So, how, konceptual, is it a problem for admitted (by the very fact that they are "repentent" ) child molesters to be excluded from the congregation permanently?
And this doesn't even touch the fact that these admitted, "repentent" child molesters are unreported to the police, and none of those civil protections can be enacted unless the law compels them to.
DFing would be the only protection other congregants could get.
If we were talking about a situation where people are not reported then that is the key issue and it is this that has to stop. In this case I don't care about DFing as it protects nobody in the long run - an allegation has to be investigated by the authorities and appropriate action taken with the individual.
It it were my club then I'd not let a pedo in but the Witnesses (and pretty much any other Christian religion) is very unlikely to ever ever refuse a convicted pedo from ever a being a member. It's not consistent with a teaching of forgivness, redemption etc.
Now we all know that pedos are not the same as someone who as committed some kind of misdemeanour but even if a person was DF'ed then, assuming they have done the time and are being monitored by the state, then why would they never be allowed to be reinstated?
Even if they were DFed for ever more there are still cases where the org may no be able to DF for whatever the reason is, maybe even where the state cannot substantiate an allegation and convict yet there is still reason to be concerned. People may come into contact with the congregation through a number of circumstances that cannot be managed simply by refusing people entry.
This is why a single, clear, publicly available document that identifies all these risks and details appropriate measures to handle them is critical. It's why they need to look beyond the confines of the congregation and understand that their actions (or inaction) have an impact on the community as a whole and they need to engage with the organisations best placed to keep the public as a whole safe from an individual.
This is where the Australia document really falls down.