i intend for this to be one of a series of bite-sized ops on the evidence for evolution.. introduction to dna genes are sequences of dna made up of words (codons) each of which are three letters (bases) long.
there are only four letters in the genetic alphabet (acg&t) each word or codon is the recipe for one amino acid.
there are 20 different amino acids in living organisms.
He would gladly debate them in a professional manner. But Aron tells you in the video he posted that he was against that.
Absolutely.
1. Aaronra makes the point that if there was any credibility to ANY creationists position they could submit papers for peer review.
2. Hovind lost all credibility when he went to jail for tax fraud. He was never in the game to begin with, so why give him any credibility now?
Which if you read my original post on Dawkins was my exact point in the first place.
i intend for this to be one of a series of bite-sized ops on the evidence for evolution.. introduction to dna genes are sequences of dna made up of words (codons) each of which are three letters (bases) long.
there are only four letters in the genetic alphabet (acg&t) each word or codon is the recipe for one amino acid.
there are 20 different amino acids in living organisms.
If you don't post or understand the videos you post on behalf of your position. I have a hard time believing you watched all of Hovinds videos.
Every single video that Hovind ever made? I think I would commit suicide. Or genocide.
But I did suffer through the seven hour DVD series that came out some years before he was sent to jail for tax fraud, where he expounds the Hovind theory. The agony was excruciating.
i intend for this to be one of a series of bite-sized ops on the evidence for evolution.. introduction to dna genes are sequences of dna made up of words (codons) each of which are three letters (bases) long.
there are only four letters in the genetic alphabet (acg&t) each word or codon is the recipe for one amino acid.
there are 20 different amino acids in living organisms.
I have watched Aarona.
And you're still a creationist? Well then I won't discuss it with you any further. LOL
i intend for this to be one of a series of bite-sized ops on the evidence for evolution.. introduction to dna genes are sequences of dna made up of words (codons) each of which are three letters (bases) long.
there are only four letters in the genetic alphabet (acg&t) each word or codon is the recipe for one amino acid.
there are 20 different amino acids in living organisms.
.You should watch the videos you post before you post such damning information about your position.
Perhaps you should try reading my posts. Just above the video:
I stand corrected: Aaronra won't debate him either.
i intend for this to be one of a series of bite-sized ops on the evidence for evolution.. introduction to dna genes are sequences of dna made up of words (codons) each of which are three letters (bases) long.
there are only four letters in the genetic alphabet (acg&t) each word or codon is the recipe for one amino acid.
there are 20 different amino acids in living organisms.
I don't believe humans evolved from animals. Why? Because animals don't destroy their environment, animals aren't greedy, nor do they or smoke crack then go knock over a liquor store. Humans are worse than animals. Humans are more akin to viruses and locusts then animals.
i intend for this to be one of a series of bite-sized ops on the evidence for evolution.. introduction to dna genes are sequences of dna made up of words (codons) each of which are three letters (bases) long.
there are only four letters in the genetic alphabet (acg&t) each word or codon is the recipe for one amino acid.
there are 20 different amino acids in living organisms.
If you believe in evolution you believe you came from a rock.
If you believe in creationism you definitely believe you came from a rock.
You clearly have not thought about your position thoroughly at all.
i intend for this to be one of a series of bite-sized ops on the evidence for evolution.. introduction to dna genes are sequences of dna made up of words (codons) each of which are three letters (bases) long.
there are only four letters in the genetic alphabet (acg&t) each word or codon is the recipe for one amino acid.
there are 20 different amino acids in living organisms.
I don't want to discuss anything with you.
Oooooooh. So if Cofty watches all the videos and still supports evolution you would also have nothing to discuss as well I guess? So isn't your challenge deceptive?
I'll tell you this, if you read an agreed on serious book on the subject of evolution and you were still a creationist, I would be tickled pink to discuss it with you.
So why won't you discuss Hovind after I actually did the work?
i intend for this to be one of a series of bite-sized ops on the evidence for evolution.. introduction to dna genes are sequences of dna made up of words (codons) each of which are three letters (bases) long.
there are only four letters in the genetic alphabet (acg&t) each word or codon is the recipe for one amino acid.
there are 20 different amino acids in living organisms.
I stand corrected: Aaronra won't debate him either.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKw8K7o-vwY
So I wonder who I was thinking of...
i intend for this to be one of a series of bite-sized ops on the evidence for evolution.. introduction to dna genes are sequences of dna made up of words (codons) each of which are three letters (bases) long.
there are only four letters in the genetic alphabet (acg&t) each word or codon is the recipe for one amino acid.
there are 20 different amino acids in living organisms.
But even the great Dawkins will not take on the lowly high school science math teacher Kent Hovind.
You know Ken Hovind has absolutely nothing to lose by boasting he will debate Dawkins.
Who is Kent Hovind? A tax evading convict who spews a lot of nonsense.
Dawkins can only damage his reputation by debating Hovind. Not because he has anything to fear, he has debated much more cogent opponents. By debating Hovind he automatically gives him some form of credibility. Why do that at all?
But you know who has taken up the challenge? YouTube's Aaronra.
He has publicly challenged Hovind to a debate anywhere and anytime. And Hovind knows this very well and is very quiet.
i intend for this to be one of a series of bite-sized ops on the evidence for evolution.. introduction to dna genes are sequences of dna made up of words (codons) each of which are three letters (bases) long.
there are only four letters in the genetic alphabet (acg&t) each word or codon is the recipe for one amino acid.
there are 20 different amino acids in living organisms.
But it's equally foolish not to acknowledge that all statements are subject to revision, including scientific ones. History is replete with examples. We don't need to be experts in evolutionary biology to know that.
Slimboyfat, let me put in the first revision. Just because information gets refined and knowledge expanded, it does not mean that old information becomes totally invalid. Newton is just as valid today as three hundred years ago. Sure its been refined, but it has not been discarded. Darwin made many conjectures about evolution, and he has turned out to be more right than wrong on many occasions.
