KS10 Chapter Five Discussion

by yknot 40 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • BurnTheShips
    BurnTheShips

    So, any major changes in policy between this book and the old one?

    BTS

  • BurnTheShips
    BurnTheShips

    September 1, 1980

    TO ALL CIRCUIT AND DISTRICT OVERSEERS

    Dear Brothers:

    Keep in mind that to be disfellowshiped, an apostate does not have to be a promoter of apostate views. As mentioned in paragraph two, page 17 of the August 1, 1980 , Watchtower, "The word 'apostasy' comes from a Greek term that means 'a standing away from,' 'a falling away, defection,' 'rebellion, abandonment. Therefore, if a baptized Christian abandons the teachings of Jehovah, as presented by the faithful and discreet slave, and persists in believing other doctrine despite Scriptural reproof, then he is apostatizing. Extended, kindly efforts should be put forth to readjust his thinking. However, if, after such extended efforts have been put forth to readjust his thinking, he continues to believe the apostate ideas and rejects what he has been provided through the 'slave class, then appropriatejudicial action should be taken.

    As can be seen in this letter just disagreeing with a WT doctrine can end up with judicial action being taken.

    Orwellian! "Thoughtcrime does not entail death, thoughtcrime IS death"

    BTS

  • BluesBrother
    BluesBrother

    This file is no longer available because of a claim by Watch Tower Bible.

    Darn ! I should have taken it yesterday ....

  • dssynergy
    dssynergy

    I bet more than a few new elders were delighted to see this - I imagine there will be a few wives who get to look at this page of the book:

    Paragraph 5:

    Oral & Anal sex is ok as long as YOU ARE married to each other.

  • donuthole
    donuthole

    Paragraph 5:
    Oral & Anal sex is ok as long as YOU ARE married to each other.

    This is not a change. Their stance for more than a few years is that oral and anal sex between married individuals is not pornea. If you engage in such sex-acts with your spouse you will not be brought before a JC on charges of fornication. Although I haven't seen it touched upon yet in the book there may still be other consequences such as losing privileges of service.

  • leavingwt
    leavingwt

    5. Por·nei'a: (Lev. 20:10, 13, 15, 16; Rom. 1:24, 26,
    27, 32; 1 Cor. 6:9, 10) Por·nei' a involves immoral use
    of the genitals, whether in a natural or in a perverted
    way, with lewd intento There must have been another
    party to the irnmorality-a human of either sex or
    a beast. Willing participation incurs guilt and requires
    judicial action. It is not a casual touching of
    the sex organs but involves the manipulation oE the
    genitals. It ineludes oral sex, anal sex, and manipulation
    of the gen itals between individuals not married to
    each other. (Iv p. 99; w06 7/15 pp. 29-30; w04 2/15
    p. 13; wOO ll / l p. 8 par. 6; w83 6/1 pp. 23-26) Pornei'a
    does not require skin-to-skin contact, copulation
    (as in penetration), or sexual climax.

    Paragraph 5 is not a change, nor does it express an approval of oral or anal sex between married persons. The 1983 WT magazine remains the latest word on this topic. The WT considers oral and anal sex between married persons to be perverted.

    (By definition, married people cannot commit porneia with each other. The very definition of the word implies that someone outside of a marriage is involved.)

  • sir82
    sir82
    Pornei'a
    does not require skin-to-skin contact

    It seems my copy of the Kama Sutra is outdated....

  • AnnOMaly
    AnnOMaly

    Pornei'a does not require skin-to-skin contact

    Yeeeah. Perhaps I've led a sheltered life; perhaps I'm lacking in imagination; but how could that work exactly?

  • lrkr
    lrkr

    It means they can df you for porneia for getting a lap dance!

  • freddo
    freddo

    Or if young bro Hardcock shoots his load while dryhumping his girlfriend ...

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit