Posts by Fernando

65

I'm afraid I'd be single for life

by ohnightdivine in

this is quite embarrassing for me to share, but as a 30+ year old single female i have lingering doubts as to whether i can still meet a decent man and get married.. you all know how difficult it is for sisters to find an appropriate partner in the congregation.. and now, all the more so that i've learned ttatt.

i still am bound by low self-esteem, and i do have trust issues, especially with men.

i am very lonely and so i just keep myself busy with work to avoid depression (although it is also a great source of stress).. any other single females out there having similar thoughts?.

Fernando

ohnightdivine, what a beautiful and hope filled screen name, which I am sure is the direction you are headed, and is the future which awaits you.

You may have to cut yourself some slack along the way though. It is a marathon, not a sprint. Meaning that it is a process, not an event.

I'm sure many reading your post can relate and are touched and would love to help, support and encourage as best they can.

Waking up to TTATT is a process, with distinct phases.

So what you are going through is "normal" under the circumstances.

Many have been down this road.

It can only get better - as long as you progress through each phase of the process and do not get stuck.

Look for and accept help.

From non-JW family, friends and professionals.

A genuinely good Psychologist can be worth far more than their fee.

It is important that you have a plan to gradually resolve the conflict between your behaviour (membership of a controlling and deceptive cult) and your beliefs. Humans are hardwired in such a way that we become ill and dysfunctional when our behaviour and beliefs are not aligned. Psychologists call this Cognitive Dissonance. And it is very serious.

One imagines if you proactively clarify and consolidate your beliefs, that it will become easier to modify your behaviour. It was the case for our family, who managed to exit intact and on very solid ground mid-2009.

Our family has found a lot of power, peace, freedom and healing through a focussed pursuit of the liberating gospel of grace (whilst rejecting toxic religious legalism and moralism).

If we can support in any way please feel free to send a PM.

Greetings and blessings

Fernando

South East Queensland, Australia

77

How would you define RELIGION, and why?

by Fernando in

"judge" rutherford defined or classified all religion as "a snare and a racket" in his books "religion" and "enemies".. after rutherford's death in 1942, his protege, watchtower vice president, and aclu darling, hayden c. covington, in the early 1950's, for reasons of legal expedience and supremacist aspirations, suddenly converted the watchtower into a religion.. this was done alongside one of the most audacious, spurious and longstanding swindles of the us legal system.

this involved twisting philippians 1:7 and misrepresenting the watchtower's true nature, objectives and activities.. .

this meant that it became necessary for the watchtower to suddenly reclassify and redefine religion (w51 1/15 p. 43 new legal booklet well named; w51 8/15 p. 511 questions from readers; yb75 p. 161 part 2 "for gladys bolton...").. two new watchtower classifications were suddenly created: "true religion" and "false religion".. now "true religion" meant "true beliefs" whilst "belief" in ever changing watchtower doctrine was equated with the one "faith" of scripture.. all this while the watchtower increasingly and maliciously truncated, obfuscated and hid the liberating full "good news" (or unabridged gospel) of scripture, which it lyingly claimed (in court) that it was actually "defending and legally establishing".. how would you have defined religion before learning ttatt?.

Fernando

I really liked your great definition Giordano.

Personally I might add to it as follows:

A religion is simply man's interpretation [and exploitation] of God's [supposed] silence.

Religious men mostly exploit the situation by appointing themselves as God's representatives, presuming to speak for him, gathering followers, and controlling them to suit their myopic, legalistic, moralistic, and powermongering agenda.

In a word: "Pharisaism".

Or simply: "GB" and "elders".

15

Archbishop Didn't Know Sex With Children Was a Crime

by Stealth in

wtf .

the st. louis archbishop embroiled in a sexual abuse scandal testified last month that he didnt know in the 1980s whether it was illegal for priests to have sex with children, according to a court deposition released monday.

archbishop robert carlson, who was chancellor of the archdiocese of minneapolis and st. paul at the time, was deposed as part of a lawsuit against the twin cities archdiocese and the diocese of winona, minnesota.

Fernando

What a lame cop out by your mother, to say the least, blondie.

I'm saddened by just how common sexual abuse seems to be in the Watchtower (then and now).

23

FAITH is another word for OPINION

by Terry in

i strive to understand things by standing in a different spot and looking again.

i like to recontextualize things everybody seems to accept automatically and comfortably.. why?

to be able to see it for the first time, again.. .

Fernando

Religionist steals faith, and then hides its crime by redefining faith as (religious) belief.

21

Wearing a wire

by Hairtrigger in

hye folks-just wanted some info.

is wearing a wire to a jc or any other meeting an easy-to-do thing.

how do you go about trying to find to an agency that hires out equipment?

