Open challenge to "Dr" Rolf Furuli and Greg Stafford - DEBATE.

by Focus 36 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • Focus
    Focus

    Open challenge to "Dr" Rolf Furuli and Greg Stafford - ONLINE DEBATE on Watchtower Insanity.

    Furuli seems to have gone to ground entirely, pushing only IKEA and his presumed misconstructions of cuneiform text.

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/bible/218342/1/What-happened-to-Rolf-Furuli

    Stafford, OTOH, has apparently moved entirely away from the Watchtower, perhaps even disassociating himself in so doing.

    If so, he owes me a personal apology and thanks to me for helping him get out by gently showing him the errors of his ways. He had lost his debate with AlanF and then I demonstrated that, leaving aside the Koine, Greg apparently didn't even know the difference between a phrase and a clause in his own mothertongue, English. Needless to say, the dubdub didn't accept his error, and further remonstration ensued before he scarpered.

    And then the TravisJ45 incident. I'll let the Prominent Bethelite relate, in his own inimitable style, what transpired:

    Post from the H2O archives:

    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    Subject: "Stafford Wins..Now what?"
    Posted by TravisJ45 [GregStafford] on November 03, 1999 at 07:53:07
    {eZOTANvCI6/CPYT8orz2XxZ4XktaQ.}:
    I spent all day yesterday and most of the night reading through Greg
    Stafford's responses to AF. I am currently a member of a JW congregation
    but over the years I have had doubts about some things. I still do. But as
    far as this debate between Greg and AF goes Greg wins. To me AF's
    arguments are not that strong and he comes across a bit arrogant. I am not
    sure if I am more impressed with Greg's patience or his ability to argue.
    I honestly cannot see the point in continuing this debate. I recommend AF
    step out of the debate circle and let someone like COJ debate Greg about
    something like the gentile times chronology. Or maybe we can hear more
    about the blood issue. I for one do not plan on reading through nearly 100
    pages of this debate again!
    TJ45
    -----------------------------------------------------------------

    This was received at 7:53:07 a.m. (H2O time).

    Then when the message appeared on his screen, this idiotic Jehovah's
    Witness must have realized that the game was up as his real handle
    (GregStafford) had shown up (on the post, and on the index of posts) in
    square brackets next to the assumed extra handle (TravisJ45) - H2O allows
    dupe-handles, but reveals the main one (especially to prevent this sort of
    abuse).

    Realizing that there was no time to contact a Moderator (H2O is run by
    fellow JWs) and get it all deleted before the message got seen by
    "apostates" AS THIS WAS A PEAK TIME OF THE DAY (indeed, the message got
    its first reply at 8:02:52 a.m. - less than 10 minutes later) - together
    with the giveaway ("[GregStafford]"), the shameless CHEATER then posted a
    second post about 10 minutes after the first one - to whit:-


    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    Subject: Take a hint, please...
    Posted by TravisJ45 [GregStafford] on November 03, 1999 at 08:03:18
    {eZOTANvCI6/CPYT8orz2XxZ4XktaQ.}:

    Events have happened that jeopardize his presence here, but that can be
    overcome, as you now see. See below for more on AF.
    Greg would rather move on to something else, but there is a new procedure
    he must follow. Any questions, please email me. I have the details.
    TJ45 (?)
    -----------------------------------------------------------------


    Firstly, this #2 post explains nothing - and IN NO WAY lets Greg Stafford
    (Cheater) off the hook.

    On this second post (not the predecessor) an email address appeared -
    [email protected] - significantly, not the email he uses for posts
    which he intended to show originating from himself (viz:
    [email protected])

    An obvious shoddy cover-up of a botched attempt at CHEATING.

    Why else would it have been in TWO posts? At 8:03:18 a.m. (or slightly
    earlier, as the time is H2O time), the posting-receipt time for this
    second post he would *NOT* have had time to SEE, READ and RESPOND to the
    first reply to his first post (H2O receipt time 08:02:52 a.m., sender:
    "Friend"). So any claim the second Stafford post was to explain the
    "misunderstanding" over the first one FAILS MISERABLY - for this to
    happen, the TOTAL of ALL the times for:-

    (a) H2O to place "Friend"'s post on the BB after receiving it;
    (b) Stafford to refresh his H2O screen and notice the response, allowing
    for Internet timing delays;
    (c) Stafford to read the response (which spotted the botched forgery);
    (d) Stafford to consider what and how to respond;
    (d) Stafford to type out a 4 or 5 line response 9as above - not a short
    one);
    (e) Stafford to send this response to H2O; and
    (f) Stafford's response to travel across the net and be received by H2O.

    must be no more than 27 seconds (YES - IN TOTAL!!!!!!) - the difference
    between 8:02:52 and 8:03:18, plus a second in Stafford's favour for the
    maximal rounding difference..

    LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! LOL! MMM-LOL! LOL!

    WOW! We knew the Light flickered for these crazy JWs - a change in policy
    every now and again - but this is ridiculous!


    Well, so Stafford's second post was CLEARLY NOT IN RESPONSE to the first
    response to his first post.

    So, was it "second thoughts" - in just 10 minutes?

    Sure it was - triggered by the appearance of the unexpected
    "[GregStafford]".

    Stands to reason it is nothing else.

    That this cheat has written a couple of ~30,000 character (!!!)
    explanations for "what really happened" speaks for itself. The truth, my
    friends, is usually much shorter than "the truth" ;-)

    He tried to cheat, and got caught.

