rhett says;
"What issues have I not responded to? What pressing topics have I not answered?"
1/ Your comparison of a early-term fetus to newly born human being; what proof do you have for this assertion?
2/ What to do with the 'unwanted' babies if they were not aborted.
3/ Who would pay for this?
4/ The disruption and damage to the lives of their parent/s, who might have had the right number of children. or had children at the right time instead, but were forced to have them at the wrong time, or to have too many.
5/ The lasting damage done to the human beings born as a result of a 'no abortions' policy, knowing they were born just because of a law, and then shipped off to a home. This would probably a large institutioinalised care facility, as the first few years of no abortions would fill the back-log of couples seeking children and thereafter would be far larger than the number of couples seeking children to adopt.
Not only have you failed to prove what you say is right, you have failed to describe how the reprecussions of your opinion would be dealt with.
Remember, you can think what you like, but if you want other people to think the same, you have to prove your point.
Oh, ANSWER THE POINTS, don't just repeat yourself, or I'll not bother replying to you.
People living in glass paradigms shouldn't throw stones...