Fernando

If you choose to attend, you absolutely MUST record.

Both audio and video if you can.

Even if you never intend to use the recording afterward.

You never know.

77

How would you define RELIGION, and why?

by Fernando in

"judge" rutherford defined or classified all religion as "a snare and a racket" in his books "religion" and "enemies".. after rutherford's death in 1942, his protege, watchtower vice president, and aclu darling, hayden c. covington, in the early 1950's, for reasons of legal expedience and supremacist aspirations, suddenly converted the watchtower into a religion.. this was done alongside one of the most audacious, spurious and longstanding swindles of the us legal system.

this involved twisting philippians 1:7 and misrepresenting the watchtower's true nature, objectives and activities.. .

this meant that it became necessary for the watchtower to suddenly reclassify and redefine religion (w51 1/15 p. 43 new legal booklet well named; w51 8/15 p. 511 questions from readers; yb75 p. 161 part 2 "for gladys bolton...").. two new watchtower classifications were suddenly created: "true religion" and "false religion".. now "true religion" meant "true beliefs" whilst "belief" in ever changing watchtower doctrine was equated with the one "faith" of scripture.. all this while the watchtower increasingly and maliciously truncated, obfuscated and hid the liberating full "good news" (or unabridged gospel) of scripture, which it lyingly claimed (in court) that it was actually "defending and legally establishing".. how would you have defined religion before learning ttatt?.

Fernando

"Judge" Rutherford defined or classified ALL religion as "a snare and a racket" in his books "Religion" and "Enemies".

After Rutherford's death in 1942, his protégé, Watchtower Vice President, and ACLU darling, Hayden C. Covington, in the early 1950's, for reasons of legal expedience and supremacist aspirations, suddenly converted the Watchtower into a religion.

This was done alongside one of the most audacious, spurious and longstanding swindles of the US legal system. This involved twisting Philippians 1:7 and misrepresenting the Watchtower's true nature, objectives and activities.

This meant that it became necessary for the Watchtower to suddenly reclassify and redefine religion (w51 1/15 p. 43 New Legal Booklet Well Named; w51 8/15 p. 511 Questions From Readers; yb75 p. 161 Part 2 "For Gladys Bolton...").

Two new Watchtower classifications were suddenly created: "true religion" and "false religion".

Now "true religion" meant "true beliefs" whilst "belief" in ever changing Watchtower doctrine was equated with the one "faith" of scripture.

All this while the Watchtower increasingly and maliciously truncated, obfuscated and hid the liberating full "Good News" (or unabridged gospel) of scripture, which it lyingly claimed (in court) that it was actually "Defending and Legally Establishing".

How would you have defined religion before learning TTATT?

How would you now define religion?

And why?

22

Trolleys everywhere in my neck of the woods

by KateWild in

i went to an appointment today and what do you know a trolley.. i couldn't stop and chat, but i have another appoinment thursday, i will go early and have a chat.

i love this it's great fun chatting to jws whilst being df'd.. any ideas for my presentation?.

do you think i am harming myself?.

Fernando

I'd love to ask them why they call themselves "publishers of the Good News" when the "Good News" according to Paul, Moses, Isaiah and Psalms is not on their lips or in their heart.

Or like a fellow JWNer asked: "Since Jesus is not your mediator, who is?"

34

Where do we go when we die?

by bsand20 in

jw
friends

my best friend of 14 years and maid of honor passed away 2 months ago at age 32 after battling breast cancer for 6 years.

i haven't been the same since for many reasons.. as a jw kid i believed 144,000 chosen went to heaven, the good people would be resurrected including those who didn't have a chance to hear about jehovah, and the rest, which were of other religions and bad people, died and would cease to exist.

again, because i was a kid when i left, i never really understood the jw position on death and why they came to their conclusion.

Fernando

According to scripture, eternal life (in perfect conditions) on earth (the physical realm) and in heaven (the spirit realm) is the "one hope" (Eph 4:4) which is open to any and all who embrace the liberating (30+ ingredient) gospel message instead of religion (human hierarchies, legalism and moralism).

Physicists (like Michio Kaku) and astronomers (like Carl Sagan) have done a lot to demystify higher dimensions.

In fact, according to Michi Kaku, three dimensions are not enough to explain gravity, electromagnetism and nuclear forces - which proves the existence of higher dimensions. It would appear that Physicists have traced a mathematical path from our familiar 3 dimensions right up to 11 dimensions in "hyperspace".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnURElCzGc0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8slSnNAzr4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0N4eLI2CR3A&t=1m34s

24