For Q:
This thread is about false things (some) atheists think theists believe.
God cannot be perfectly just and perfectly merciful.
That is a logical impossibility like a married bachelor.
By man's defintion of justice, perhaps.
Even in the law, the most important matters were always love, mercy, forgivness. "I desire mercy, not sacrifice."
Wow, tec.
You're starting to sound almost Unitarian.
You mean like a Universalist?
I would LOVE to believe that everyone would turn and repent and be saved; or that everyone has love in them as revealed in the things that they say and do. (from what is written in their books at the resurrection) But that is not the case. Some are cast out of the Kingdom (the same ones who are devoured by fire when they ride out to destroy the Kingdom and those in the Kingdom), and anyone whose name is not written in the lamb's book of life, is subject to the lake of fire (the second death)
I'm not saying ALL theists believe that morality is a function of belief -- most probably don't.,... GOPHER
Yes, I am sorry if I was unclear in this. Some DO say that. I don't though, and I don't know many people on this forum (or in real life) who DO think that. In a video that someone shared on another thread, the speaker who has coined the phrase (faith is pretending to know something that you don't know), is fighting to change the meaning of the word because 'believers believe that faith = morality, and that must be changed."
Well, we don't all think that. So you don't need to try to change the meaning of the word, implying something equally false.
As for your point regarding hell, whether hell is literal or not why would God knowingly create people with full foreknowledge they will not believe in him or meet his moral standards and then punish them for this?
Bob, if you re-read my post, you will see that this is not my faith. Or at least I hope you will see that.
how on earth do you have a clue about what atheists think about theists?
Only by what they have said. Such as the speaker I mentioned above (the 'faith is pretending to know things that you don't know' guy) If OTWO is reading, maybe he could repost the video, or I will look for it. But there were many things that he said, that did not apply to my faith (and I suspect not to a lot of people's faith). Though it would apply to some, I am sure.
Have you still not moved on in your understanding that atheism isn't a unified group with some dogma. You'd have more ground for assertions if you chose an actual philosophy ( rationalism? Humanism? Skepticism?) rather than a word describing a state. Really suggests you don't actually read to understand the real positions of those who claim atheism and labour to explain.
I have never thought that atheism is a unified group with some dogma. If you read my OP, you will see that I even qualify atheists with 'some' atheists.
So after all this time, are you still applying things to me that do NOT apply to me OR to my faith?
I do think you have an important voice here but it would be great if you one day thought about how absurd it is for a stonewalling believer ( you for example) to claim greater insights than those who have been on both sides of the fence.We who have been believers understand your worldview, really, we do.
I know that you think you do. But you apparently do not. Hence the point of the thread.
Peace,
tammy