Yesterday we were blasted by particles from the sun. Worst sun eruption since 2003. We were unharmed. Does that mean that the event never occurred? All the scientists are wrong. No, we were protected by various natural mechanisms. Hopefully you can follow my reasoning. I usually allow for benefit of the doubt, until a matter is proved wrong.
Posts by Vidqun
-
285Evolution disproved by 11 year old niece
by StopTheTears inmary: what's evolution?.
me: well it's kinda complicated.
they think plasma gave birth to monkeys which gave birth to humans.
-
-
-
285
Evolution disproved by 11 year old niece
by StopTheTears inmary: what's evolution?.
me: well it's kinda complicated.
they think plasma gave birth to monkeys which gave birth to humans.
-
-
Vidqun
You're right, it doesn't prove anything, just like your post. Doesn't say anything either.
-
285
Evolution disproved by 11 year old niece
by StopTheTears inmary: what's evolution?.
me: well it's kinda complicated.
they think plasma gave birth to monkeys which gave birth to humans.
-
-
Vidqun
Lime, he did more than start a fire. He melted the rocks (cf. 1 Kings 18:38). No mean feat. How factual is it. Here's a scan and quote I found from a previous thread.
Atomic Energy on Mount Carmel
Professor A. Freeman, LL.D., Litt.D., in a letter to the editor of The Flame, said :
"Your mention of Mount Carmel in The Flame (May-June issue) reminds me of some facts revealed in the Bible Exhibition at Pembridge Road Hall, Notting Hill Gate, London W. 11, where there are thousands of Biblical exhibits. Two of these, to my mind, prove once more how historically and scientifically correct is the Bible. From New Mexico, in U. S. A., comes a blue transparent crystal. Here the first test bomb (atomic) was exploded, and all over the area were these crystals. I have a crystal found by the archaeologists which looked exactly like the one from New Mexico (and also those found after Hiroshima). I had the two crystals examined by a noted analyst in London, and he declared they were exactly the same. This stone bearing the crystal came from Mount Carmel, and was over 3,000 years old! The crystals were embedded upon it. In 1 Kings, chapter 18, we read that fire came down from heaven and destroyed the offering and the large altar stones. The stone in my possession was one of the fragments of the altar stones! The same forces at work—made by God in the beginning and just discovered by man. How true is the Bible!"
DECEMBER 22, 1948
The "crystals" are called tektites. Naturally occuring tekties are thought to be either lunar in origin, or products of large meteor impacts. They are also found at sites of nuclear explosions, although the article I'll link doesn't mention that. It is possible that the scientific community is using a different name for the examples of nuclear origin since I can't seem to find any references to nuclear explosions in any of the articles I've checked (see below about the ones found at the site of the first nulcear explosion, the trinitites). They are not "crystals", rather, they are glass made up of material fused under high temperatures. I would assume that the tekties associated with nuclear explosions would also contain unused urainium or plutonium, since not all of the fissionable material is used up in the explosion.
Flat_accent, can't get to your videos. Can you repost path.
-
285
Evolution disproved by 11 year old niece
by StopTheTears inmary: what's evolution?.
me: well it's kinda complicated.
they think plasma gave birth to monkeys which gave birth to humans.
-
-
Vidqun
Sorry for working backwards. Stealth, I looked at your article. It starts off:
Scientists said on Tuesday that they had discovered the world's first hybrid sharks in Australian waters , a potential sign the predators were adapting to cope with climate change .
"It's very surprising because no one's ever seen shark hybrids before, this is not a common occurrence by any stretch of the imagination," Morgan, from the University of Queensland , told AFP.
"This is evolution in action."
The author and your gut feeling say evolution, my gut feeling says adaptation.
-
285
Evolution disproved by 11 year old niece
by StopTheTears inmary: what's evolution?.
me: well it's kinda complicated.
they think plasma gave birth to monkeys which gave birth to humans.
-
-
Vidqun
I told myself I will not get involved with such a thread again, but what the hell....
Cofty, I saw the documentary of the wolves. Your "gut feeling" says evolution. My "gut feeling" says: Adaptation - a change, as of an organism's structure, to conform to environment. [Gut feeling, i.e., in my view "leap of faith": See article in thread and previous posts] Nothing I have read or seen since have convinced me otherwise.
