It's coming out through implication in videos directed at kids as well as accounts of young ones being baptised at 10,11,12 during speeches by GB and senior WTS elders at branch visits and conventions. The last example of this is Mark Sanderson talking about a 9 year old being baptised during the branch visit in Germany.
konceptual99
JoinedPosts by konceptual99
-
10
J.W. Parents Being Conned to Sacrifice Their Kids to the Org!
by The Searcher inis now really putting the pressure on j.w.
's to "encourage" their pre-pubescent children to "dedicate" themselves to the org by being baptized!.
not only does the bible dismiss such a false directive, the org's own insight book dismisses the suggestion that such young ones are mentally able to make such a decision!
-
-
-
88
Damned if they do, Damned if they don't
by FusionTheism ini see an attitude among some people here which is not very helpful.
i can understand it, but still, it's not constructive or helpful.. if you condemn the society for not changing, but then you also condemn them when they do change in a positive way, what incentive or motive does that provide for the people at the society to ever want to change for the better?.
also, what does that attitude look like to current witnesses who are having doubts?.
-
-
konceptual99
Oh and PLEASE read Terry's latest thread. It's brilliant.
-
88
Damned if they do, Damned if they don't
by FusionTheism ini see an attitude among some people here which is not very helpful.
i can understand it, but still, it's not constructive or helpful.. if you condemn the society for not changing, but then you also condemn them when they do change in a positive way, what incentive or motive does that provide for the people at the society to ever want to change for the better?.
also, what does that attitude look like to current witnesses who are having doubts?.
-
-
konceptual99
Fusion - I have some sympathy for the thought behind your post. Whatever the faults of the WTS there is little to be gained from throwing logical fallacies back at someone trying to argue for the WTS.
Having said that, a objective analysis of what exactly the WTS changes and how they change it shows time after time after time that they apologise for very little, make zero mention of how 180 degree turns in doctrine makes a mockery of their assertion that they have the "truth" and expect the flock to simply follow without comment.
On top of this, they refuse to address glaring holes in eschatology such as the 607 date, the generation teaching, glaring inconsistencies in the blood doctrine and child protection issues. Not only is dissent managed by demonising and excluding perpetrators but even honest hearted questioning and discussion is prevented through thinly veiled social manipulation.
The fact is that there is always a hidden agenda to any action the WTS undertakes. They don't wake up one day and go "oh we were morons about this" and change it, every action is carefully planned and thought out. They lay the groundwork for changes months, even years in advance. Even the GB approval process requires ALL to be in agreement.
If you think the change to the types/anti-types understanding is simply them thinking they went to far in the past then think again. They are making things less specific because firstly it means they can be held less accountable when things don't add up and also, I believe, to make future arguments that other scriptures are to be taken less literally more palatable. I think they have a long term plan to reduce the specific nature of certain prophesies such as the generation teaching and the only way of doing this is getting rid of loads of cases where the hubris of Freddy F and his minions got the better of them.
So, when you are faced with a torrent of "apostates" biting back at you over things like your OP then just bear in mind many on this board have seen the two faced and self-serving nature of the GB and WTS at first hand over and over again. The WTS is far less genuine and honest heartedly misguided than you would like to think.
-
26
Is it possible that you were raised in a false religion?
by snare&racket indo you believe in islam?
there are 1.6 billion muslims.
do you accept the pope as gods representative on earth?
-
-
konceptual99
There really is no need to insert jpgs when there is a perfectly good text editor on the page.
Anyway, the point of the OP is not about the legal and secular framework related to a religious belief. It's all about the likelihood that 8 million people are following the only "TRUTH" when billions of others are considered by those same people to be wrong.
Add to this the fact the the "TRUTH" changes and what had to be accepted as 100% true last week now is wrong and replaced by the opposite view, which is now the 100% truth.
-
23
Why BOGUS PREDICTIONS and CHANGEABLE TEACHINGS only strengthen JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES
by TerryWalstrom intoday's jw knows less about the history of the watchtower religion than ever before.. there is no need to know.
only the present moment of new light has meaning.. there are too many enemies surrounding jw's to risk learning something faith-weakening.. such as facts.
the watchtower religion (jehovah's witnesses) has been 'getting away with it' since 1874.. setting dates built on false chronology, pyramidology, slanted quotations about world events, and misrepresenting their own authority, (channel of jehovah) is a profitable enterprise for the watchtower org.. how do we know they 'get away with it'?.
-
-
konceptual99
Quality post once again. Thank you Terry. -
55
JWs and their views on Sex
by campaign of hate inin the past i have read on this forum that the wt have a say in the "bedroom" of couples.
i thought that was a bit overkill at first, but recently i have come to conclusion that this is true.. the control administered by the wt cooperation on ones sex life is not on only intrusive, its damaging.
they control every aspect of ones thought and action, thus leading most down a path that said corporation wants them to tread.. this path is to get married young, and then eternal loyalty the the organisation.. so how can an organisation force you to get married young?.
