MemberPostViewed: times
LennyinBluemontPedophilia Summary


I’ve read Barbara’s intro to the pedophile records and thought it might be useful to have a record here on the forum of the most damning and verifiable facts regarding the pedophilia situation. Sort of a summary. That way we can all have a source to go to and be able to quickly summarize what’s criminal about the way the Society has used it’s authority in this matter. Anybody interested in vetting this? Barbara?

  1. Court records prove that the Watchtower HQ appointed men to positions of authority, as a matter of policy, who were known to have either confessed to or been accused of pedophilia, provided the three year waiting period had been met.
  2. Even when a prominent District Overseer wrote to the Society (letter in court records) suggesting this policy be discontinued in 1994, the Society continued with the policy at least until 2000.
  3. The Society has implemented a policy whereby any alleged victim of child abuse who either (a.) speaks to others of their experience, or (b.) goes to the authorities to report their experience, is routinely disfellowshipped if there were not two witnesses to the event.
  4. The Society’s KHAA insurance fund, which is in place to provide insurance for Kingdom Halls, and for which each congregation is billed $4.50 per publisher per month (or is it year?), has been used for years to pay settlements to victims of abuse by those in authority in the congregations (elders and MSs), to the tune of millions of dollars.
  5. The Society’s legal department deviously designated the Society’s service department as it’s client in order to take advantage of attorney/client privilege in keeping all communications between the two (obviously the most damning of evidence) out of the court’s jurisdiction.
  6. The Society’s legal department, when dealing with cases where the jurisdiction required reporting all cases of child molestation to the Police, routinely instructed the elders in those cases to notify the Police anonymously from a pay phone booth. Of course, this made it very difficult for the Police to follow up in any investigation being unable to communicate further with the one making the report.
  7. When giving advice to local elders in these cases, the Service Department would rountinely ask the elder inquiring, whether the alleged victim had been "somewhat at fault."
  8. The Society has an extensive database containing records of all reports turned in by congregations with information on a large number of accused, confessed or convicted pedophiles. Requiring and maintaining this type of information brings responsibility upon the authority requiring and maintaining it. This information has never been used to notify authorities, who may have then acted to prevent further crimes. This information has never been shared with local congregations affected, so that parents could take actions to protect their children from pedophiles right in their congregations. As a consequence of these policies, there are cases where molestations continued for years, and in congregation after congregation as the pedophiles moved around the country.
  9. In February of 2007, after four years of battling the courts and motions filed by Plaintiffs, the Society quietly settled 12 cases in California, the estimated cost being $13 million.
  10. Unlike the Catholic Church, when settling these claims, the Society made it a requirement that the victims remain silent about their experiences for the rest of their lives, effectively "gagging" them.
IP: IeLuKHFwkOMpSwsf
candidlynutsRe: Pedophilia Summary
  1. The Society has an extensive database containing records of all reports turned in by congregations with information on a large number of accused, confessed or convicted pedophiles. Requiring and maintaining this type of information brings responsibility upon the authority requiring and maintaining it. This information has never been used to notify authorities, who may have then acted to prevent further crimes. This information has never been shared with local congregations affected, so that parents could take actions to protect their children from pedophiles right in their congregations. As a consequence of these policies, there are cases where molestations continued for years, and in congregation after congregation as the pedophiles moved around the country.
    excellent summary especially the above one.
IP: apNgZuukVAL/hM4k
DogpatchRe: Pedophilia Summary

 

http://www.watchtowerdocuments.com/

Randy

Thanks for the summary!

IP: eywG2sKVpYMbGZkQ
LennyinBluemontRe: Pedophilia Summary

Hmmm.  Doesn't seem to be much interest.

The purpose here is that if someone (particularly a JW) confronts you about this issue, you can have at your ready a concise list of issues based upon, not opinion, but court documents.  Each of the ten points shows the unethical, immoral manner in which the WT has handled this issue over the course of many years.  Thought it would be useful.

Correct point 9 to read "nine cases in California, Texas and Oregon." (per Barbara) 

Thanks, Barbara!

Anyone feel free to add, delete, correct.

IP: +NqX1dogfDdWxU1P
mind my ownRe: Pedophilia Summary

This will come in handy for sure!  Thanks so much!

MMO

IP: 15aLv69WngIY/jDq
DannyHaszardRe: Pedophilia Summary
Good to know bravo!
IP: sB/fRqpqo5P+j29U
DannyHaszardRe: Pedophilia Summary
IP: sB/fRqpqo5P+j29U
GillRe: Pedophilia Summary

Lenny - I have some questions.

With regard to the 'insurance poicy' that all KH's have with the WTBTS - Do all congregations everywhere including the UK have this insurance policy?  Is it specifically in this policy that they are paying out towards out of court settlements for pedophilia?  Does that mean then, that the WTBTS has not had to fork out of its own pocket for these settlements or has it been using these insurance payments mainly?

IP: TCtRDSNmnt35yes1
fullofdoubtnowRe: Pedophilia Summary
Thanks for this Lenny, very good summary
IP: sDVJqN/g05R1rjkH
LennyinBluemontRe: Pedophilia Summary

Don't know what the arrangement is in the UK.  But that has been the arrangement here in  the US for many years.  Per Barbara, court documents indicate that the argument was made that since the Society collected premiums in California in order to provide insurance coverage for congregations there, they were de facto, in the insurance business in California.  This apparently made it more difficult to claim confidentiality with regard to some documents the court was seeking.  Who would like to find the specific locations that support these points in the documents Barbara uncovered? It would be nice to have scans of these to accompany this thread.

