"they still didn’t engage with any real criticisms (like the 607 BCE doctrine, the Australian Royal Commission, the UN NGO affiliation, etc.)."
What do you expect them to engage about with those topics? 607 BCE is when the gentile times started even if Jerusalem was destroyed in 587. The ARC is in the past. Bygones.
Same with the UN NGO thing. more bygones. It is not bad to be an NGo of the UN.
"But the “apostate’s” reasoning was surprisingly grounded. He said things like “I’m keeping an open mind and finding answers to my questions,” and “How do you know it’s garbage if you haven’t even read it?”"
But what is the point in bringing those things up? Instead of sending material or links to videos, I say to just live your life like you want to.
"And here’s what’s wild: the PIMI character had no actual arguments. He just shut the conversation down and threatened to report the guy."
What was there to argue about?