You are now going around in circles like a broken record just throwing out random statements that have no bearing on the arguments of this case. First you argue on the small number of victims RV recruited, then you argue that RV should send these victims to authorities, and now your latest argument is that RV is "only voicing their opinion".
So
what? In this case, their "opinion" carries the weight of actual
victims that can testify, these are not just "people" as you refer to.
Their "opinion" carries arguments against WT policies that have been
shown to be sound and true from historical accounts in their home
country and elsewhere.
You can call RV's claims an opinion, but it adds nothing to your arguments in favor of WT. Again, you have nothing.