A shortcoming common to both scientists and theologians, in my opinion, is that they each present their perceptions as dogma and endeavor to set sacred boundaries for truth, based on that dogma, based on those perceptions. In doing so, they become polarized in their different fields of thought, fenced in by their own precepts and the categorical exclusion of any concept originating in the enemy camp. If there's one thing the human race should have learned by now, it's the fact that we've got a hell of a lot to learn and it's not wise to be too cocky about the little cache of knowledge we've managed to accumulate thus far. An open mind to an opposing point of view can sometimes prove to be the doorway to great insight.
But, that's just me!