QFR: "Warning - memorial partakers might be loonies!"

by cedars 46 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • cedars
    cedars

    As part of my objective analysis of four month's worth of Watchtower study editions from July to October 2011, I found the following gem from a Question From Readers, on page 22 of the August 15 magazine. The question under discussion was "How are we to understand the figures in the annual service report?", and it goes on to provide an idiot's guide to what the figures mean, including the following...

    "Memorial partakers. This is the number of baptized individuals who partake of the emblems at the Memorial worldwide. Does this total represent the number of anointed ones on earth? Not necessarily. A number of factors - including past religious beliefs or even mental or emotional imbalance - might cause some to assume mistakenly that they have the heavenly calling. We thus have no way of knowing the exact number of anointed ones on earth; nor do we need to know. The Governing Body does not keep a list of all partakers, for it does not maintain a global network of anointed ones."

    This disclaimer has obviously been made in an attempt to extinguish any curiosity as to why the number of anointed "remnant" on the earth is apparently increasing rather than decreasing - from a steady 8000 (or so) to 11,202 (according to 2010's figures). In the past, any decrease has been hailed as justification for increased anticipation that the end is near. Look at this quote from page 31 of the 1981 Yearbook:

    Over the past seven years, from 1974 to 1980 inclusive, Jehovah’s Witnesses have made steady progress. Their growth is healthy. Only as to Memorial partakers has there been a gradual decline, which is in accord with Scriptural expectations.

    If a decline in partakers is "in accord with Scriptural expectations", then surely the current increase is against scriptural expections. It's therefore perhaps to be expected that the Society has now changed it's tune and said that the number of memorial partakers is of no particular relevance at all.

    This aside, the Question From Readers article opens the door to some intriguing questions....

    • If partaking at the memorial is something that one might do mistakenly because he/she is mentally or emotionally imbalanced, what assurances do we have that individual members of the Governing Body themselves are not suffering from similar delusions? How is there any way of knowing for sure either way?
    • If memorial partakers as a whole are to be openly discredited, shouldn't the validity of Governing Body members as anointed co-rulers with Christ be similarly open to scepticism?
    • Given that memorial partakers might be partaking unworthily, shouldn't elders be questioning these individuals congregation-by-congregation to ascertain their state of mental/emotional health, particularly in the light of Paul's words at 1 Corinthians 11:27, "Consequently whoever eats the loaf or drinks the cup of the Lord unworthily will be guilty respecting the body and the blood of the Lord."

    I would raise these questions with the Governing Body directly in writing, but apparently I'm no longer allowed !

    Thoughts please!

  • nugget
    nugget

    So they acknowledge that partakers are baptised individuals. As baptised people they will have been thoroughly vetted as to their understanding of the annointed and the implications of partaking inappropriately. So their reasons for the increase are spurious.

    The numbers are going up and there is no way to justify it.

  • cedars
    cedars

    Indeed - no instructions are given in this article as to the ramifications of partaking unworthily, which inevitably applies to any baptised publisher who partakes whilst being fully aware of the difference between a member of the other sheep and the little flock. It's almost implied that to do so would be of little consequence, despite Paul's dire warning in the scripture quoted above.

  • Nabeena
    Nabeena

    They have been saying that in other words since around 1982 or so, but not quite so blatantly. Hmm.

  • Mary
    Mary
    A number of factors - including past religious beliefs or even mental or emotional imbalance - might cause some to assume mistakenly that they have the heavenly calling.

    LOL.....Finally---some acknowledgement that Herd, Jackson, Splane or any of the other morons who make up the Slobbering Body Mumbles are 'emotionally unbalanced nutters.

  • FatFreek 2005
  • james_woods
    james_woods

    We thus have no way of knowing the exact number of anointed ones on earth; nor do we need to know. The Governing Body does not keep a list of all partakers, for it does not maintain a global network of anointed ones."

    Which would bring up the logical question - then what in the hell are they carefully counting the number of partakers for?

  • cedars
    cedars

    Good point, I feel it's almost inevitable that they will stop counting altogether soon, or at least publishing the results - especially if the number continues to increase. What shocks me is the unexplained aversion to finding out who the partakers are, and even openly trying to discredit them. Basically the only legitimate members of the anointed are the Governing Body - and the other 11,190 may well be regarded as phoney.

  • james_woods
    james_woods

    It has been over 30 years since I have looked at one, but I seem to remember that the publisher's record card held in the congregation files had an entry for "annointed or other sheep".

    If so, (and if it is still there) then they are not technically telling the truth about not keeping records on who the "annointed" are.

  • stillstuckcruz
    stillstuckcruz

    I love your posts. I may start my own in-depth analysis's of the WT. anyway, great find. If asked those three questions, my guess is that most JW's would say that Jehovah would not have allowed the GB to reach that position if they were not really annointed. That His "holy spirit" led them to such a position so that they could lead and guide God's people by means of the F&DS. No way Jah would let a non-annointed be up there. Thats my opinion on what most JW's would say in answer to those questions. By that logic, they could also say that theres no need for heavily scrutinzing and questioning every supposedly annointed individual. God will "reveal" in His own due time.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit