Planes just a diversion... Ambulances had bombs.

by biblexaminer 34 Replies latest jw friends

  • biblexaminer
    biblexaminer

    All good theories. But when examining the damage to the basement of the WTC from the last terrorist attack, and seeing that it handled it without too much difficulty, and also, taking into account an experts comments on a radio program that I listened to, well I don't think so.

    The expert commented that he was warning the US Government for years that an attempt would be made, and being an expert in demolition of this sort, he went on to explain the ins and outs.

    Basically, the WTC could not have been brought down except by a controlled explosion from beneath, as was tried last time.

    The expert went on that, had the terrorists placed the explosives slightly differently, the WTC would have come down last time.

    So, after watching the south tower come down LIVE on television, when the damage was up top, and the fire was minimal, I am not buying the "plane knocked down the building" stuff. AND NOT BOTH TOWERS!

  • peacepipe
    peacepipe

    Hi BE!
    Did you ever see the movie Arlington Road? If I'm not mistaken it was the world trade center in NY that got bombed in the end. It had a really interesting twist. The movie just reminded me alot of what happened today.

  • AlanF
    AlanF

    Perhaps, biblexaminer, you could explain how a building with its foundation blown out could collapse from the top down. I'm interested in the physics of this scenario.

    AlanF

  • biblexaminer
    biblexaminer

    No. I didn't see that movie. Was it good?

    Interesting too, that terrorists need only watch Hollywood movies to get ideas on how to punish the US.

  • biblexaminer
    biblexaminer

    It didn't collapse from the top. If you watch the replay, it might look like that to you because the top was on fire and as it collapsed from the bottom, the fire and smoke from the plane explosion carried down as the building sank into it's foundation.

  • Stephanus
    Stephanus

    Shades of the "second explosion" rumour which started circulating around the internet minutes after the Oklahoma bombing, BX! Can't conspiracy theorists ever accept the apparent and obvious reason for anything??

    On a positive note, it makes my heart glad to see so many ex-JWs jettisoning that last taboo and coming forward to give blood to help in this crisis - that's what true religion is all about! Tragedy tends to bring out both the best and worst in people.

    Best: "I will give blood to help others"
    Worst: "I will give "When a Loved One Dies" pamphlets out to further the Kingdom"

  • biblexaminer
    biblexaminer

    The "second explosion theory" was not something invented. AN eye-witness told about it as she was several hundred feet from the street in front of the WTC when the explosion occurred. The building then collapsed...

  • uncle_onion
    uncle_onion

    As a Firefighter we have to learn about building structures for our job.

    The trade centre is based on a steel structure. Steel has a very low heta tolerance. It is about 600C and then it loses the majority of it strength. The fires at the top caused the top to collapse and then the weight of it crashing down brought the rest down.

    UO

  • Stephanus
    Stephanus

    Aha, BX! I knew you were a "second explosioner"! LOL

    UO, I choose to believe you as a reliable source.

    Trouble is, for years now, the "exploding ambulance" theory will be doing the rounds of the conspiracy theory community!

  • Pork Chop
    Pork Chop

    The voice of reason, thank you Uncle.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit