If you read my entire post you should find that I do not deny evolution. The difference between Scientific theory and general theory is not confusing and I take offence that you seem to beleive that I am confused.
Lumptard, you take offence very easily. My intention was not to offend and never is. If you feel I have wronged you I sincerely apologise.
You cannot revise a fact, therefore a scientific theory (e.g. evolution) is not a fact. It is accepted as fact, but based on the scientific method, it is not actually one.
Some time ago someone posted on an evolution thread giving examples of evolution actually taking place now. Wish I knew which thread it was and, if they're reading this, perhaps they'll repost the example(s) (one example was concerning plants). My own area of expertise is in ornithology and, to this end, I can cite a number of bird species that have evolved to super species level in our time, such as Serins (Serinus), like flavigula, sulphuratus, striolatus, gularis, citrinelloides and atrogularis. A further example is the black-headed canary which has recently been designated as a superspecies, i.e. a grouping of very closely related and largely allopatric birds (i.e. species or subspecies in which their ranges do not overlap, as opposed to sympatric). You may already know this but I also write it for the benefit of others. This generally means that they have common ancestry but have developed over time into true species due to their geographic isolation. In other words, the black-headed canary was once grouped with all the serins and given the scientific name Serinus alario. Now, it is known as Alario alario. This is evolution in action. (Sorry about the formatting changing).
So, from ornithological examples we can see that birds are evolving TODAY. They are still birds, of course, just as we are still primates. Therefore, evolution is accepted as fact because it is taking place all the time.
Ian