I have explained my conclusions in my OP.
No you didn't. You stated your conclusion.
The best explanation we have for how you arrived at that conclusion is "because the hypothesis is not disproved by the facts" and it's taken 6 pages to get there.
konceptual99
JoinedPosts by konceptual99
-
532
I conclude evolution is guided
by KateWild inyour qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
-
-
konceptual99
-
532
I conclude evolution is guided
by KateWild inyour qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
-
-
konceptual99
I did not state this anywhere on this thread. If you think I did please show me.
It's in your OP Kate.
I draw the conclusion that a Creator could be responsible for guiding the process, others may feel this is evidence of evolution without external guidance.
The fact that I keep asking for more information is proof I am very interested in understanding your perspective. - K99
It can also be proof that you're trying to prove me wrong, and I don't play those games.
It's not a game. I'm not trying to prove anything. I am simply asking for your views and your reasoning process.
An avowed atheist might say "I have drawn the conclusion that natural selection is a valid and reasonable explanation for all the molecules being left handed because the hypothesis is not disproved by the facts and follows the pattern of scientific explanation for many, many other and similar bio-chemical processes." - K99
Is this what you're saying K99?
I have drawn the conclusion that evolution is guided and is a valid and reasonable explanation for all the molecules being left handed because the hypothesis is not disproved by the facts.No, it's not what I am saying. I was using an example of what how someone else might explain their reasoning to contrast with what you had done (or not done) so far in the thread.
Thank you for now qualifying your conclusion. Given that there are at least two potential conclusions to the L/H molecule (NS and deity guided), why come to any conclusion at all? Could you decide just to say "I don't know, it could be either, so I will wait for further evidence one way or the other"? Why choose one over the other?
I still don't understand how you made yours up and I really, really, really am really, really, really interested to do so. - K99
There are things I don't understand too, it's all a matter of getting yourself better educated in the topic if it's so important to you, but I don't believe you're interested at all.
Why do you keep telling yourself I'm not interested?
-
43
Chelmsford is green-lighted
by Saltheart Foamfollower inlooks like chelmsford is going ahead after all.
here is the text of a letter to be read out this week:.
to all congregations in britain and irelandre: branch relocation project updatedear brothers:we rejoice to inform you that in june of this year, the governing body gave approval for thebritain branch to relocate to new facilities that will be constructed just south of chelmsford.
-
-
konceptual99
We'll see bohm, it will all come out in the wash in the end. There will be loads they can remove. One very interesting point is that this confirms the removal of Britain as a printing branch. There is just a warehouse now. No printing. They might also have kept the football field in the bottom corner.
-
43
Chelmsford is green-lighted
by Saltheart Foamfollower inlooks like chelmsford is going ahead after all.
here is the text of a letter to be read out this week:.
to all congregations in britain and irelandre: branch relocation project updatedear brothers:we rejoice to inform you that in june of this year, the governing body gave approval for thebritain branch to relocate to new facilities that will be constructed just south of chelmsford.
-
-
-
43
Chelmsford is green-lighted
by Saltheart Foamfollower inlooks like chelmsford is going ahead after all.
here is the text of a letter to be read out this week:.
to all congregations in britain and irelandre: branch relocation project updatedear brothers:we rejoice to inform you that in june of this year, the governing body gave approval for thebritain branch to relocate to new facilities that will be constructed just south of chelmsford.
-
-
konceptual99
The far right residential buildings essentially remain but are cut to three rows and not four. Look at the pond for reference. The two big sets of blocks to the left go.
Also going:
- printery (now a much smaller warehouse)
- maintenance building
- offices below printery
- indoor recreation
- sports pavilion
- laundry
- office development smaller
- residential services (now offices)
- infirmary (maybe smaller allowance elsewhere)
It looks like the auditorium is remaining.
Accommodation looks roughly 1/4 of the original size (around 1200 residents and guests)
-
43
Chelmsford is green-lighted
by Saltheart Foamfollower inlooks like chelmsford is going ahead after all.
here is the text of a letter to be read out this week:.
to all congregations in britain and irelandre: branch relocation project updatedear brothers:we rejoice to inform you that in june of this year, the governing body gave approval for thebritain branch to relocate to new facilities that will be constructed just south of chelmsford.
-
-
konceptual99
New site...
-
43
Chelmsford is green-lighted
by Saltheart Foamfollower inlooks like chelmsford is going ahead after all.
here is the text of a letter to be read out this week:.
to all congregations in britain and irelandre: branch relocation project updatedear brothers:we rejoice to inform you that in june of this year, the governing body gave approval for thebritain branch to relocate to new facilities that will be constructed just south of chelmsford.
-
-
konceptual99
Just trying to upload some comparison images... taking ages....
-
532
I conclude evolution is guided
by KateWild inyour qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
-
-
konceptual99
Looks like we are going round in circles. It seems you are not really interested in understanding my perspective. I started this thread to explain my conclusions and I have done that.
Er... no you haven't. I am very interested in your perspective but you keep stonewalling any questions that seek to understand why you have come to your conclusion. You used a very specific example yet all you have explained is that you think the process could be being guided by God. You haven't answered why you think that conclusion is more probable and what your reasoning was that led you to that conclusion. The fact that I keep asking for more information is proof I am very interested in understanding your perspective.
As I have already said to Bhom, in my view it's more probable.
Why is is it more probable?I don't want to convince people that my view is correct. I want to encourage free thinking. Science has the facts and science is impartial. People then are free draw their own conclusions.
Whatever you say I am still free to draw my own conclusion.
An avowed atheist might say "I have drawn the conclusion that natural selection is a valid and reasonable explanation for all the molecules being left handed because the hypothesis is not disproven by the facts and follows the pattern of scientific explanation for many, many other and similar bio-chemical processes."
You are currently saying ""I have drawn the conclusion that guidance from a deity is a valid and reasonable explanation for all the molecules being left handed" and there it seems to stop. There is no "because" and when asked for your reason you claim the your statement is reason enough, just go off and make your own mind up.
I can still make my mind up. I still don't understand how you made yours up and I really, really, really am really, really, really interested to do so. -
43
Kids continue to leave in droves - so what is the organization's grand plan? This
by sir82 injws have one of the worst, if not the worst, retention rates among their kids.
i've seen numbers from 65% to 88% who leave, never to return.. you'd think this would be a priority amongst the leadership, right?
where do tomorrow's leaders come from, if the vast majority of kids leave the organization?
-
-
konceptual99
Use emotional videos at RCs to reinforce fear, obligation and guilt.
-
532
I conclude evolution is guided
by KateWild inyour qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
-
-
konceptual99
Just to add, right now the argument seems circular....
1. Kate - The auto catalystic nature of L/H molecule creation leads me to conclude it is being guided by God.
2. Others - why?
3. Kate - see 1.
I have an open mind Kate and am happy to be convinced. The question is what can you add to your argument that convinces? I don't have to think differently to you, I could be persuaded to think the same as you but what is the reason that I should? Why should I not accept that the L/H molecule thing is a product of natural selection? What are the weaknesses in that conclusion?
