i bleed for the poor souls caught in that.
no sprinkler system in that domestic building..!.
tragically the govts various of london learned nothing during the world war..
SF:...fire-lighter material protected by aluminium foil.'--" up and onto the exterior cladding, which was unfortunately constructed with a flammable polyethylene inner layer. F:
interesting. hopefully with the source and spread of the fire at the perimeter, many eventually kept their windows closed and escaped to the cool inner core, down the staircase. hopefully none clung to the windows where the heat was, and were somehow warned to seek the central way down.
a couple of months ago this crazy gb member via video gave a talk about their would be princes in the new order but no princesses.
i thought that was so funny.
especially after he beated around the bush the whole talk, finally saying in the last sentence their would be princes but no princesses in the new system,then the video just blacked out.
any aspiring to royalty among the sisters are urged to start partaking at the Memorial now. . Rulers will be in heaven. canneiving jezebels hiding among the OS of the GC after the GT? why not, alive and well now in all congregations!
i bleed for the poor souls caught in that.
no sprinkler system in that domestic building..!.
tragically the govts various of london learned nothing during the world war..
Any person or organisation shown to be responsible should face criminal charges. Luhe:
it might not be criminal, but economics. The cladding had an airspace and toxic plastic to burn, but that airspace is code to prevent mold. but also creating this chimney effect. depleting oxygen in the building, toxic, nasty killing fumes.
Is it better to pave over England to give all the comers a separate ground level unit? where is Prince Phillip when we need him with a bon mot?
so he tries to prove that we are living in the last days without any evidence, but instead a series of unsubstantiated assertions ("never has there been a time with so much lack love and affection").
and uses things that are not even part of the so-called "sign" (abortions, pollution).
then proceeds to ridicule the "ridiculers," stereotype them, and declare they are only fit for destruction!.
He talks about abortion and the lack of natural affection but how many thousands have they talked into not having children, smothering their natural human inclinations?
Listener: good point! that is why his name is appropriate "mal-enfant". = bad [for] children, unless you get a cross for having 8 by Putin. tres mal.
if “tree of good and bad” were literal, it would mean adam and eve would know what is “good and bad” only after eating of that tree.
however, even before eating of it, they would think “it is good for us to eat of this tree” which means they are already endowed knowledge of “good and bad.” that means “tree of good and bad” is symbolic of something.. since religious organizations interpret this differently, each reader has to adopt his own conclusion.
for me it looks like this: one thinks of good and bad in relation to himself—if something is beneficial for him he would say it is good for him, and bad for him if it is not beneficial.
What was said about the *tree* previously, before Mr. snake eye showed up
not to touch it. a sure invitation to do so.
if “tree of good and bad” were literal, it would mean adam and eve would know what is “good and bad” only after eating of that tree.
however, even before eating of it, they would think “it is good for us to eat of this tree” which means they are already endowed knowledge of “good and bad.” that means “tree of good and bad” is symbolic of something.. since religious organizations interpret this differently, each reader has to adopt his own conclusion.
for me it looks like this: one thinks of good and bad in relation to himself—if something is beneficial for him he would say it is good for him, and bad for him if it is not beneficial.
DID NOT ALERT ADAM & EVE TO ITS PRESENCE OR INSTRUCT THEM TO AVOID IT dg:
or instruct Abel & Cain to do any worship, nor inform Abel of the coming danger.
an non-interventionist creator up to that point.
Up to the point of the serpent speaking all was good, why even consider the knowledge of bad?
is good so boring we need the "bad ", to dominate the news even today?
kansas man who robbed a bank last september told police that he was hoping to get caught (he waited for the police) so he would get prison time to escape his wife, was sentenced tuesday 12th to six months of home confinement.
he had no prior criminal history...poor guy....
well there is always olive oil, the polygamist (the Lyle Jeffs topic) got away (from his many wives?) from FBI's home confined that way, just caught ~1 year on the lam, living in his pickup truck.
Home confinement ? unconstitutional, unusual and cruel punishment!
no wonder solomon tried to get disfellowshipped for apostasy to get away from it all.
i bleed for the poor souls caught in that.
no sprinkler system in that domestic building..!.
tragically the govts various of london learned nothing during the world war..
That is a very tragic way have your life disrupted, and have to live in a human warehouse like that to start with. do not copy the wt example (of their funeral talk) to use the event as an anti wt tirade please.
jws and other christians would often point to the handful of the bible verses that seem to be scientifically accurate as evidence of its divine inspiration.
but not surprisingly, they ignore the ones that are scientifically inaccurate, or when they address those verses they put a spin on it like saying the account is not a reflection of what the bible is teaching but what men at the time erroneously believed and which god allowed them to record in the bible.
would you believe a jw actually told me that!
My favorite is Genesis chapter one where god made.... Dk757;
made the Earth in the beginning.rather than after generations of stars that had to die. Made the flat Earth, so Satan could show all the kingdoms from a high mountain on a clear day at the 4 corners.
there are aspects to the resurrection story that seem unnecessary but make perfect sense if you consider them as patches to shore up the lie of jesus' resurrection.. (1) why did there have to be angels present at jesus' resurrection?
there is no other resurrection account in the bible that mentions the involvement of angels.. possible explanation: jesus' disciples really did steal jesus' body from the tomb.
two or three of them ambushed and knocked/drugged unconscious the guards on the scene before stealing the body.
never mind he was not resurrected, there was a poster here that claimed that "jesus" never died at that time, he merely passed out, and left later.
