The latest WT issue has on its front page the question 'What Does Creation Reveal About God'? The articles contain 'evidence' that it's possible to learn more about God's invisible qualities by observing his visible creation, thereby refuting the agnostic argument 'seeing is believing'. By the way, that's what biologists have been doing for the last couple of centuries but it hasn't brought them closer to theism.
Do you think this is a convincing argument or can it easily be rebutted? What are its strenghts and flaws? All ideas are welcome.