Posts by konceptual99

7

Simplified Suggestion--The 144,000

by FusionTheism in

the governing body has recently placed a large priority on simplicity and clarity in their teachings and publications.

for example:the watchtower study edition, march 15, 2015, pages 8-10:.

in recent years, the spiritual instruction provided by jehovahs organization has reflected an increased emphasis on simplicity and clarity.

konceptual99

I'll be giving suggestions to the Governing Body for much simpler, accurate, interpretations based on the context

Do you have a plan on presenting this info to them and getting their feedback?

63

2015 Convention Releases

by wifibandit in

http://www.jw.org/en/publications/jw-convention-releases-2015/.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gc7cyswlvwg.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfmuamqiv4k.

konceptual99

One of my biggest regrets about my teenage years was not playing with girls in school.

George

Love it fella....

55

JWs and their views on Sex

by campaign of hate in

in the past i have read on this forum that the wt have a say in the "bedroom" of couples.

i thought that was a bit overkill at first, but recently i have come to conclusion that this is true.. the control administered by the wt cooperation on ones sex life is not on only intrusive, its damaging.

they control every aspect of ones thought and action, thus leading most down a path that said corporation wants them to tread.. this path is to get married young, and then eternal loyalty the the organisation.. so how can an organisation force you to get married young?.

konceptual99

Hi Faye,

You are absolutely right. People do suffer sexual incompatibility and I was not suggesting that the WTS is right to ban sexual contact outside of the marriage arrangement. I actually think the WTS has been clearer in recent years about the need to discuss all aspects of a relationship, including sex. I also think that far more couples go further than the WTS would like to think before they get married. In fact, it seems that some couples ignore many of the Bible's restrictions and also ignore much of the pretty sensible advice about how to get to know someone and be sure you want a relationship. Hence the problem - there are plenty of couples in every congregation who had done lots of things sexually before they got married but are now locked into very difficult relationships because they fell in love (or just lust) with a poor life partner.

74

Is Prophecy important?

by EA916 in

hello, i am certainly new to all of this.

i have recently been studying the prophecy's, and i was wondering if they are of any importance at all?

konceptual99

EA916/FusionTheism,

You can go round in circles trying prove the ancient texts are true as basically if you have eyes of "faith" then you can accept anything that is written. What was far more relevant to me when evaluating similar questions I had was what the F&DS had prophesied.

Take a look at ANYTHING the WTS has claimed will happen and see if you can find ONE example where it came to pass as they suggested. Don't be fooled by the WTS revisionist history on things like 1914. What did they say BEFORE the event and what actually happened?

I cannot find one thing in the past 140+ years of WTS history that is shows any kind of prophetic insight. Instead, all I find is revision, conjecture, speculation and spin.

If that is the case then you have to ask yourself why the Bible should be any different.

63

2015 Convention Releases

by wifibandit in

http://www.jw.org/en/publications/jw-convention-releases-2015/.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gc7cyswlvwg.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfmuamqiv4k.

konceptual99

Nice to see they kept the Eddie Murphy picture as well. p 316

26

Witnesses called for a bible study

by umbertoecho in

hello all.. i haven't been here for some time to post as mainly i read the comments and such.

yesterday was a really interesting, unnerving experience though.

two sisters had called last week when i had an abscess on my tooth and was sort of sick from it.

konceptual99

They will come in. Faf around for a while. Then go. Never to return as they will have discerned that you clearly do not have the right heart condition.

7

New way of preacing?

by dogon in

i have noticed that in florida at least i see at every flea market and or town square jws sitting drinking coffee with a table and a couple of sandwich signs with watchtowers and awakes doing nothing more than playing on their phones and or talking to each other.

i have not yet seen anyone going up to them and engaging them but i bet they are counting time.

what a cheat.

konceptual99

Yup - it's easy ministry and a great way to build up LOADS of hours for that all important headline of total hours preached.