IP: +NqX1dogfDdWxU1P
ClamRe: Pedophilia Summary

 

Cheers Lenny - That's a keeper.

Clam

IP: O/30SxGYwlROfddL
GillRe: Pedophilia Summary

Lenny - Thanks!

However, since 'insurance' is a business and not a charity I must assume that the WTBTS pays taxes on its insurance business......or would I be wrong?

Does this also mean that each and every publisher is insured by the WTBTS?  Can they claim against the WTBTS if they have an accident at the KH or on the way or is the general public insured 'against' any damage done by publishers?

IP: TCtRDSNmnt35yes1
Seeker4Re: Pedophilia Summary
Very nicely done, LennyinB. We need to be compiling more threads like this where we break down and catalog the info from the court documents.

S4
IP: NC58N6Kur91OD8GK
bluesapphireRe: Pedophilia Summary
BTT I want to keep this at the top for people to add.  I haven't been able to get into the CD and so this is very helpful.
IP: JagaWcJpHvmbdeCE
OUTLAWRe: Pedophilia Summary
Jehovah`s Witness`s are being billed $4:50 "Each" to pay for Pedophiles???..LOL!!..Thats just OUTRAGEOUS!!!!..Does anyone know if thats "Per Month" or "Per Year"?...OUTLAW
IP: lUCFZZW+NhbTigYy
joelbear69Re: Pedophilia Summary
such a shame.
IP: so918F84ILbUoISv
sir82Re: Pedophilia Summary

I believe it is $4.50 per publisher per year. The congregation can pay it all at once or in monthly installments.

I seem to recall when the arrangement first came out, I was accounts servant, and had to explain it to the congregation in a service meeting part. I distinctly remember being forcefully told NOT to refer to the KHAA as an "insurance" program.

IP: AjWwyYVdJNb6fr6j
WarrenRe: Pedophilia Summary

Hi Lenny,

Thanks for the information. Can you tell me the source for the claim of a 3 year waiting period? I've been to the Silent Lambs website and read a letter from the Society that mentions a 20 year waiting period. I've never heard of a 3 year waiting period. An elder guilty of adultery can't be re-appointed for 10 years. I find it hard to believe a child molestor would have less of a penalty. I don't think a person that has molested a child should ever have a position in the congregation.

Best regards,

Warren

IP: crNOC3HSgUC5ZKEe by Warren: Correct formatting
by Warren: Correct formatting
Doubting BroRe: Pedophilia Summary

Regarding the KHAA:

I was accounts servant, and had to explain it to the congregation in a service meeting part. I distinctly remember being forcefully told NOT to refer to the KHAA as an "insurance" program.

Sir82 is technically correct. My understanding is that the KHAA is what is referred to as a self insured trust. This trust is a method of financing risk and is typically used by large corporations. There are advantages and disadvantages to this structure and typically (but not always) there will be an insurance policy of some sort sitting above the trust. Its quite difficult for religious organizations of any size to buy sexual molestation coverage due to all the lawsuits in recent years. The intent is to "assist" kingdom halls with their liability and also property claims. I do know that the legal department will issue a certificate of insurance on behalf of congregations when necessary (like when a group of congregations rent a building for a CA/SAD or memorial). Still there duties that insurance companies have that the WTS doesn't take on by financing their risk via a trust as opposed to forming a captive insurance company. Anyway, the unction is still the same to pay claims.

However, since 'insurance' is a business and lot a charity I must assume that the WTBTS pays taxes on its insurance business......or would I be wrong?

They don't pay taxes because its technically not an insurance company (one of the advantages of running it as a trust)

Does this also mean that each and every publisher is insured by the WTBTS?  Can they claim against the WTBTS if they have an accident at the KH or on the way or is the general public insured 'against' any damage done by publishers?

I seem to remember a case a few years ago in FL ?? where there was an auto accident out in service and the plaintiff dragged the WTS in. I believe the WTS got themselves dismissed because they said the publishers were acting on their own speaking to their neighbors about the Bible (which is a load of crap because the WTS provides the materials, methods, assigns territory to congos, etc). With that being said, had the WTS been found liable for the actions of a member of the congregation (more likely that it would involve elders, MS & pioneers since they are "appointed" by the WTS not by the local congregation), then yes the KHAA is where the money would come from. Although I don't have first hand information, I'd bet my house that's where the settlement money came from.

I know of situations where there was a claim involving a person who fell on KH property and they were going to bring action against the congregation. There is a form that each congregation has to complete and send to the legal department when something happens at the KH. Pretty standard stuff for a large corporation with mulitple locations.

IP: cSByiZsvwKgvbZ9M
greendawnRe: Pedophilia Summary
I think what all this scheming boils down is the objective of evading the payment of compensations to victims something they finally failed to achieve.

It shows how the WTS is a self serving org, especially that two witness rule which makes it impossible to catch any pedophile and therefore put the WTS at risk of paying out money.

They really know how to twist the Bible to their ends. If the courts thought that way no pedo would ever get condemned since they are usually smart enough not to strike with witnesses around.

Did they ever DF anyone for making child abuse accusations without the required two witnesses?
IP: JuIDX1qxboPimoVE