And regardless of the validity of the case all cases must be defended and that costs a lot of money and when the cost of the defense exceeds the damages sought it is cheaper to settle. Defense costs money win or loose.
This is true however given the increasing number of people looking to claim against the WT then if they could set some precedents that limit their liability then it would be cheaper in the long run and deter people from making spurious claims.
The WTS tried tirelessly to avoid any liabilities in the Candice Conti case. There was no quick settlement there as they thought they'd bully the victim, out finance her and dishearten everyone else thinking of doing the same.
They lost the Candic Conti case. They are facing increasing secular scrutiny of historic and current abuse policies. The internet is allowing more and more people to see more and more cases of abuse by Witnesses in the public domain. Regardless of the organisational culpability this problem is not going to go away and the WTS is now caught in a dilemma of how to deal with this.
That is all they want money and that is all they settle for, they don't care about child abuse confidentiality and the wt but only as it applies to their case in dollars.
I guess at a base level this is true however it could be implied that any claim is essentially vindictive money grabbing by a victim. I think you would have to have been a victim to really understand the cathartic benefit of being able to have your day in court and see some kind of justice done.