I have many holes in my understanding, but cannot deny that which I have experienced
Beautifully stated. Thank you for your clarity.
If more Christians believed as you do, I might be more inclined to give their world-view credence. However, in my experience, the vast majority behave as Love_Truth or Rick Warren (A Purpose Driven Life). That is, they believe that God only responds to humans who hold a certain set of beliefs.
As a Jehovah's Witness, I was taught that God would only accept worship/prayers from those who used the name "Jehovah", believed in the interpretation of scripture given by a collection of geriatric racists in Brooklyn, attended a Kingdom Hall, and preached the docterines of Jehovah's Witnesses every chance they got. Anyone else was unacceptable.
Rick Warren believes that only people who accept Jesus Christ as the God-Son and Savior are able to have a realtionship with God.
Radical Islamics believe only those who follow the strict teachings of the Koran can find favor with God.
My point in entering this (already thoroughly discussed) issue was simply to put into perspective what Czar purported to be absolute proof of the existence of a personal God, ie: the answer to his prayers. I found his logic to be vastly flawed, especially given the circumstances with which he believes he received help.
The irony is....my world view allows for you and other Christians to practice your faith, as long as it does not restrict my freedom not to. If your belief system makes you a happy and functional person, I'm thrilled for you. Conversely, in the view of fundementalists, such as my previous religion, I am viewed as doomed and without purpose. I find that offensive.
On that note, I leave this discussion. Along with Ros, I view your type of Christianity to be the least offensive. Oh that you were in the majority!
Wasa