yeah i saw ep 8 tlj yesterday.. first off, the special effects - a combination of cgi and practical - are fantastic, although with a budget of $200 million i expect them to be.. there are many issues i have with this movie and here's one: leia flying through space, i mean, wtf?!.
yes, we know leia is luke's brother and so has some force-sensitivity - she talked telepathically to luke in the empire strikes back.. apart from that, she's never really used any abilities she may have or been taught the ways of the force ... and now she's flying through space!
xd.
...had more meat on it's bones and original twists...
Does Luke drinking milk from the ball sack tits of some alien sea cow add to the “meat” of the movie?
Don’t confuse a “plot hole” with a “twist”.
Don’t get me wrong, neat blue dog. If you liked it, I’m glad for you. At least Han shot first in the new Solo movie.
yeah i saw ep 8 tlj yesterday.. first off, the special effects - a combination of cgi and practical - are fantastic, although with a budget of $200 million i expect them to be.. there are many issues i have with this movie and here's one: leia flying through space, i mean, wtf?!.
yes, we know leia is luke's brother and so has some force-sensitivity - she talked telepathically to luke in the empire strikes back.. apart from that, she's never really used any abilities she may have or been taught the ways of the force ... and now she's flying through space!
xd.
@_Morpheus: TLJ was the root cause of Soylo’s poor performance. After TLJ, everyone had enough. Then as Soylo release approached, you get these news articles saying that Lando is a pansexual.
The moral of the story: SJWs RUIN EVERYTHING.
immigration: the truth about the lie: crimecrime: do immigrants increase rates of violence?
there has been a lot of talk about how immigrants pose a threat to the safety of this country by increasing crime rates.
is there any truth to this, or is it "fake news.
@Sugar Shane: I’ll watch the Joe Rogan interview with Anna, as well as JRE 680, Hassan’s episode. The last interview he had with Moloneux was episode 538 when he answered these questions directly, but I’m interested in the actual reasons why Hassan would call him a cult leader. To me it seems absurd. He’s always said that you should deal with abusive family members while going to a competent therapist, and to make your own choices about it in the end.
A lot of the value in his “Truth of” videos comes from the relentless backing of just about everything with sources that I can look up and verify - as it was with the video above.
It just doesn’t hold any weight... the term is overused and brandished to as another common insult throw out like “nazi” or “bigot”. I’ll let you know what I think of the videos.
immigration: the truth about the lie: crimecrime: do immigrants increase rates of violence?
there has been a lot of talk about how immigrants pose a threat to the safety of this country by increasing crime rates.
is there any truth to this, or is it "fake news.
@Sugar Shane:
Notice the article doesn’t give any reasons. Just a blanket labeling. He was on Joe Rogan and the Rubin Report and answered all of these allegations. They are baseless.
Did you watch the video? Did you notice that it was backed up with facts and statistics?
immigration: the truth about the lie: crimecrime: do immigrants increase rates of violence?
there has been a lot of talk about how immigrants pose a threat to the safety of this country by increasing crime rates.
is there any truth to this, or is it "fake news.
this is related to a comment i made in a previous thread.
cults exist in many diverse parts of society.
this includes politics.
#1 - How are you applying this to Trump supporters? What is meant by “all-encompassing”? See #3.They 1) espouse an all-encompassing belief system; 2) exhibit excessive devotion to the leader; 3) avoid criticism of the group and its leader; and 4) feel disdain for non-members.
#2 - The devotion (actually a bad word for it. “Loyalty” is more accurate) comes from the fact that he moving in the right direction. It’s about the actions, not him. It’s the policies, not him.
#3 - This definitely doesn’t apply. Take a listen to Moleneux when he bombed Syria. Take a listen to Levin (or just about every other right leaning YouTube channel or radio show) when he signed the last spending bill. If you think there is blind devotion, you are living under a rock. But that is the difference these days between the left and right: the right is willing to be critical when it compromises princliples, the left will do whatever it need to do to advance its ends, even twist itself into philosophical knots.... or call people cultists or useful idiots for Russia.
#4 - Nope. I have a lot of family and friends and workmates that do not agree. But if they put on a pussy hat, yeah, they deserve the ridicule.
this is related to a comment i made in a previous thread.
cults exist in many diverse parts of society.
this includes politics.
@Lee Elder:
Yet another person claiming that the Republican Party is a cult and is degrading into a deplorable state. No real reasons, just something about Trump, and families of immigrants, and you know, other reasons. But hey, I was willing to entertain the idea that there might be a point in there somewhere. So I clicked on the article by the former Republican strategist, conscious stricken by the state of his party... and this is the first paragraph:
For months, Steve Schmidt, a longtime Republican strategist, has warned about the degradation of his party, saying the Trump administration is responsible for a “coarsening of this country” and calling the president a “useful idiot” for Russia.
Did you catch that last part? He is a useful idiot for Russia? Do you understand how that completely and utterly undermines his (the author, not Trump) credibility? You have any clue what that one statement means?
Is this a Republican moderate? Lee Elder, do you think Putin is pulling the strings of this President?
if everything is supposed to be about the lives of children, how can they hypocritically fight to take babies and kill them?
what about the children and their quality of life?.
I don't think women should have abortions. Not even in cases of rape or incest.
I also don't think the state should be dictating what women can and can't do with there bodies.
I believe that a fetus should be granted basic human rights. But I also think the rights of the fetus DON'T supersede the rights of the mother.
So am I Pro-life? Or am I pro-choice?
I feel like I see both sides of the argument. But there's a profound difference between how I think other people oughtto behave vs. what sort of behavior I think the State should mandate.
Now this post, I completely agree with. Even in Libratarian camps, the line between the rights of the mother and the rights of the fetus is highly debated. One thing that I noticed, however, is that most people do believe there is a line. How thick is the line? That is very hard to agree upon. But there is a line that once crossed implies the baby is murdered if aborted.
I agree. State should stay out of it. Those on the right should not use the power of government to legislate their morality. Neither should the left.
if everything is supposed to be about the lives of children, how can they hypocritically fight to take babies and kill them?
what about the children and their quality of life?.
@Lee Elder: if what you say is true, then this entire section of the site should be deleted.
if everything is supposed to be about the lives of children, how can they hypocritically fight to take babies and kill them?
what about the children and their quality of life?.
Starting to think you are a troll.
Who?
