Convicted Molester Sentenced to 45 Years to Life (Simental in Murietta, CA)

by jamiebowers 26 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • jamiebowers
    jamiebowers

    http://www.pe.com/localnews/rivcounty/stories/PE_News_Local_N_witness28.471157c.html

    Part of what the prosecutor said: "This case makes a bold statement to any religious organization that we are not going to allow you to abuse confidentiality privileges in order to suppress the confessions of child molesters," said Strunsky. "The stakes are way too high."

    The creep said: "The jury was made up of mostly women, so there were lots of emotions," Simental told Meeks. "I'm sure as much as he (the judge) tried to be a good judge, I think he was biased." ISN'T THAT JUST LIKE A TYPICAL JW MAN, BLAMING WOMEN FOR HIS PERVERSIONS!

  • aSphereisnotaCircle
  • blondie
    blondie

    Convicted molester sentenced to 45 years to life

    10:52 PM PDT on Friday, June 27, 2008

    By TAMMY J. McCOY
    The Press-Enterprise

    A Murrieta man used his daughter's slumber parties to satisfy his perverted desires, a judge said Friday, then ignored calls for mercy and sentenced the 50-year-old father to a prison term of 45 years to life.

    "The court has little doubt that if released he will move immediately to molest little children," Judge F. Paul Dickerson III said. "The court feels there are other victims out there who have not come forward."

    Dickerson said he was compelled to impose the harshest penalty, given the pain defendant Gilbert Simental inflicted on the girls and the peril he would pose to children if released.

    In April, a jury at the Southwest Justice Center in French Valley convicted Simental of molesting two sisters, then ages 9 and 10, on separate occasions in 2005 and 2006.

    Story continues below

    The Press-Enterprise does not routinely publish the names of minors who are victims of sexual abuse.

    Prior to sentencing, defense attorney Miles Clark and eight of Simental's friends and relatives asked the judge to be lenient with Simental, repeatedly describing him as a good man who made a bad mistake.

    "Continuing to love in the face of something terrible . . . that's what is important, that we continue to love one another," Simental's 22-year-old son, Alex Simental, said. "I ask for your mercy."

    Later, the father of the two victims expressed anguish and rage that his daughters were sexually violated by a family friend.

    He applauded his daughters for having the strength to endure so much, including testifying before a jury of strangers about intimate facts that children should not have to discuss.

    "My daughters . . . in time will recover from their ordeal," he said.

    During his trial, Simental admitted that he twice molested the younger girl but he denied abusing her older sister.

    Leaders of Simental's congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses contradicted his statements and testified Simental, during the course of their religious inquiry, admitted touching both girls.

    Prior to the trial, the case broke new legal ground in California about when statements made to clergy members are deemed confidential, prosecutor Burke Strunsky said.

    "This case makes a bold statement to any religious organization that we are not going to allow you to abuse confidentiality privileges in order to suppress the confessions of child molesters," said Strunsky. "The stakes are way too high."

    Elders John Vaughn and Andrew Sinay balked at testifying against Simental, when subpoenaed by Strunsky. They cited the confidentiality afforded by the penitent-clergy privilege.

    Dickerson ordered them to testify after finding the Jehovah's Witnesses' judicial committee system is not designed to keep information confidential.

    As a result, the penitent-clergy privilege does not apply since state law protects statements made to clergy members who are required by their faith's practices to keep them secret.

    While Simental did not make a statement on his own behalf Friday, he said he did not get a fair trial when interviewed for a pre-sentencing report filed by Deputy Probation Officer Julia Meeks.

    "The jury was made up of mostly women, so there were lots of emotions," Simental told Meeks. "I'm sure as much as he (the judge) tried to be a good judge, I think he was biased."

    Simental will be in court July 28 in connection with another molestation case against him involving another girl.

    Reach Tammy J. McCoy at 951-375-3729 or [email protected]

    alt

    alt



    Most Recent Comments: 3 Fritz 1 hour ago wrote:

    Since when does a "jury of mostly women" make a difference? Is he suggesting women can't make a fair decision because they are emotional?


    Recommend Report Abuse


    Tex Mex 2 hours ago wrote:

    Terrible, grown wimp crying, what about the little kids that he has scared for life.

    what a creep


    Recommend Report Abuse


    Janice Taylor 7 hours ago wrote:

    The Jehovah Witness elders had tried to avoid testifying by claiming clerical privilege, but the judge ruled spoke with them in a group setting, not a confessional setting.

    FINALLY, the courts are seeing the judicial committee does not have clerical exemptions!!!!
    Maybe now, more children and their families will receive justice.

    PRAISE THE LORD ABOVE!!!!

  • aSphereisnotaCircle
    aSphereisnotaCircle

    Yeah, people get so emotional about child abuse,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, especially those women!

    Just remember, Men think, and women feel. ( I heard this countless times growing up a dub)

  • carla
    carla

    45 years! and another case coming up right behind this one and still he can't see what he did was pure evil.

  • wha happened?
    wha happened?

    He doesn't see it and apparently neither do all the JW's that testified in his behalf. How could they stand up in court and plead mercy for this piece of crap? I would love for one of them to come to my door. They would certainly get an earful.

  • Quandry
    Quandry

    Elders John Vaughn and Andrew Sinay balked at testifying against Simental, when subpoenaed by Strunsky. They cited the confidentiality afforded by the penitent-clergy privilege.

    Jehovah's Witness do NOT have a clergy class......unless it's convenient.....and fits the theocratic warfare strategy.....

  • Not Feeling It
    Not Feeling It

    While the ruling against the pervert, molester is great news, I think that the bigger story is the judge's decision to require the elders to testify. This will be big for future cases to hopefully ensure there is some SERIOUS thought before any elder decides not to notify proper authorities.

    I'd love to read more legal opinion on that ruling.

  • JK666
    JK666

    How would you like to go door-to-door in Murietta? Murder and child rape are what the JW's are noted for in that community. And the elders that tried to keep from testifying are almost as disgusting as the perv that did these acts.

    JK

  • wha happened?
    wha happened?

    There was a condo project in our territory where the previous year to me moving to the congregation, two sisters killed a man. It's been years and as far as I know, the congregation still won't work that condo project.

    I agree on the significance of that ruling. The courts are circling in on responsible parties. I remember reading on this earlier how the parents told the school officials not to let him near their children and the school officials called the police. This hiding stuff will be a thing of the past for elders.

    I you are an elder and u either know of or dealt with one of these sickos then I suggest you come forward now and report before the person strikes again and u are named as a individual who knew and yet did not come forward. May the civil suits begin.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit