scholar: "Hellenism was a major cultural influence on Jewish Society at the time of Jesus but it is somewhat of a stretch to classify Jesus as 'Hellenized Jew' for there is simply no evidence for such a label."
I understand your reasoning, but if Jewish Society (in general) was 'hellenised,' then most Jews were hellenised culturally. For another example of this process we could cross to what is now Afghanistan and find examples of Buddhism being Hellenised. The people who produced the sculptures etc that are still extant were themselves deeply affected by Greek culture.
And an example of the process can be found in 1 Maccabees 1:13-1513
"some from among the people promptly went to the king, and he authorized them to introduce the ordinances of the Gentiles.
Thereupon they built a gymnasium* in Jerusalem according to the Gentile custom.15
They disguised their circumcision and abandoned the holy covenant; they allied themselves with the Gentiles and sold themselves to wrongdoing."
and in 2 Maccabees 4: 12-1612
" With perverse delight he established a gymnasium* at the very foot of the citadel, where he induced the noblest young men to wear the Greek hat.13
The craze for Hellenism and the adoption of foreign customs reached such a pitch, through the outrageous wickedness of Jason, the renegade and would-be high priest,14that the priests no longer cared about the service of the altar. Disdaining the temple and neglecting the sacrifices, they hastened, at the signal for the games, to take part in the unlawful exercises at the arena.15
What their ancestors had regarded as honors they despised; what the Greeks esteemed as glory they prized highly."
Even the priests wanted to spend time in the Greek gymnasium, wrestling naked with other young men (which is why they attempted to stretch their foreskins because in the Greek culture of that time, showing the glans of the penis was shameful).
Of course, some did not go along with them, which is what the Maccabees books are about.
So what about Jesus, I take your point, its a stretch because we do not know where Jesus stood on these matters.
All our knowledge of Jesus is second hand. Written years later, maybe 20 years in the case of Matthew, Mark and Luke and maybe 70 years later in the case of John.
Even if the gospel writers were acting as editors, they had control over what they included or excluded,
So its difficult to have clarity, isnt it?