many believe in the wonderful drama of evolution (life evolving from non-life through flower/fruit beautiful trees and variety of species, reaching homo sapiens and finally returning to non-life) through various processes such as mutation, adaptation, natural selection .... yet there is an evil spirit working against the very spirit of the evolution, producing ironical results in too large a scale.
to mention a few:.
1) the really superior beings are kept sidelined (http://thoughtcatalog.com/lorenzo-jensen-iii/2015/07/17-ways-that-science-proves-women-are-superior-to-men/).
Thus religions nor evolution are the answer.
You know what evolution says about the existence of God?
Absolutely nothing. It is neither for or against it.
God could have set the whole universe in motion and Universal Darwinism is just a fundamental algorithm that is used to drive the entire process.
What is interesting though is what it would say about the fundamental nature of God.
many believe in the wonderful drama of evolution (life evolving from non-life through flower/fruit beautiful trees and variety of species, reaching homo sapiens and finally returning to non-life) through various processes such as mutation, adaptation, natural selection .... yet there is an evil spirit working against the very spirit of the evolution, producing ironical results in too large a scale.
to mention a few:.
1) the really superior beings are kept sidelined (http://thoughtcatalog.com/lorenzo-jensen-iii/2015/07/17-ways-that-science-proves-women-are-superior-to-men/).
What if we are awakened to another state of consciousness of different plane/dimension.
Sounds a bit like Plato's cave.
Ths is not to say that this world is not real, but to show the limitations of our physical senses which some of the people view them as ultimate source of knowledge/experience.
Lets assume you are absolutely correct. One is in a dream/simulation until one awakens.
Even if that were the case the dream/simulation still has rules and one still has to play the game according to those rules. Whether literal or a dream, the outcome is still the same. You have to play the game optimally and therefore you have to understand the parameters and limits. No-one explained the rules so the best way to figure them out is to test for rules e.g. experimentation and observation.
I do not take the Genesis account of creation which is the fabrication of later writers, according to Jeremiah 7:22; 8:8
Then why are you such a skeptic when it comes to evolution? It seems that it forms a part of the fundamental rule set. The evolutionary algorithm is being observed in all disciplines. Anywhere where entropy and information enthalpy interact (which is everywhere), you have the potential to observe evolution.
many believe in the wonderful drama of evolution (life evolving from non-life through flower/fruit beautiful trees and variety of species, reaching homo sapiens and finally returning to non-life) through various processes such as mutation, adaptation, natural selection .... yet there is an evil spirit working against the very spirit of the evolution, producing ironical results in too large a scale.
to mention a few:.
1) the really superior beings are kept sidelined (http://thoughtcatalog.com/lorenzo-jensen-iii/2015/07/17-ways-that-science-proves-women-are-superior-to-men/).
The books Cofty recommended to me have been incredible learning experiences
Yeah Cofty takes evolution seriously serious.
He checks every evolution comment for accuracy :)
Universal Darwinism is my pet love. Its popping up everywhere in almost all disciplines.
i started working on this chart 5 years ago.
i didn't think i'd have to update it again so soon.. .
linky in case image doesn't show below.
I like the 1979 Watchtower. Almost like celebrating a birthday.
And the 1897 reference. They've come a long way with this damn generation.
And the 1995 teaching Ah hahahahahahaha
Good work and well done.
i started working on this chart 5 years ago.
i didn't think i'd have to update it again so soon.. .
linky in case image doesn't show below.
I posted the direct link.
Where? :)
Oh.... on the pic itself.... um thanks. Report back when I've read it.
i started working on this chart 5 years ago.
i didn't think i'd have to update it again so soon.. .
linky in case image doesn't show below.
i started working on this chart 5 years ago.
i didn't think i'd have to update it again so soon.. .
linky in case image doesn't show below.
Impressive.
Is the LARGE print edition available so I could read it? :)
many believe in the wonderful drama of evolution (life evolving from non-life through flower/fruit beautiful trees and variety of species, reaching homo sapiens and finally returning to non-life) through various processes such as mutation, adaptation, natural selection .... yet there is an evil spirit working against the very spirit of the evolution, producing ironical results in too large a scale.
to mention a few:.
1) the really superior beings are kept sidelined (http://thoughtcatalog.com/lorenzo-jensen-iii/2015/07/17-ways-that-science-proves-women-are-superior-to-men/).
Great posts, love em and couldn't agree more. Too bad they'll be lost on icon ...
many believe in the wonderful drama of evolution (life evolving from non-life through flower/fruit beautiful trees and variety of species, reaching homo sapiens and finally returning to non-life) through various processes such as mutation, adaptation, natural selection .... yet there is an evil spirit working against the very spirit of the evolution, producing ironical results in too large a scale.
to mention a few:.
1) the really superior beings are kept sidelined (http://thoughtcatalog.com/lorenzo-jensen-iii/2015/07/17-ways-that-science-proves-women-are-superior-to-men/).
Iconoclastic, are you a Hillary supporter? :)
Human history has had exceptionally strong female leaders: Margaret Thatcher, Queen Elizabeth 1, Angela Merkel (although she's been battered of late) and Paris Hilton.
There are fundamental differences between the sexes regarding power though:
Here's a very crude proverb: Men rise to power to have sex, women have sex to rise to power.
This saying is politically incorrect but demonstrates how the 2 sexes fundamentally differ regarding their objectives and inherent value. Men have no inherent value and have to earn their power and therefore the right to reproduce. The reason for this is simple: a single male can fertilize many females, therefore only one is actually needed.
many believe in the wonderful drama of evolution (life evolving from non-life through flower/fruit beautiful trees and variety of species, reaching homo sapiens and finally returning to non-life) through various processes such as mutation, adaptation, natural selection .... yet there is an evil spirit working against the very spirit of the evolution, producing ironical results in too large a scale.
to mention a few:.
1) the really superior beings are kept sidelined (http://thoughtcatalog.com/lorenzo-jensen-iii/2015/07/17-ways-that-science-proves-women-are-superior-to-men/).
Social equality is great. It has doubled the human work force.
However males are physically dominant and females are genetically dominant.
See my quote from the Royal society and my added footnote.
