Nathan Natas,
Thanks again. I just listened to Fridays and I'm SO upset I can't even think straight right now.
Before I head to bed and for now, I will say this. If a JW who is 14 years old sets a bulding on fire, I'd be willing to bet that his JW gardian or parents whould say " well, he's ONLY A 14 YEAR OLD CHILD! He's immature!
One other thing is that it would be nice if JWs would state which is true....accepting a blood transufusion is against thier faith, or that accepting a blood transfusion is not going against ther faith, but is a conscience decision. Seems the JWs who phoned in are not in "unity" as JWs calim to be.
Either way, I don't think the judge made the right decision in letting a 14 year old child make that life or death decsion for himself. Had he truly been raised that accepting a blood transfusion is a conscience decision, he probably would have treated that as he had other "conscience decsions" the GB allow it's adherents/JWs to make. He would have not treated accepting a blood transfusion as a sin in which he would have needed to prove to those who hold the title of elder in his congregation that he was repentent for.
I'm tired and realize I'm getting carried away, so I'll say goodnight and see what others here have to say. It's a SAD situation! I hope that aunt can someday forgive herself for teaching the teachings of the GB to her nephew.
peace and goodnight,
somebody/gwen