I think there's a difference between deliberate subliminal messages in art work and what we see in nature, clouds etc. The hand with the baby seems deliberate but it also could be a coincidence.
I agree on this point. In this case, the face is not "subliminal" at all, there is on question there is a face in a hand that doesn't belong there. Maybe the flying figure next to it might be considered "cryptic" and semi-subliminal, but the fact that if this is a reference to the sleeping prodigal son image the anointed see then one would expect the bird figure to accompany the face in some way. The test would be whether or not that cryptic flying bird has an understandable alternative purpose in the picture in general; that is, was it necessary for some other reason and just coincidentally looks like a bird? I don't think so.
The "subliminal" part is that the face is connected to the messiah by being in his hand. What does a sleeping black child's face next to a bird have to do with the messiah, and particularly while handing John the scroll? This is a chronological event. In the end times, the seals of the scroll are broken by the messiah at the second coming. Thus the entire "subliminal" message would be that the sleeping black child is the messiah who reveals the hidden secrets of the scroll, etc.
The cloud picture: I do have a vivid imagination and I can see what could look like a young boy but only because you say so. What I also see is a very large foot, pig's nostrils, a cute dog with white hair and black eyes or is it some white bird landing with wings spread. I even see a Koala bear but this is just my imagination. I know these aren't signs. You look hard enough you will find something.
YES, absolutely. I can pick out and make up all kinds of other images as well. But the key thing is whether or not there is a sleeping black face or not? In this case, I see two eyes, bulbous in nature compared to the face, clearly a child's face, whose eyes are closed and wit a cute little nose and a rather distinctive childlike mouth. I suppose lots of infants have a mouth like this as a child but...
So this starts to add up and the "coincidences" a little too many. The child's face could have had only one eye instead of two. It would have been depicted with white clouds instead of black clouds. The eyes could have been open, not closed. Plus there is a bird in the imagery. A second image, which relates directly to the second coming, representing holy spirit coming down out of heaven. The bird is in silhouette and with wings spread showing it is descending. So it's not just a bird on a wire or phone pole or a birds head, this is a bird doing something specific. Also, there is a river of fire up from which a body rises. That is specific to the refrence of Zech 3 where it says Jerusalem is like a log snatched out of the fire. The Jews are also the "messiah" of the world since through them comes salvation. They are also like the prodigal son because they left God's covenant and were abandoned. But following the severe blow of the HOLOCAUST where two-thirds of their numbers were exterminated, God restored their position and restored them to their homeland. Thus they were like a "log snatched out of the fire" just like the prodigal son. This is specific as well since the Bible says, "unless the days were cut short NO FLESH WOULD BE SAVED", which is a reference to the potential of WWII destroying all the Jews if the Germans won the war. So you have three images, all interrelated and specific to the second coming. This goes beyond randomness. This is the "sign of the son of man." The duplication of this imagery in the Revelation book proves it is seen by other anointed ones who understand its significant relationship to the messiah at the second coming. That is, this face is not in some bush growing in the yard of someone we see being witnessed to -- just a face where it doesn't belong not connected to anything in particular. Instead this is specifically in the hand of Jesus. And why is this face also black and also "sleeping"/dead? Also with a bird nearby? Too many details here for this to be written off as a "coincidence." This picture PROVES someone at WTS headquarters, that is Fred Franz knew about the belief of some anointed ones that the messiah would appear in the flesh as the black gay prodigal son. As further proof you have this additional not-so-sublminal artwork, cleverly referencing Revelation where it says the messiah would be "Impaled in SODOM"... meaning his homosexuality is what causes him to undergo a spiritual death.
Therefore, with the WTS, you have another issue to deal with. The face in the hand is not the only indication that the WTS understood that some were interpreting that Jesus was gay at the second coming. A "dog" in the Bible is a reference to homosexuals who use male prostitutes dressed as women. Paul was gay as well and his weakness is called his "thorn in his side". So the very clevery WTS came up with showing Jesus IMPALED on a cross with a dog in his side, representing homosexuality as the thorn in his side. It's not that hard to figure out. But it proves they certainly read between the Biblical lines too and understood the possibility of Christ arriving in the flesh in the body of a gay JW. So this has to be COMBINED with the other messiah-related artwork. This impaled messiah represents the dead prodigal son impaled by his homosexuality. Lazarus' sores that keep him out of the Rich Man's estate, represents the disfellowshipped messiah, and his sores being licked by dogs, shows his weakness for men who like cross-dressers, thus the love for those men and his homosexuality is what impales him, kills him spiritually, causes him to leave the truth even though he loves Bible knowledge. The Writing Committee, which analyzes every single verse in the Bible and implies all kinds of interpretations and how it applies to the WTS specifically would not have missed this. It's too obvious Lazarus in the bosom position of the father is linked to the messiah. In fact, THEY claim Lazarus represents the WTS and the Rich Man represents Christendom. But since they don't want the followers to even THINK about the possibility of Christ returning in the flesh, and certainly not someone who likes "dogs" (bisexual men), they put this type of stuff in their "subliminal" art as they monitor for this possibly coming true, especially since they have anointed members contacting them about seeing this "sign of the son of man" in the form of the sleeping black child. So the WTS has a public communication system, and they hide certain things quite conveniently in their artwork, things they don't dare mention or articulate with words, but are concerning issues, nonetheless.
So anybody can look away from all this. It's all quite "interpretive". But for the anointed and the Writing Comittee who clearly understand the potentiality of the second coming being in the flesh and them being wrong about it, it is clear what these images relate to. You have to consider this from MY POSITION. Someone of the anointed who thinks the "sign of the son of man" is a sleeping black child accompanied by a bird and that the messiah as Lazarus would be "impaled" by his homosexuality, represented by the love of "dogs" in the scripture and that the WTS is totally unaware of these concepts and that the two separate pieces of artwork with the "subliminal" images have absolutely nothing to do with Christ returning as a black gay male. It's just TOTAL COINCIDENCE. Like Russell being buried next to a Freemasonry seeing-eye pyramid, as if the headstone factory just happened to have run out of any large headstones and the only one they had left and available on discount was the seeing eye pyramid so the WTS was forced to use it to mark Russell's grave, not knowing it was a secret symbol of the Freemasons? I don't think so.
The lying, evil-slave WTS Freemasons don't fool us. We can tell what they are up to when it's this obvious.
JCanon