-
-
konceptual99
Hi Brock,
Just to apologise if I came across as generally dismissive regarding the impact of WT teachings on sex, that was not my intent.
I am well aware that during the late 60 and 70s particularly there was much more direct "counsel" published, as per your citations. I know from my childhood that the interference and intervention into the private lives of married couples was far more intrusive and clearly affected many.
It is also true to say that the WTS has not completely retracted or changed teachings on many things published in those days so they still stand. For example, as far as I know, despite some words around the elders not being bedroom police, they have not retracted their view that oral sex is not appropriate as it's a practice common to homosexuals.
I am in my 40s and had conversations with peers about oral sex in the 90s. The overriding opinion was that the WTS literature did essentially ban it but if you did it consensually then who was going to know or really care.
I am sure that the behaviour of young ones in the late 80s and 90s dating was not that far off what was going on in earlier decades with people getting into "heavy petting" etc. without too much conscience. I know ones that would sleep with their BF/GF.
As I qualified, my experience of married ones over the past 20 years is that no one discusses WTS policies when it comes to what goes on in the bedroom and does what they want pretty much. I am not dismissing the problems that still may occur in a marriage and I am sure there are some who are affected by feelings of guilt over what is completely normal behaviour. I am convinced however, that the vast majority of problems in marriages I have seen over the time myself and my peers have been married are predominately down to the wider circumstances around simply being hitched to the wrong person. If the sex is bad then this will be part of the cycle that contributes to the deterioration of the relationship.
I count myself fortunate to have been getting married at a time when the impact of the WTS policing the sexual conduct of couples was declining. I can see from your posts and others, such as Flipper, how much the WTS affected the day to day lives of couples just a few years earlier and how much their ridiculous assertions would affect the mental state of single persons and couples engaging in completely normal, natural behaviour.
-
7
Simplified Suggestion--The 144,000
by FusionTheism inthe governing body has recently placed a large priority on simplicity and clarity in their teachings and publications.
for example:the watchtower study edition, march 15, 2015, pages 8-10:.
in recent years, the spiritual instruction provided by jehovahs organization has reflected an increased emphasis on simplicity and clarity.
-
-
konceptual99
I'll be giving suggestions to the Governing Body for much simpler, accurate, interpretations based on the context
Do you have a plan on presenting this info to them and getting their feedback?
-
63
2015 Convention Releases
by wifibandit inhttp://www.jw.org/en/publications/jw-convention-releases-2015/.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gc7cyswlvwg.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfmuamqiv4k.
-
-
konceptual99
One of my biggest regrets about my teenage years was not playing with girls in school.
George
Love it fella....
-
55
JWs and their views on Sex
by campaign of hate inin the past i have read on this forum that the wt have a say in the "bedroom" of couples.
i thought that was a bit overkill at first, but recently i have come to conclusion that this is true.. the control administered by the wt cooperation on ones sex life is not on only intrusive, its damaging.
they control every aspect of ones thought and action, thus leading most down a path that said corporation wants them to tread.. this path is to get married young, and then eternal loyalty the the organisation.. so how can an organisation force you to get married young?.
-
-
konceptual99
Hi Faye,
You are absolutely right. People do suffer sexual incompatibility and I was not suggesting that the WTS is right to ban sexual contact outside of the marriage arrangement. I actually think the WTS has been clearer in recent years about the need to discuss all aspects of a relationship, including sex. I also think that far more couples go further than the WTS would like to think before they get married. In fact, it seems that some couples ignore many of the Bible's restrictions and also ignore much of the pretty sensible advice about how to get to know someone and be sure you want a relationship. Hence the problem - there are plenty of couples in every congregation who had done lots of things sexually before they got married but are now locked into very difficult relationships because they fell in love (or just lust) with a poor life partner.
-
74
Is Prophecy important?
by EA916 inhello, i am certainly new to all of this.
i have recently been studying the prophecy's, and i was wondering if they are of any importance at all?
-
-
konceptual99
EA916/FusionTheism,
You can go round in circles trying prove the ancient texts are true as basically if you have eyes of "faith" then you can accept anything that is written. What was far more relevant to me when evaluating similar questions I had was what the F&DS had prophesied.
Take a look at ANYTHING the WTS has claimed will happen and see if you can find ONE example where it came to pass as they suggested. Don't be fooled by the WTS revisionist history on things like 1914. What did they say BEFORE the event and what actually happened?
I cannot find one thing in the past 140+ years of WTS history that is shows any kind of prophetic insight. Instead, all I find is revision, conjecture, speculation and spin.
If that is the case then you have to ask yourself why the Bible should be any different.