63

2015 Convention Releases

by wifibandit in

http://www.jw.org/en/publications/jw-convention-releases-2015/.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gc7cyswlvwg.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfmuamqiv4k.

konceptual99

I am not one to call conspiracy on every little detail and maybe I am reading too much into this but note the way the reference is worded:

A careful study of Bible prophecy reveals that “the Lord’s day” began in modern times. In 1914, what became known as World War I broke out. And the decades since then have been marked by more wars, plagues, starvation, earthquakes, and other evidences marking a large-scale fulfillment of “the sign” that Jesus gave his apostles about his “presence” and “the end.” (Matthew 24:3, 7, 8, 14) The preaching of the good news of the Kingdom is now being done, not just in the area of the Roman Empire, but globally.

It says the Lord's day began "in modern times". 1914 is not referenced directly as the start of this nor is the establishment of the Kingdom linked directly to 1914 in a way that it would have been in the past. 1914 is simply referenced as the start of WW1

Now this maybe very subtle but could this be a move to disentangle 1914/WW1 from the establishment of the Kingdom?

On the other hand, pages 258/259 discuss Matt 24 and the generation is still linked to the last days. One part of this says:

Jesus is once again showing that what he is foretelling is not of limited scope. He is not prophesying about events that would occur in a few decades and that would affect only the city of Jerusalem or the Jewish nation. No, he is pointing to developments that “will come upon all those dwelling on the face of the whole earth.”

When you read the whole chapter the generation teaching is still very much related to events of the last days....

55

JWs and their views on Sex

by campaign of hate in

in the past i have read on this forum that the wt have a say in the "bedroom" of couples.

i thought that was a bit overkill at first, but recently i have come to conclusion that this is true.. the control administered by the wt cooperation on ones sex life is not on only intrusive, its damaging.

they control every aspect of ones thought and action, thus leading most down a path that said corporation wants them to tread.. this path is to get married young, and then eternal loyalty the the organisation.. so how can an organisation force you to get married young?.

konceptual99

I think the impact of JW supposed rules on sex in most marriages over the past 20+ years has been minimal. I know no one who really thinks oral sex is banned. I know no one who really thinks that there is only one position or is not adventurous in some way. We knew an ex bethelite couple who had a wardrobe full of sexy role play dressing up clothes.

My wife and I have been faithfully married for a long time over 2 decades now. We both followed WT doctrine as far as sex before marriage was concerned. I can honestly say that the elders or the Watchtower have never had an say in how we behave. We enjoy a really good time and that's because we love each other and have worked hard to have a successful marriage. At the risk of being shot down I do think some of this is due to principles and practical guidance that we have both tried to apply as Witnesses. I am not saying you a happy marriage is only possible by being a Witness, just that even in my mentally out state I do think there was perhaps something positive from my time in.

No doubt some do have sexual hang ups or do not enjoy a healthy sex life. In my experience this is not thanks to WT doctrine on sex in itself but down to problems people either have with themselves or with each other far beyond what goes on in the bedroom. There is no doubt that there are a significant number of Witnesses who remain in unhappy marriages. I doubt very much however that this is because of some hang up what goes on in the bedroom. I think it is because they got married too young, too quick to the wrong person. Their goals diverged. The outlook diverged. There aspirations and hopes were not met. Keeping their life "simple" brought money worries and dissatisfaction as they could not do the things others were doing. The marriage was too hierarchical with a bright wife forced to be in subjection to a dim husband. They lost respect for themselves and each other.

Problems in the bedroom are generally the symptom of bigger problems elsewhere, not the cause. I am 100% sure that many of the Witnesses in happy and successful marriages are enjoying lots of things in the bedroom that would have given Freddy boy a coronary.

63

2015 Convention Releases

by wifibandit in

http://www.jw.org/en/publications/jw-convention-releases-2015/.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gc7cyswlvwg.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfmuamqiv4k.

konceptual99

The Sophia video is sickening. For a org that claims never to solicit to have something, which 100% will be shown at the assembly to thousands, that directly manipulates young minds so much is outrageous.

True, there have always been examples of young children getting involved in activities like preaching and donating but the exposure to this has always been far more controllable by the parents. The Bible Story book never had anything remotely as blatant in it. These videos are the new JW babysitters and the kids watch them over and over again.

[EDIT] - The fact it's an slightly older young one (i.e. not a child of 5 or 6) is meaningless - the audience starts at infant level.

It's wrong. Plain and simple.