    Well, Greg Stafford, in my eyes and that of all right-thinking people, you
    a MISERABLE CHEAT and a LOSER.

    I will be contacting the News Services (using the non-angelic channels I
    developed when I conributed to their coverage of mass- and child- murderer
    Jwhovah's Witness Mark Barton) to ensure this fiasco by the JW's most
    visible apologist and defender gets the news coverage it deserves -
    SANCTIMONIOUS HUMBUG CAUGHT CHEATING!

    Not to mention the Borg. I look forward to greeting you as an ex-JW, soon.

    And, as you know, Greggie - the message has been copied to you too. Please
    do respond to the NGs. had you simply responded when caught with an "I'm
    sorry" I would have let you be. Your credibility is sub-zero, and falling
    like... mercury ;-)

    Remember, folks - the Watchtower Society of Jehovah's Witnesses is a SHAM
    and a FRAUD from start to finish. They have been caught CHEATING and LYING
    and WRITING NONSENSE any number of times - explore the links in my sig for
    just a few (hundred) examples. So, it is hardly surprising when their most
    "Prominent" (LOL!) Current Public Apologist also gets caught CHEATING.

    Love

    Prominent Bethelite.

    --

    Focus

    ("PB" Class)

  • Calebs Airplane
    Calebs Airplane

    Sadly, Rolf Furuli is just a cheap immitation of Frederick Franz (if that's even possible). However, he is just a one-trick pony hired by the Tony the Turd to conjure up more BS about 1914, whereas Whacky Freddy could down a bottle of scotch and come up with instant theocratic BS in a matter of minutes without skipping a beat.

  • yadda yadda 2
    yadda yadda 2

    That old thread is from 1999. Errm..you need to let it go dude.

  • blondie
    blondie

    Perhaps you could reach Greg at:

    http://elihubooks.blogspot.com/

  • designs
    designs

    1999

  • blondie
    blondie

    Last entry was 2014

  • JWdaughter
    JWdaughter

    Wow, this whole thing looks more personal than it is about coming to an answer or a winner of a debate. Someone just wants to argue (and yes, it takes one to know one!)

  • AnnOMaly
    AnnOMaly

    I cannot make head nor tail of what this is about, Focus - gusting into the forum after a decade, unearthing long dead threads and airing grudges from obselete DBs dating from 1999? WTH? If you want an apology or thanks for whatever, contact Stafford directly. Find him on Facebook. Go to his site, email him.

    Furuli isn't a "Dr." but a Dr. It's a real doctorate from the University of Oslo. What your challenge is to him, I'm not clear. Care to summarize?

    AF's around - just not on JWN anymore.

    Ann (of the 'bemused and amused' class)

  • Focus
    Focus

    Sadly, Rolf Furuli is just a cheap immitation of Frederick Franz (if that's even possible). However, he is just a one-trick pony hired by the Tony the Turd to conjure up more BS about 1914, whereas Whacky Freddy could down a bottle of scotch and come up with instant theocratic BS in a matter of minutes without skipping a beat.

    Calebs Airplane, you sure got his number OK. Carl-Olof Jonsson and I have laughed about RF's "research" (sic) before. Perhaps if Furuli learns that IKEA may get to know more about the person they so wisely chose to be the face of their advertising, he might come out from under his rock and defend his past.

    That old thread is from 1999. Errm..you need to let it go dude.

    Why, yadda yadda 2 ? Stafford was the "intellectual" (LOL!) "justifier" of the Sicksiety for over a decade. In 1999, we - I was part of it - demonstrated beyond the shadow of a doubt that he was either a cheat or a liar. Why is that not still relevant 15 years later? If he has reformed, why has he not apologized for what happened? Let alone for his other transgressions?

    Perhaps you could reach Greg at: http://elihubooks.blogspot.com/

    blondie, like the other ***hole, he appears reluctant to come out to play... well, in my book he is bloodguilty for many jW kids who needlessly died because of the evil whoreganization's blood transfusion policies, as his arguments in favour of insane Watchtower doctrines may have prevented various parents from seeing the light and thus saving their child's life.

    I wouldn't waste my spit on ****, ******* ****** **** like him, except I am happy to make a public fool of him and humiliate him - any time. It doesn't take much doing, as hs estimation of his own "abilities" is not in accordance with that which Goobergawd actually endowed him.

    The abilities which he had in ample supply was arrogance and audacity. Alan Feuerbacher will, if contacted (he is online, I believe), either be willing to take on the fool again - or happily hand over that task to me.

    Wow, this whole thing looks more personal than it is about coming to an answer

    Yes, JWdaughter. I take the death - indeed, in effect murder - of kids very personally. How silly of me.

    AnnOMaly, the point is that "Dr." Furuli's conduct was wholly inconsistent with that of a disinterested scientific analyst. Until he recants, I will apostrophise.

    C-O J showed that, on the balance of probabilities, Furuli ignored, suppressed, contrived to misinterpret or somehow ""missed"" data that refuted the Watchtower's demonic eschatology, pinned as that is on a start point date re the fall of Jerusalem. The WTS got it wrong by twenty years, and stuck to the wrong date (conventional historians are absolutely as one with respect to this) with the help of Furuli's demented babbling.

    http://www.607v587.com

    Bloodguilty too, by my book. There's no statute of limitations when kids die needlessly.

    __

    Focus

    ("Justice" Class)

  • AnnOMaly
    AnnOMaly

    he is just a one-trick pony hired by the Tony the Turd to conjure up more BS about 1914

    Furuli and his chronology 'research' long predates AMIII.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit