king james version job 6:6. can that which is unsavory be eaten without salt?
or is there any taste in the white of an egg?.
new world translation "watchtowers version" job 6:6. will tasteless thing be eaten without salt , or is there any taste in the slimy juice of a marshmallow?.
It now reads the same as the NIV one of Christendoms bibles !
It uses Mallow
jtg
P.s. check the bible hub site for other renderings,,,, I think its Biblos.com.
Just type in the scripture and you're away !!!!!
Edit ,,, yes the old nwt used marshmallow,
the new nwt uses mallow
being a jw is amazing!
who agrees with me??.
the jw is a protection from the world.
How fast can you dig a bomb shelter FL_Panthers????
jtg
hey everyone!
i haven't posted here in a while, over a year i think.
just goes to show where i'm at in the recovery stage.
I'm finding this thread very interesting.
It's got me thinking about how this would apply if a congregation had a "constitution"?
For example, in Australia the individual congregations had to unanimously accept a
congregation specific constitution in order to continue recieving the
Charitable Institution Tax concession.
I noticed therein that members were described as 'active publishers' of the so and so congregation.
So, does the congregation's constitutional description have any bearing on this threads direction?
I'm thinking,,, ok if I am not an active publisher then I have no rights that a member would have, or be
subject to any "treatment" that a member would. If I write a letter stating my resignation from the
membership that should be the end of it, shouldn't it?
LIke as a financial or non financial member of an organisation that describes membership criteria.
Just wondering.
jtg
you know you have been out of the organization for some time when no members of the present governing body were "ruling" during your sojurn.
i have tried to keep up with who is a member and learn a bit about each one.. of the current crop, i find anthony morris iii to be the most grating and irritating to listen to.
who do you find the most annoying?
Ha ha,
When you return and see the gb issuing decrees that seem
unreasonable from the human viewpoint we've always had
causing difficulties and you start looking around wondering
" When's 'Paul' going to go up to Brooklyn and sort these guy's out?"
( Or did he try and they booted him out?)
jtg
Its still there with the old last days and 1914 generation statements.
It hasn't been sanitised yet.
The insight online has revised the sodomite resurrection question
to the latest idea: will not be resurrected.
jtg
P.S Go onsite to publications, online library then research guide
under the publications tab and type in last days.
i wonder, is this a new doctrine and when did "reason and scripture" take place.. .
page 25 paragraph 10 dec 15 2013 study wt.
10 the bread that the apostles could see and would soon partake of meant jesus body.
@ leaving.
No I don't believe you are off topic as, due to reason and scriptural references,
you have no choice but to ask as you have.
You have succinctly expressed my and no doubt other thinking
searchers' thoughts. The light seems to be getting fuzzier.
Is it the new energy saving globes or what ?????
jtg
i wonder, is this a new doctrine and when did "reason and scripture" take place.. .
page 25 paragraph 10 dec 15 2013 study wt.
10 the bread that the apostles could see and would soon partake of meant jesus body.
Oh well,
Just broke the O.P.'s rule/request ,,,(insert smiley face)
jtg
i wonder, is this a new doctrine and when did "reason and scripture" take place.. .
page 25 paragraph 10 dec 15 2013 study wt.
10 the bread that the apostles could see and would soon partake of meant jesus body.
Thank you all for ya comments.
I'm like "why include such a vague statement anyway?"
Ok ok it proves nu lite that. as Bobcat pointed out
everyone had already figured out.
Bobcat, thank you for the references I checked them found the language 'interesting also.
Sparra,,, ha ha, I dig anyone Foxy. My head is spinning so maybe I should
have an Oxynorm, apparently good for instant pain relief.
jtg
i wonder, is this a new doctrine and when did "reason and scripture" take place.. .
page 25 paragraph 10 dec 15 2013 study wt.
10 the bread that the apostles could see and would soon partake of meant jesus body.
I wonder, is this a new doctrine and when did "reason and scripture" take place.
Page 25 paragraph 10 dec 15 2013 study wt
10 The bread that the apostles could see and would soon partake of meant Jesus’ body. Which body? At one time, God’s servants felt that because Jesus broke the bread but none of his own bones were broken, the bread meant “the body of the Christ,” the congrega- tion of anointed ones. (Eph. 4:12; Rom. 12:4, 5; 1 Cor. 10:16, 17; 12:27) In time, however, it was appreciated that both reason and Scripture indicate that the bread represents Jesus’ human body, which had been prepared for him. Jesus “suffered in the flesh,” even being im- paled. Thus, at the Lord’s Evening Meal, the bread represents that physical body in which Jesus “bore our sins.”—1 Pet. 2: 21-24; 4:1; John 19:33-36; Heb. 10:5-7.
(italics mine)
Thanks in advance
jtg
i remember talking to a highly educated man out witnessing once and the subject.
of freedom of religion came up.
the guy simply asked if the freedom of religion we.
Too true sparrow, the seemingly benign elements often produce the most profound thoughts.
jtg
