Sad emo,
my understanding is that the bible was inspired by god in order to benefit humans. Why would god inspire his servants to write things about god ‘in a (seemingly) bad light’ knowing they will not understand it in this life. Who is benefited by this? Has this not caused confusion and discouragement? I my case it has. I wonder why God would want me to read and follow his written word, when he knows my conscience can’t agree with his violence and evil and yet expect me to display ‘the fruitage of the spirit’? I should hope that something that is clearly evil is actually good and accept this mainly for the reason that I am only human. Why did he inspire ‘it’ in the first place? So we don’t know why god inspired the ‘bad light’ neither do we know how to harmonize it with the ‘good light’.
“For God is not [the author] of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.” (1 Cor.
“All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.” (2 Tim. , 17 KJV)
Your analogy is good I used to use it in FS. –But, the young child only needs to grow older, it does not need to become a doctor or something close to that so as to get the bigger picture and understand this ‘bad’ was necessary for the long tern good. What I’m trying to say is, using human limitations as an explanation for the disharmony of scripture is a poor excuse and does not help me build faith in the bible. I have done away with blind obedience and explaining away contradictions just because of wanting to hold on.
Freetosee