Anderson Appeal Ltrs -Adversarial WT

by silentlambs 26 Replies latest jw friends

  • silentlambs
    silentlambs

    May 23, 2002

    Mrs. Barbara Anderson
    c/o Jerre Michael Hood
    Attorney at law
    124 First Avenue N. W.
    Winchester TN. 37396

    Dear Mrs. Anderson,

    In harmony with Our conversation on May 17, 2002, the continuation of your judicial hearing was held n Sunday May 19, 2002.

    The decision rendered by the judicial committee was to disfellowship from the congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses on the charge of causing division.

    If you wish to appeal the decision you may submit a written letter of appeal to L. Seely within seven days. You should state clearly your, reason (s) for requesting an appeal.

    Sincerely,
    Larry Seely
    PO box 275
    Tullahoma TN, 37388

    _______________________________________________

    Barbara J. Anderson

    May 30, 2002

    To: Manchester Congregation Judicial Committee

    Dear Brothers,

    I Barbara Anderson, wish to appeal the disfellowshipping decision of 5-19-02, which I received notification of on May 28, 2002. I wish to appeal for the following reasons:

    1. There has been no disfellowshipping offense committed by me.

    2. I deny committing any wrongdoing worthy of disfellowshipment from Jehovah's Witnesses.

    3. I firmly contend that speaking out to media in order to protect children of Jehovah's Witnesses from Watchtower policy is not causing divisions or apostasy, thus it is not a disfellowshipping offense,

    4. I have never spoken about the problem of sexual child abuse within the organization of Jehovah's Witnesses to anyone before I spoke to the media, hence no witnesses could be produced that said I had, thus I have never caused divisions among Jehovah's Witnesses. I spoke to the media only to protect myself due to the lies spread about me by J, R, Brown, spokesman for the Watchtower Bible & Tract Society, when he said the congregation was investigating me, Bill Bowen and Pandelos for committing "spiritual violations" and "sins" and not for speaking out to Dateline. He also said that headquarters didn't know I was going to appear on Dateline and that is a lie in that headquarters sent a personal e-mail to the Manchester Congregation some eight months ago where I said in it that I had spoke to Dateline,

    I further request that all communication be conducted with my attorney, The telephone call to me from Larry Seely did not honor previous demands for all communications to go through my attorney only.

    Very truly yours,

    Barbara J. Anderson

    ----------------------------------------

    June 5, 2002

    Dear Sister Anderson;

    Thank you for your letter dated May 30, 2002, that was delivered to us by Brother Anderson, As per your written request, an appeal committee is ready to meet with you regarding your appeal of the judicial committee decision. The meeting has been set for Saturday, June 8, 2002, at 2:00 P.M. at the Manchester Kingdom Hall located at the intersection of Bowling Alley Road and Highway 55, Manchester, TN. If you are unable to meet at that time, you should personally contact the chairman of the committee.

    We note that you letter said that you prefer to communicate with the committee through your attorney. We fail to see why this is necessary or even needed. Your status as one of Jehovah's Witnesses is an internal matter, not involving Caesar's purview. What is more, your meeting with the appeal committee is not adversarial. Your meeting with the appeal committee is for the spiritual purpose of deciding whether a serious error in judgment was made by the judicial committee that met with you earlier.

    You state in your appeal that you did not commit any offense for which you should be disfellowshipped. This is a spiritual, rather than secular, question which the appeal committee will examine. If the appeal committee determines that the judicial committee did not make a serious error in judgment in this regard, the spiritual question of whether or not you were repentant will also have to considered.

    We trust this explains why the involvement of an attorney is unnecessary and why we are communicating with you directly rather than through an attorney. Of course, Brother Anderson, as your husband, is welcome to be at this meeting with you.

    Your Brother,

    R. E. Matthews
    Chairman, appeal committee

    P.S. As a courtesy we are providing Mr. Hood with a copy of this letter,

    cc Jerre Michael Hood, esq,

  • Grout
    Grout

    Damn, they just ignore the attorney request. That's bold...ly stupid.

