you all want to judge America through the eye of the MSM and celebrities. This window is extremely elite and not that big and yet they judge and entire nation on sensationalism. Race baiting, virtue flag waving, it's really getting old
*cough*
now that trump is on his way to making america great again, will you consider moving here where you can get the best healthcare and education that anyone with a lot of money can buy, plus the ability to buy all the guns you need to protect yourself?
and it gets better!
if you are caucasian, you need never worry about discrimination.. am anxious to hear your replies.
you all want to judge America through the eye of the MSM and celebrities. This window is extremely elite and not that big and yet they judge and entire nation on sensationalism. Race baiting, virtue flag waving, it's really getting old
*cough*
now that trump is on his way to making america great again, will you consider moving here where you can get the best healthcare and education that anyone with a lot of money can buy, plus the ability to buy all the guns you need to protect yourself?
and it gets better!
if you are caucasian, you need never worry about discrimination.. am anxious to hear your replies.
Freemindfade: I am saying no one here has actually said that's ok. But your proclamation assumes that anyone here approves of that behavior simply because they are critical of the democrats last night.
Can you keep that advice in mind next time the old and tired "the leftist call everyone who disagrees with them racists" cliche is dragged out?
now that trump is on his way to making america great again, will you consider moving here where you can get the best healthcare and education that anyone with a lot of money can buy, plus the ability to buy all the guns you need to protect yourself?
and it gets better!
if you are caucasian, you need never worry about discrimination.. am anxious to hear your replies.
LUHE:
And to those non-US citizens who are more than happy to moan about America: just don't go there. It's simple.
That's interesting advice:
dude.......i'm like zoning on this.
i can't figure it out.
i got 1.79 and .11 and .11 ...but its not working.
The coefficients on wikipedia (sigma, tau, etc. on wikipedia) keeps track of the number of elements. So if you start out with A=1000 of A's in a bottle and they all get made into B's and C's you end up with 1000 of B and 1000 of C. So in general it holds that
A = 1/2 B + 1/2 C
That you divide by volume doesn't change that and so
[A] = 1/2 [B] + 1/2 [C]
dude.......i'm like zoning on this.
i can't figure it out.
i got 1.79 and .11 and .11 ...but its not working.
ah yes that makes sense. So it should probably be:
[A] <-> 1/2 [B] + 1/2 [C]
to keep Kc dimensionless and
Kc = [B]^.5 * [C]^.5 / [A]
and same procedure as above can be applied to solve for [B], [A]. Does that make sense?
dude.......i'm like zoning on this.
i can't figure it out.
i got 1.79 and .11 and .11 ...but its not working.
I know jack shit about chemistry but here goes:
Go to wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equilibrium_constant
Lets write it as A <-> B + C
The initial concentration of A is
[A] = 3.8/2 M/L = z
Then you know that whatever happens
[A] + ([B] + [C])/2 = z and [B] = [C]
so:
[A] + [B] = z
Then looking at wikipedia I guess:
Kc = [B] [C] / [A] = [B]^2 / [A]
Plug in [A] we get
Kc = [B]^2 / [A] = [B]^2 / (z-[B])
If we let x = [B] we get:
Kc = x^2 / (z-x)
This gives you the 2d poly:
x^2 + Kc * x - z Kc = 0
solving for x gives:
x = [B] = 0.1741
and so
[A] = 1.726
Keep in mind this is just something I am jotting down from wikipedia...
this you will never see on the mainstream media.
before you comment watch the whole video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqaigeqxqgi.
SBF: You are speaking an alarming amount of truth!
But I am still not completely sold on something you wrote a few pages back so I will do what any self-respecting leftist apparently always do when he encounters an argument he disagrees with and call you a "nazi" out of the blue. I hope this convinces you! ;-).
Would your Muslim neighbour treasure our freedoms and democracy, or would they secretly yearn for Sharia to rule?
*facepalm*
Let us keep asking this question as often as possible and ignore how uncomfortable it would make us feel if similar speculations were applied to any other minority, for instance, Jews...
this you will never see on the mainstream media.
before you comment watch the whole video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqaigeqxqgi.
Cofty:
Police in Sweden report there are 53 no-go areas in the capital which they consider too dangerous to patrol.
Non-Jews in Malmo are offering to escort their Jewish neighbors in public areas because it has become too dangerous for them to go about their business because of attacks and abuse by muslim immigrants.
do you have a source? According to the swedish police those zones are not no go zones but rather zones of special attention.
http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=2054&artikel=6630452
Sounds like a Pat Condell fact...
to me they have an agenda and they really don't care about professional journalism.
most are untrustworthy and that's a shame.
LUHE: Russias lies in its propaganda is well documented, heck, they lie deliberately and obviously as part of the strategy. I would challenge you to find similar examples in the representation from western sources.
I did not claim that Kurds were the only rebels backed by the west. They were part of the western-oriented and more moderate groups backed by the western alliance. Once more you are simplifying the situation to the Kremlin talking point: Assad or ISIS/Al-Queda.
I can't agree with the whataboutery about cluster munition and Dresden. Please keep it in mind when some brainless SJW drone bring up Dresden to draw a moral equivalence between the warcrimes of ISIS and the west: Either we agree warcrimes are bad on their own or we don't.
to me they have an agenda and they really don't care about professional journalism.
most are untrustworthy and that's a shame.
Simon:
The trouble with Syria is that it's unclear exactly who's side we should be on, who we should be fighting against and why.
Suggestion:
We could also go with the torturers and the warcriminals...