Thanks talesin, it was a lot of fun. As far as I know, my wife doesn't know that I was Santa, but she wasn't pleased that I took the little one to see him.
wannabefree
JoinedPosts by wannabefree
-
10
Some people called me Santa this weekend ... my wife calls me Satan
by wannabefree inmy mother's church was having a christmas breakfast this past weekend and needed a santa ... i volunteered.. these little ones thought i was the real deal and one is my child.
.
when we returned home she went right up to my wife and said ... "mom, santa is real!".
-
-
10
Some people called me Santa this weekend ... my wife calls me Satan
by wannabefree inmy mother's church was having a christmas breakfast this past weekend and needed a santa ... i volunteered.. these little ones thought i was the real deal and one is my child.
.
when we returned home she went right up to my wife and said ... "mom, santa is real!".
-
wannabefree
My mother's church was having a Christmas breakfast this past weekend and needed a Santa ... I volunteered.
These little ones thought I was the real deal and one is my child.
When we returned home she went right up to my wife and said ... "Mom, Santa is real!"
-
18
Could a JW be DF for celebrating Festivus?
by Stealth inafter all, it's a secular holiday not a religious holiday.. if i was still an active member, i think i would start a new tradition of celebrating festivus.
most likely no jws would come, but that's okay, it's a famiily holiday anyway.. what grounds would the elders have to disfellowship you?.
.
-
wannabefree
A former close JW friend of mine celebrated "Family Day" every year on December 26th with his immediate JW family, decorations, wrapped presents (no festivus pole or christmas tree) ... his father who observed this family tradition with him was the P.O.
-
5
High court ruling in favor of JW children
by karter innew zealand hearld this morning.. a judge has stopped the children of a jw from going to church and attending witness meetings and allowed them to attend birthday parties and christams celebrations.. the high court ruling comes after the childrens seperated parents appealed against the family court orders regarding custody details.. i think the wts will push this to the supreme court.. .
karter.. .
-
-
18
Using New JW.ORG Merchandise to Share the Good News, t-shirts and painted JW.org toe nails!
by SanLuisObispoTruthSeeker inthere are approved methods of preaching the good news about jw.org in style!.
caleb and his single mammy, tired of your child losing notes to his teacher, pin that note with a friendly, lively jw.org caleb and mommy button for a small fee!
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/356206651751072594/ with our rich hertigage of mixing organization with the skills of a saleman you knew this was bound to happen.. .
-
-
21
Court Bars Kids From Jehovah's Witness Activities
by Bangalore incourt bars kids from jehovah's witness activities.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/64209712/court-bars-kids-from-jehovahs-witness-activitieshttp://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11375208bangalore.
-
wannabefree
Clearly the kids have been heavily influenced by Watchtower propoganda, hopefully dad can find a balanced way to "deprogram" them and help them out and enjoy their youth. No doubt Caleb and Sophia have had a part in it.
I wonder if the mother was brought up a JW and returned to her faith.
-
37
If you don't have an "electronic device" you aren't ready for service!
by LostGeneration infrom the feb 2015 km, page 2:.
have a publisher demonstrate how he.
prepares for the ministry by reviewing the tracts,.
-
wannabefree
I gave my fully indoctrinated JW daughter a new Dell Venue tablet a few months ago ... everybody else in the family has a tablet, most of us not meeting attenders ... she sent me a text the other day that it had fallen and the screen cracked. I don't know the circumstances of the fall, but I have dropped mine a few times without any breakage
This is going to be a burden on these sisters. This can get quite expensive for them.
-
40
8 Year Old Getting Baptized!
by Atlantis ineight year old getting baptized!
(from a jw site.
this 8 year old sister was the youngest of the 31 who were baptized at a regional convention in bogo city, cebu, philippines on the weekend.
-
-
24
I just had fun giving a talk!
by OneEyedJoe inso, unfortunately, i'm still on the tms and had a talk tonight (in front of a co, no less) and the talk was on the subject of adultery.
in the source material there's reference to "spiritual adultery" i.e.
idolotry or when israel had alliances with pagan nations.
-
wannabefree
assigned a talk durning the visit of the C.O. ...... is there an appointment for OneEyedJoe in the near future?
-
70
DINOSAURS - What do Jehovah's Witnesses Believe?
by Bloody Hotdogs! inas part of my deconversion catharsis, i have been building a(nother) website to highlight some of the more ridiculous jw beliefs.
im a looong way from done, but i wanted some early feedback on one article: dinosaurs.
http://www.jwbeliefs.com/dinosaurs/.
-
wannabefree
Concerning the dating of fossils from the same Awake!
I never thought them to be dogmatic on this issue, especially after this 1990 article. As far as religion goes, to me it seemed to be a fairly reasonable way to view the dinosaur issue (at the time and if you were to reconcile dinosaurs with the creation narrative). I think the 1990 Awake! was a different approach to the subject than the Watch Tower's past explanation. They seemed to allow the possibility that humans and dinosaurs didn't walk the earth together, but questioned the millions of years explanation of science.
*** g90 2/8 pp. 10-11 What Happened to the Dinosaurs? ***
The Dating of Dinosaurs
Dinosaur bones are regularly found in lower earth layers than are human bones, leading many to conclude that they belong to an earlier time period. Geologists call this time the Mesozoic period and subdivide it into the Cretaceous, Jurassic, and Triassic periods. The time frames used for these periods are on the order of tens of millions of years. But has this been established with any certainty?One method being used to measure the age of fossils is called radiocarbon dating. This dating system measures the rate of decay of radioactive carbon from the point of death of the organism. “Once an organism dies, it no longer absorbs new carbon dioxide from its environment, and the proportion of the isotope falls off over time as it undergoes radioactive decay,” states Science and Technology Illustrated.
However, there are severe problems with the system. First, when the fossil is considered to be about 50,000 years old, its level of radioactivity has fallen so low that it can be detected only with great difficulty. Second, even in more recent specimens, this level has fallen so low that it is still extremely difficult to measure accurately. Third, scientists can measure the present-day rate of radioactive carbon formation but have no way of measuring carbon concentrations in the distant past.
So whether they use the radiocarbon method for dating fossils or other methods, such as employing radioactive potassium, uranium, or thorium, for dating rocks, scientists are unable to establish the original levels of those elements through ages of time. Thus, professor of metallurgy Melvin A. Cook observes: “One may only guess these concentrations [of radioactive materials], and the age results thus obtained can be no better than this guess.” That would especially be so when we consider that the Flood of Noah’s day over 4,300 years ago brought enormous changes in the atmosphere and on earth.
Dartmouth College geologists Charles Officer and Charles Drake further add doubt to the accuracy of radioactive dating. They state: “We conclude that iridium and other associated elements were not deposited instantaneously . . . but rather that there was an intense and variable influx of these constituents during a relatively short geologic time interval on the order of 10,000 to 100,000 years.” They argue that the breakup and movement of the continents disrupted the entire globe, causing volcanic eruptions, blocking sunlight and fouling the atmosphere. Certainly, such disruptive events could change radioactivity levels, thus distorting results from modern-day radioactive clocks.