@TD:
You know Mensa? Morons compared to the Kerfuffles.
did anybody see august 2018 broadcasting yet?
masionic rings always worn on the right hand little finger, these are gatekeep rings.. brother let shows his in a big way, and then the other old brother who was in prison in spain, when he tells his story they realy make a big deal on his gatekeeper masionic ring on his little finger of his right hand..
@TD:
You know Mensa? Morons compared to the Kerfuffles.
did anybody see august 2018 broadcasting yet?
masionic rings always worn on the right hand little finger, these are gatekeep rings.. brother let shows his in a big way, and then the other old brother who was in prison in spain, when he tells his story they realy make a big deal on his gatekeeper masionic ring on his little finger of his right hand..
The “Kerfuffles” are real. And you are correct, it’s not just GB in the Kerfuffles. But they do run things. We all know the GB is just a front. The real power belongs to the Kerfuffles.
A lot of people get consfused between Freemason and Kerfuffle symbology. Here is a standard Freemason symbol:
The Kerfuffle symbol looks similar, but COMPLETELY different:
Two colliding “K”s, with the symbol of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Bad in the middle. It carries the triple meaning of full control, life, and of course death - which they control in many cases.
did anybody see august 2018 broadcasting yet?
masionic rings always worn on the right hand little finger, these are gatekeep rings.. brother let shows his in a big way, and then the other old brother who was in prison in spain, when he tells his story they realy make a big deal on his gatekeeper masionic ring on his little finger of his right hand..
I have said time and time again, these are NOT Freemason rings... they are far more sinister.
These rings signify membership in the “Kerfuffles” - an elite group of JWs only. They wear it on the pinky finger as a symbol, a symbol that they can kill with only their pinky.
It is possible the Kerfuffles are monitoring this thread right now. Quickly, if you know what’s good for you, shut down you computer now, take it outside and burn it.
what are you thoughts on this?.
i find this alarming because jones was very outspoken and had great guests on discussing topics most other media outlets wouldn't go near.. the fact that many have restricted him access to their medium what does this say on our freedoms of speech?.
By them carrying such hate speech...
Quick note: There is no such thing as hate speech.
what are you thoughts on this?.
i find this alarming because jones was very outspoken and had great guests on discussing topics most other media outlets wouldn't go near.. the fact that many have restricted him access to their medium what does this say on our freedoms of speech?.
@Brokeback:
I don’t think he’s gone. For some reason the left thinks he was instrumental in getting Trump elected. But I don’t think any privately owned platform should be forced to host content they don’t want to host. This seems like another example of leftists hounding advertisers... I mean Alex Jones has been saying this stuff for years. Why now? My guess is that these platforms think he’s a liability because some small leftist group got traction with advertisers. If it was anything more than that, it means Jones was right.
I bet his site is getting crap loads of traffic right now.
what the heck.. i couldn't believe it, norm brekkie and tom combs are still alive.. norm is so out of it he couldn't tell you what day of the week it was.. i talked to larry fisher he is gone mentally also.
he couldn't even remember when he went to bethel.. then i called up daryl christenson.
he wasn't so friendly.
He told me, I needed to go to the local elders.... He said he read my book cover to cover.
*sound of phone ringing*
“Hello.”
“Hi, local elder X? This is new boy. I am just calling because I had a discussion with Bethel. I called them and gave them a copy of my book. It was read cover to cover, and they said I should call you guys. I talked directly to Daryl Christenson. He’ll vouch for me.
I am just following up on that. I’ll zip on in this Sunday with some copies. I mean, it was read cover .... to .... cover.”
“Uhhhhhhh...”
what are you thoughts on this?.
i find this alarming because jones was very outspoken and had great guests on discussing topics most other media outlets wouldn't go near.. the fact that many have restricted him access to their medium what does this say on our freedoms of speech?.
...many credit with getting trump elected (not accurate, in my view).
I thought it was the Russians.
what are you thoughts on this?.
i find this alarming because jones was very outspoken and had great guests on discussing topics most other media outlets wouldn't go near.. the fact that many have restricted him access to their medium what does this say on our freedoms of speech?.
@_Morpheus:
It is getting stranger. It seems InfoWars has been banned from LinkedIn too. Not his personal profile, but the company page. Confirmed by LinkedIn:
https://www.cnet.com/news/alex-jones-infowars-removed-linkedin-pinterest-still-up-on-instagram-twitter/
Wtf?! It’s LinkedIn, he didn’t post any content there. This doesn’t seem to be about “hate speech.” How did he violate their TOU?
what are you thoughts on this?.
i find this alarming because jones was very outspoken and had great guests on discussing topics most other media outlets wouldn't go near.. the fact that many have restricted him access to their medium what does this say on our freedoms of speech?.
Hmmm, I am getting into this more (been away from the news for a few days). They are not naming specific instances or exames of violations, so it leads one to believe if they did name specific instances, it would probably necessitate the banning of many other sites.
And if they list “conspiracy theories,” that would take down hundreds of channels.
And if they list “fake news,” then that would take down CNN.
what are you thoughts on this?.
i find this alarming because jones was very outspoken and had great guests on discussing topics most other media outlets wouldn't go near.. the fact that many have restricted him access to their medium what does this say on our freedoms of speech?.
What seems odd is that he wasn’t banned for any of the conspiracy theories. It was “hate speech.” And they can’t seem to point to any specific instances as the cause, just a general “we don’t like what you are saying, so you are banned.”
A few thoughts:
1) Even though they are a private company, you didn’t see this type of logic applied by the left regarding cake shops refusing to bake cakes for gays.
2) YouTube and Facebook funnel billions of dollars of revenue through these sites, and people spend lots of time and money advertising and building an audience on these sites. They do this (spend the money and time) with specific terms of use in mind. This may end up being a significant civil lawsuit against these companies, especially for some nebulous “hate speech” subjective reason.
3) I am aware that no law has been passed, but I am very uneasy about congress members lobbying for more bans (for their political opponents, of course).