Waton, I'm not sure why you think the controversial Titus-Bode rule somehow proves creation. Also, it also doesn't always hold true like you assert:
cognisonance: thank you for the graph. The rule holds true for Pluto, but not Neptune, (as i mentioned above) however, the outer, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto are equidistant at 9.6 AU spacings, as are the inner ones, Mercury, Venus, Earth at .3 AU showing a kind of a cognisonance, of 1 to 32 ( .3 to 9.6) wavelength, 5 Octaves of doubling, but equal spacings at both ends.
Keplers laws show, that if you have ratios like 1:2 in orbits you have relations in timing, velocities, all synchronized for many millennia.
Curious, that in this scheme of lowest common denominators Earth would show up at 10 (which wt adopted as the symbol of earthly perfection). Of course as you said, many variations in that, Venus retrograde rotation, Uranus's tilt. Pluto intersecting Neptune's orbit..... No planets in the bode-predicted halvings below venus.
Apart from this "10" coincidence, I consider all creation, or nature as proof of creation.
The solar system is stable because of the resonances in the orbits, possibly atuned even to the Eigenschwingungen of the Sun. latest enigma I am working on: 1/100000 herz of middle c in solar vibrations relating to "bode". possibly r of mercury orbit. if seen by "c" .382 AU.!
I do not believe , like Newton that the creator is a tinkerer, it all is made possible by the original setup, supply of Energy, matter, laws.