Poopsiecakes: Vestigiality? Are you referring to the human appendix, the coccyx (a small tail?), and the sixth toe of an elephant. The appendix in a horse's stomach assists in digestion. Without it the horse cannot survive. The appendix in a human is closely linked to the immune system. Human can live without it, but it has a function. Any newer examples perhaps? This does not prove anything.
-
-
-
Vidqun
Who is in the Writing Department? Only God knows.
-
7
An Article From The Canadian Medical Association
by Bangalore inan article from the canadian medical association.. .
.
bangalore.
-
-
Vidqun
I'm not keen on blood tranfusions because of medical reasons. This is a more recent article. It does not inspire confidence in the US blood supply.
American Red Cross fined for failure in blood safety
The American Red Cross was fined by the FDA for poor blood safety practices.
Lillian Rizzo January 17, 2012 14:12
The American Red Cross has been fined for poor and unsafe blood management practices, failing to correct violations of blood-safety rules, MSNBC reported.
The Food and Drug Administration slapped a $9.59 million fine on the the American Red Cross after inspections at 16 blood centers between April and October 2010 showed ongoing problems that could endanger donors and potentially allow contaminated blood to get into the country’s supply, MSNBC reported.
The American Red Cross has been cited 14 times since 2003 and fined close to $46 million for similar reasons, Bloomberg reported. The organization also didn’t ensure that its entire staff has been adequately trained in blood safety. It also hasn’t created a complete list of prospective donors who were disqualified from giving blood, according to a letter the FDA made public on January 13.
Read more at GlobalPost: Opinion: Let's make clean blood a priority
“FDA cannot definitively say there was never any danger to the blood supply since the violations can create conditions that could lead to potential safety consequences,” said Patricia El-Hinnawy, FDA spokeswoman, MSNBC reported.
The American Red Cross supplies 40 percent of the nation’s blood. The letter also doesn’t rule out at the potentially infected blood has already been transfused, USA Today reported.
But the FDA has yet to find any evidence that points to any serious health consequences for blood recipients, Bloomberg reported.
“The safety of the nation’s blood supply is one of our top priorities, and we have no reason to believe that it has been compromised,” said Mary Malarkey, head of compliance at the agency’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Bloomberg reported. “It’s very important to note that people who need transfusions should continue to take their doctors’ advice, and we encourage people to donate blood.”
A Red Cross spokeswoman has also said in a statement that the problems the FDA points out in its 32-page letter are centered on an inspection at a Philadelphia blood center conducted 15 months ago, MSNBC reported.
“We are disappointed that the FDA believed it necessary to impose a fine for an inspection conducted so long ago,” wrote Stephanie Millian, director of biomedical communications, MSNBC reported. “We are not aware of any adverse donor reactions or patient issues due to the problems in the FDA report.”
However, a fine in June 2010 was for similar failures in the organization.
-
63
Circuit Assembly Confronting Apostate Challenge
by watson inwell, i sat thru day 2 of the latest circuit assembly.
instead of having the co or do re address the "generation" confusion, they had a couple of brothers do a demonstration.
mocha break out in service, weaker brother mentions he's tired....all of the changes lately, the confusing new understanding of that generation, et al.
-
-
Vidqun
Thanks Ray, a travesty of justice every time. How do they help the victims? Do they refer them to child psychologists, psychiatrists? No, they probably have a Bible study with them. That is why they feel they are above the law in Vicroria, Australia, by not registering. They know better.
-
-
-
Vidqun
I posted this in another thread, but it should rather be under this thread. I have been wondering: Is it possible for a (pedophile) sexual predator to be repentant? Sorry I did it. I will never do it again. Isn't that the reason why they are put in prison, to take them out of circulation, to protect the population at large, especially the children? Usually in a Court of Law, judges, lawyers, criminologists, psychologists, pediatricians, etc., give their input. When the judicial committee of JWs sits, three amateur novices decide. No wonder the victims suffer. Suffer the little children.
-
63
Circuit Assembly Confronting Apostate Challenge
by watson inwell, i sat thru day 2 of the latest circuit assembly.
instead of having the co or do re address the "generation" confusion, they had a couple of brothers do a demonstration.
mocha break out in service, weaker brother mentions he's tired....all of the changes lately, the confusing new understanding of that generation, et al.
-
-
Vidqun
Just one question: Is it possible for a (pedophile) sexual predator to be repentant? Sorry I did it. I will never do it again. Isn't that the reason why they are put in prison, to take them out of circulation, to protect the population at large, especially the children.