i recently saw on a website where a guy i know posted a link to a video by graham hancock.
now this guy is a nutjob kind of like the ancient alien guys.
this pyramid has been a fascination of crackpots for years.
It is said that you do not understand a theory if you cam not express it in numbers. So: By the way: what is the difference between Numeracy and Numerology?
There is great stuff in astronomy that is not directly linked to outworking of laws:
The bode "law"
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/doing-the-numbers-on-no-1.160798/
The beauty of numbers in astronomy is, that it is an exact science, and facts behind the data are in existence since millions of years. hard to fudge.
today a large article was published in a dutch newspaper 'dagblad van het noorden'.
it is about frank huiting, the reclaimed voices foundation and the adopted motion in parliament.
the branch office has given a reaction:.
But even 301 cases of whatever kind of abuse, waton, need to be investigated (and I doubt that most are statutory rape or voyeurism).
absolutely, and details publicized, perhaps the best way to deter any and all act out their drive, and harm more.
And bring back the death penalty, that wt advocates even for whole families in their Armageddon doctrine.
today a large article was published in a dutch newspaper 'dagblad van het noorden'.
it is about frank huiting, the reclaimed voices foundation and the adopted motion in parliament.
the branch office has given a reaction:.
one of the problem in all these communications is the deliberately vague terms that have been concocted.
sexual abuse can be anything from voyeurism, to rape, or consensual sex with an 17. 95 year old. Illustration:
Trudeau up for groping 18 years ago, vs cigar incident of Bill Clinton. not minor but vague.
i'm an atheist as i do not see any evidence for the existance of a god.
i encourage critical thinking in everyone and am ready to debate anyone on whether or not there is a god and what that god might be like.
hmu..
Krauss is very explicit about what he means by 'nothing'. He does NOT mean two energies existed balancing each other at all.
No energy, no time, no matter - NOTHING!
He uses 240 pages to redefine nothing, as a void seething with activity, virtual particles popping in and out of existence.
The Pre- Big bang workshop is full of potential. and we have not touched Roger Penrose yet.
The BB, and Evolution are latecomers to the saga of existence. The gods question even later.
i'm an atheist as i do not see any evidence for the existance of a god.
i encourage critical thinking in everyone and am ready to debate anyone on whether or not there is a god and what that god might be like.
hmu..
galaxies that collided. Yep total proof there’s a god and he has complete control of his creations.
Our most advanced science is done by collisions,-- of Protons.(slightly smaller)
Collisions might be one of the most advanced tools in the creator's arsenal too!
a galactic collision is a fly-through by the way. the next extra galactic star coming by would be 2 light years away.
i'm an atheist as i do not see any evidence for the existance of a god.
i encourage critical thinking in everyone and am ready to debate anyone on whether or not there is a god and what that god might be like.
hmu..
try to put everything in perspective, think what you can create in your lifetime, in a pile or compilation, then look at the universe. Even if it made itself, it was a great set up, like the making of a new human, that for all purposes makes itself.
just read a post on facebook where somebody is making some wild crazy-talk about the descendants of cain being the beast of revelation or something.. cain was always a strange tale to me.
don't people use any critical thinking skills when they read this stuff?
everybody knows cain killed his brother abel, but do they ever look at the surrounding tale?.
it was never intended to!
and these inconsistencies allow wt to introduce their own, pile their's on top, and pretend it is a sweet smell agreeable to the sniffer. phd pretending.
i'm an atheist as i do not see any evidence for the existance of a god.
i encourage critical thinking in everyone and am ready to debate anyone on whether or not there is a god and what that god might be like.
hmu..
devouring the mass equivalent of the sun every two days
perhaps going back to where it came from, or as some opine, into a different bubble of the multiverse,
none of this is proof that there is a "god" as we know her or not.
just proving that there is work in progress.
i'm an atheist as i do not see any evidence for the existance of a god.
i encourage critical thinking in everyone and am ready to debate anyone on whether or not there is a god and what that god might be like.
hmu..
See 'A Universe From Nothing' by Lawrence Krauss.
read the book more than twice, it is getting long in the tooth by now. and there is no such thing as nothing.
The zero energy slogan is a croc too. just because energies balance out, like in our 4 billion year old orbit, gravity pulling in, orbital velocity pulling out, does not mean there is 0 energy: contrary, there are 2 "energy forces" pulling against each other.
same goes for the eternal energy potential. there are (2) equal parts, 1 on on each side of the balance,
even LK's "nothing" needs time to exist in, energies to balance, and
that ultimate question, never mind the answer, is beyond our comprehension, mine anyway.
i'm an atheist as i do not see any evidence for the existance of a god.
i encourage critical thinking in everyone and am ready to debate anyone on whether or not there is a god and what that god might be like.
hmu..
the word god has an endless number of meanings as we have already seen in this thread. : cofty
defining the g-word would focus the discussion.
I like to zero in on the existence question, the footprints a possible creator left behind. artwork even.
Things that "science" has proven: Energy, even its alter ego, matter, can not be destroyed or created, so it must be eternal. For energy to exist, it must have time to exist in, so "time" is eternal, not just the past, but also into the future.
With that out of the way as over the horizon, beyond our grasp, now what?
