This idea will not work. When a person turns in a report the hours and mags posted on their publisher record card and on a master sheet that tabulates the report. Any unusual deviations from normal activity would be spotted and questioned at the local level and immediately called into question.
@DT - When a person does not report time for month they are not counted as active publisher that month and total publisher reporting count goes down by one. If they hand in a late report the next month along with the current report for that month the publisher count goes up by two. Anyone turning two reports for the same month would be flagged. Pumping up the numbers would be really hard.
The peak publisher number in August is really a bogus number because it reflects all of the current months reports plus any months that were missed. Each report is counted as a publisher. There is no other way for them to do it. The official publisher count for a congregation is taken twice a year when the CO visits. Since every congregation has the CO visit at diffrent times it is not possible for these reports, which are the most accurate because they count publisher record cards, not field service reports to produce the peak number.
The real number is the average number of publishers because it eliminates the lows from months when the reporting is poor and the highs from months when the elder push to get missing reports and the count is high.
A+ for creativiy though!