    --
    Chip Salzenberg: Free-Floating Agent of Chaos

  • TheApostleAK
    TheApostleAK
    We note that you letter said that you prefer to communicate with the committee through your attorney. We fail to see why this is necessary or even needed. Your status as one of Jehovah's Witnesses is an internal matter, not involving Caesar's purview. What is more, your meeting with the appeal committee is not adversarial. Your meeting with the appeal committee is for the spiritual purpose of deciding whether a serious error in judgment was made by the judicial committee that met with you earlier.

    You state in your appeal that you did not commit any offense for which you should be disfellowshipped. This is a spiritual, rather than secular, question which the appeal committee will examine. If the appeal committee determines that the judicial committee did not make a serious error in judgment in this regard, the spiritual question of whether or not you were repentant will also have to considered.

    We trust this explains why the involvement of an attorney is unnecessary and why we are communicating with you directly rather than through an attorney. Of course, Brother Anderson, as your husband, is welcome to be at this meeting with you.

    In other words you want to have a kangaroo court again.

    Let the media know about this.......these guys hate it.

    From AK

  • dungbeetle
    dungbeetle

    WHEN the governmental police start investigating Watchtower's role in criminal conspiracy regarding children, these refusals of Watchtower to respect the legal procedures of the U.S. government and the rights of its citizens WILL BE OF INTEREST to the investigating arm of law enforcement.

    These religious maniacs are gonnna get the WRONG specially appointed prosecutor mad at them. Then GOD HELP THEM--of course He WON'T just as He didn't help them during the Nazi Regime.

    Harumph...

    BEFORE YOU TRY AND REMOVE THE STICK FROM MY ARSE, REMOVE THE TELEPHONE POLE FROM YOUR OWN ARSE.

  • Cassiline
    Cassiline

    May 23, 2002

    Mrs. Barbara Anderson
    c/o Jerre Michael Hood
    Attorney at law
    124 First Avenue N. W.
    Winchester TN. 37396

    Dear Mrs. Anderson,

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    June 5, 2002

    Dear Sister Anderson;

    Why do they call her Mrs.Anderson in the first letter, but in the second, Sister Anderson?
    Is this formality once someone has decided to appeal a JC's action?

    {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{ Barbara }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

    C

    When the pain of being where we are, becomes greater than our fear of letting go...we will risk and heal and grow.

  • Guest 77
    Guest 77

    Your paying attention Cass.

    The replied letter was well written. "...the spiritual question of whether or not you were repentant will ALSO have to be considered." My, my, my. What does she have to be repentant about? For telling the truth? I thought the truth was suppose to set you free not imprison you.

    Yes, this issue of disfellowshipping needs to be properly addressed. The elders are being influenced by headquarters. I wonder 'if' these brothers (elders) decided to make decisions on their own, would the org. consider them dissenters and creating disunity?

    Guest 77

  • seedy3
    seedy3

    AK,

    You spelled that wrong, it is spelled Kangaroo Kourt, you used a proper C in court, and being this is not a proper funtion it should be given due respect of spelling it "Kourt". LOL J/K he he he he

    Seedy

  • funkyderek
    funkyderek
    We fail to see why this is necessary or even needed

    Isn't that statement repetitive, redundant and duplicative? [8>]

    --
    Bad times, hard times - this is what people keep saying; but let us live well, and times shall be good. We are the times: Such as we are, such are the times. - St. Augustine, 354-430

  • Farkel
    Farkel

    : the spiritual question of whether or not you were repentant will ALSO have to be considered.

    This, of course clearly shows that the appeals committee already considers Barb guilty. If she was to be considered otherwise until the matter as adjudicated, repentence would not be an issue.

    Kangaroo courts. Kangaroo appeals courts. Dubland. Insanity.

    Farkel

  • Nathan Natas
    Nathan Natas

    The JC letter says, "Your meeting with the appeal committee is for the spiritual purpose of deciding whether a serious error in judgment was made by the judicial committee that met with you earlier."

    Uhhh... I thought Barb was not present at the meeting. So how could they say, "...met with you earlier"?

    - Nathan Natas
    UADNA (Unseen Apostate Directorate of North America)

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit