the woodwork in the future ! I'm all for more and more elders being summoned to courts - and watch as they stumble all over their words trying to explain the freaking bizarre policies they are instructed to carry out for the governing body. Should be interesting

  • Tatiana
    Tatiana

    I am certainly following this one, flipper. I want to see fi they will actually lie on the stand and call it theocratic bullshit.

  • llbh
    llbh

    Hi Tatiana,

    Thank you for posting, i think that the courts are now seeing that the victims of these abuse cases are not the prime concern of the elders, if that were the case thier procedures would be totally different. The ruling of this court reflects this.

    Please keep us posted

    Regaards

    David

  • nelly136
    nelly136

    obviously no thought whatsoever for the victims wellbeings while they try and wheedle and delay their way round the courts.

  • Dagney
    Dagney

    Thanks for posting these. I make sure I send these to JW friend's, some I know who used to live in Murritetta (had a lot of problems with the BOE there.)

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit